FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W197830320> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W197830320 abstract "Technological innovation in healthcare is growing at a rapid pace. Developments in genetics, stem cell research, bioinformatics, imaging and screening techniques have broadened out the arena of health technology. These developments in sophisticated technology, it is suggested, have the potential to revolutionize the practices of medicine and healthcare by providing more proactive and powerful tools for the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of illness and disease (Liddell et al, 2008; Webster, 2002). In support of such claims, available research findings suggest that the adoption of new innovative health technologies (IHTs) can result in reducing healthcare costs, increasing productivity, healthcare effectiveness, and improving the patient’s experience of care by better management of chronic diseases (Liddell et al, 2008; Healthcare Industries Task Force, 2004).At the same time, new innovative health technologies present many challenges.Evidence indicates that patient safety and proven clinical effectiveness are insufficient to ensure the adoption and implementation of new clinical technologies. The prevailing organizational and policy context is crucially important as this may present barriers which slow or even prevent uptake (Lehoux 2006). In recent years there hasbeen a continuing debate around issues of clinical resistance, organizational/clinical restructuring, procurement and commissioning, public trust, and, more widely, around the ethical and social implications of techno-scientific innovations in medicine and health (Williams and Dickinson, 2008; Webster, 2006; Ferlie et al., 2005). Moreover, cost-effectiveness evidence is now required to inform decisions about the funding and procurement of new healthcare services and technologies (Fitzgerald et al., 2002).Overall, the value of the innovation has to be clearly evident to a number of different stakeholders if technologies are to be embedded into actual work practices. These potential barriers have given rise to questions related to the diffusion and adoption of emerging medical and healthcare innovations.This paper examines the dynamics and complexity of innovation adoption processes in the context of a rapidly changing healthcare policy landscape. Drawing upon theinherently socially negotiated character of meaning, this paper illustrates the ambivalent nature of technological innovation by examining the complex ongoinginterplay of heterogeneous discourses in shaping the adoption of innovative health technologies (Law, 1987, 1994). Drawing upon Rye and Kimberly (2007) adoption ishere understood as a distinct organizational process related to an organization’spotential interest in implementing a technological innovation. In so doing, this paperdraws on the findings of a three year research project which examines the adoption ofinnovative clinical technologies in the UK NHS. In particular, we explore the nature,role and dynamics of heterogeneous discourses (technological, managerial/professional, clinical), in shaping the adoption of a retinal imaging technology in a UK hospital Trust. In this regard, we contribute to the development of alternative ways of describing, analysing, and theorizing the process of technological innovation in healthcare." @default.
• W197830320 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W197830320 creator A5026039555 @default.
• W197830320 creator A5032196567 @default.
• W197830320 creator A5056201855 @default.
• W197830320 creator A5087205481 @default.
• W197830320 date "2011-07-01" @default.
• W197830320 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W197830320 title "Lost in translation? : negotiating technological innovation in healthcare" @default.
• W197830320 cites W2001587669 @default.
• W197830320 cites W2046823563 @default.
• W197830320 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W197830320 type Work @default.
• W197830320 sameAs 197830320 @default.
• W197830320 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W197830320 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W197830320 hasAuthorship W197830320A5026039555 @default.
• W197830320 hasAuthorship W197830320A5032196567 @default.
• W197830320 hasAuthorship W197830320A5056201855 @default.
• W197830320 hasAuthorship W197830320A5087205481 @default.
• W197830320 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W197830320 hasConcept C13280743 @default.
• W197830320 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W197830320 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W197830320 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W197830320 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W197830320 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W197830320 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W197830320 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W197830320 hasConcept C201650216 @default.
• W197830320 hasConcept C204983608 @default.
• W197830320 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W197830320 hasConcept C207267971 @default.
• W197830320 hasConcept C21333345 @default.
• W197830320 hasConcept C2777526511 @default.
• W197830320 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W197830320 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W197830320 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W197830320 hasConcept C45237549 @default.
• W197830320 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W197830320 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W197830320 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W197830320 hasConceptScore W197830320C10138342 @default.
• W197830320 hasConceptScore W197830320C13280743 @default.
• W197830320 hasConceptScore W197830320C144133560 @default.
• W197830320 hasConceptScore W197830320C151730666 @default.
• W197830320 hasConceptScore W197830320C154945302 @default.
• W197830320 hasConceptScore W197830320C160735492 @default.
• W197830320 hasConceptScore W197830320C162324750 @default.
• W197830320 hasConceptScore W197830320C162853370 @default.
• W197830320 hasConceptScore W197830320C17744445 @default.
• W197830320 hasConceptScore W197830320C201650216 @default.
• W197830320 hasConceptScore W197830320C204983608 @default.
• W197830320 hasConceptScore W197830320C205649164 @default.
• W197830320 hasConceptScore W197830320C207267971 @default.
• W197830320 hasConceptScore W197830320C21333345 @default.
• W197830320 hasConceptScore W197830320C2777526511 @default.
• W197830320 hasConceptScore W197830320C2779343474 @default.
• W197830320 hasConceptScore W197830320C39549134 @default.
• W197830320 hasConceptScore W197830320C41008148 @default.
• W197830320 hasConceptScore W197830320C45237549 @default.
• W197830320 hasConceptScore W197830320C50522688 @default.
• W197830320 hasConceptScore W197830320C71924100 @default.
• W197830320 hasConceptScore W197830320C86803240 @default.
• W197830320 hasLocation W1978303201 @default.
• W197830320 hasOpenAccess W197830320 @default.
• W197830320 hasPrimaryLocation W1978303201 @default.
• W197830320 hasRelatedWork W2015285932 @default.
• W197830320 hasRelatedWork W2063253379 @default.
• W197830320 hasRelatedWork W2080886703 @default.
• W197830320 hasRelatedWork W2088754770 @default.
• W197830320 hasRelatedWork W2194493661 @default.
• W197830320 hasRelatedWork W2621225958 @default.
• W197830320 hasRelatedWork W2770403237 @default.
• W197830320 hasRelatedWork W2897698498 @default.
• W197830320 hasRelatedWork W2911524026 @default.
• W197830320 hasRelatedWork W2946079517 @default.
• W197830320 hasRelatedWork W2947725367 @default.
• W197830320 hasRelatedWork W2969158919 @default.
• W197830320 hasRelatedWork W3005051365 @default.
• W197830320 hasRelatedWork W3020875076 @default.
• W197830320 hasRelatedWork W3036170084 @default.
• W197830320 hasRelatedWork W3036663895 @default.
• W197830320 hasRelatedWork W3080901452 @default.
• W197830320 hasRelatedWork W3183834877 @default.
• W197830320 hasRelatedWork W934390427 @default.
• W197830320 hasRelatedWork W2119766738 @default.
• W197830320 isParatext "false" @default.
• W197830320 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W197830320 magId "197830320" @default.
• W197830320 workType "article" @default.