FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1978482302> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1978482302 endingPage "2492" @default.
• W1978482302 startingPage "2490" @default.
• W1978482302 abstract "Colonoscopy is the principle screening tool used for the detection of colorectal cancer and removal of colorectal adenomatous polyps [1, 2]. Recently, a large clinical study showed that colonoscopic removal of adenomatous polyps reduced mortality from colorectal cancer by 53 % [3]. While complete colonic evaluation is essential for screening colonoscopy, the rate of incomplete colonoscopy using a conventional standard colonoscope has been reported to be 5–10 % [4–6]. A study conducted in Ontario found that 43,483 (13.1 %) of 331,608 screening colonoscopies failed to evaluate the entire colon [7]. In this population-based cohort study, the factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy were increased patient age, female sex, a history of prior abdominal or pelvic surgery, and having the procedure done in a private office. Other predictors of incomplete colonoscopy include decreased functional status of the patient [8] and anatomic factors such as colonic elongation, tortuosity, and severe diverticulosis [9]. Malignant and pre-malignant lesions may go undetected in patients that are not completely evaluated by screening colonoscopy. In a population-based cohort study, 4.3 % of advanced colonic neoplasms were missed by incomplete colonoscopy [10]. Since 33–50 % of advanced neoplasms are found only in the proximal colon [11–13], additional efforts should be made to adequately visualize the remaining colon after an incomplete colonoscopy. An alternative diagnostic modality such as computed tomographic colonography has been utilized in these cases, however, its usefulness is limited by low sensitivity for small polyps, radiation exposure, and the inability to perform histologic biopsy and therapeutic procedures including polypectomy [14, 15]. As a result, endoscopic approaches are still favored after incomplete standard colonoscopy. Additional endoscopic techniques using gastroscope, variable stiffness colonoscope, pediatric or cap-pitted colonoscope have been tried, but failed to achieve an adequate cecal intubation rate. More recently, a balloon-assisted technique, which was originally introduced to investigate the small bowel, has been applied in patients with previous failed or incomplete colonoscopy. For a balloon-assisted colonoscopy, two types of balloon enteroscopes are available; the double-balloon enteroscope developed by Yamamoto et al. [16], and the single-balloon enteroscope developed by Tsujikawa et al. [17]. The reported success rates of single(SBC) or doubleballoon-assisted colonoscopy (DBC) in patients with previous incomplete conventional colonoscopy range from 88 to 100 % [18–23]. In the current issue of Digestive Diseases and Sciences, Dzeletovic et al. [24] compared the performance outcomes of SBC and DBC in patients with previous incomplete conventional colonoscopy. In this study, the authors retrospectively reviewed 26 cases of SBC and 27 cases of DBC in patients whom underwent failed conventional colonoscopy. The current study showed that cecal intubation was successful in 96 % of patients using either SBC or DBC (100 % with SBC vs. 93 % with DBC, p = 0.049). The median cecal intubation time and total procedure time using SBC and DBC were 17 min vs. 20 min (p = 0.37) and 43.5 min vs. 46.0 min (p = 0.32), respectively. While SBC required less time than DBC, the difference was not statistically significant. Balloon-assisted colonoscopy revealed additional colonic polyps in 35 % of patients in the SBC group and 30 % of patients in the DBC group. Despite the J. U. Lim J. M. Cha (&) Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, 149 Sangil-dong, Gangdong-gu, Seoul 134-727, Korea e-mail: drcha@khu.ac.kr" @default.
• W1978482302 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1978482302 creator A5081841423 @default.
• W1978482302 creator A5089239581 @default.
• W1978482302 date "2012-07-26" @default.
• W1978482302 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W1978482302 title "Single- Versus Double-Balloon-Assisted Colonoscopy After Previous Incomplete Standard Colonoscopy" @default.
• W1978482302 cites W1972993218 @default.
• W1978482302 cites W1979470160 @default.
• W1978482302 cites W1994293456 @default.
• W1978482302 cites W1997829580 @default.
• W1978482302 cites W2000299460 @default.
• W1978482302 cites W2008781857 @default.
• W1978482302 cites W2017342288 @default.
• W1978482302 cites W2020043157 @default.
• W1978482302 cites W2025979538 @default.
• W1978482302 cites W2028605375 @default.
• W1978482302 cites W2033318340 @default.
• W1978482302 cites W2048593372 @default.
• W1978482302 cites W2078206770 @default.
• W1978482302 cites W2080840019 @default.
• W1978482302 cites W2089126519 @default.
• W1978482302 cites W2101952743 @default.
• W1978482302 cites W2118256990 @default.
• W1978482302 cites W2127013243 @default.
• W1978482302 cites W2130543432 @default.
• W1978482302 cites W2134345750 @default.
• W1978482302 cites W2135333659 @default.
• W1978482302 cites W2140876736 @default.
• W1978482302 cites W2154240563 @default.
• W1978482302 cites W2333024423 @default.
• W1978482302 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-012-2318-x" @default.
• W1978482302 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22833382" @default.
• W1978482302 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W1978482302 type Work @default.
• W1978482302 sameAs 1978482302 @default.
• W1978482302 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W1978482302 countsByYear W19784823022013 @default.
• W1978482302 countsByYear W19784823022014 @default.
• W1978482302 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1978482302 hasAuthorship W1978482302A5081841423 @default.
• W1978482302 hasAuthorship W1978482302A5089239581 @default.
• W1978482302 hasBestOaLocation W19784823021 @default.
• W1978482302 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W1978482302 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1978482302 hasConcept C139059822 @default.
• W1978482302 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1978482302 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
• W1978482302 hasConcept C2909339193 @default.
• W1978482302 hasConcept C41260117 @default.
• W1978482302 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W1978482302 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W1978482302 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1978482302 hasConcept C90924648 @default.
• W1978482302 hasConceptScore W1978482302C121608353 @default.
• W1978482302 hasConceptScore W1978482302C126322002 @default.
• W1978482302 hasConceptScore W1978482302C139059822 @default.
• W1978482302 hasConceptScore W1978482302C141071460 @default.
• W1978482302 hasConceptScore W1978482302C2778435480 @default.
• W1978482302 hasConceptScore W1978482302C2909339193 @default.
• W1978482302 hasConceptScore W1978482302C41260117 @default.
• W1978482302 hasConceptScore W1978482302C526805850 @default.
• W1978482302 hasConceptScore W1978482302C61434518 @default.
• W1978482302 hasConceptScore W1978482302C71924100 @default.
• W1978482302 hasConceptScore W1978482302C90924648 @default.
• W1978482302 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W1978482302 hasLocation W19784823021 @default.
• W1978482302 hasLocation W19784823022 @default.
• W1978482302 hasOpenAccess W1978482302 @default.
• W1978482302 hasPrimaryLocation W19784823021 @default.
• W1978482302 hasRelatedWork W1978482302 @default.
• W1978482302 hasRelatedWork W2007126633 @default.
• W1978482302 hasRelatedWork W2025769858 @default.
• W1978482302 hasRelatedWork W2031349951 @default.
• W1978482302 hasRelatedWork W2070487462 @default.
• W1978482302 hasRelatedWork W2070901988 @default.
• W1978482302 hasRelatedWork W2150501461 @default.
• W1978482302 hasRelatedWork W2547759822 @default.
• W1978482302 hasRelatedWork W343795539 @default.
• W1978482302 hasRelatedWork W1990539888 @default.
• W1978482302 hasVolume "57" @default.
• W1978482302 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1978482302 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1978482302 magId "1978482302" @default.
• W1978482302 workType "article" @default.