FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1978668612> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1978668612 endingPage "A41" @default.
• W1978668612 startingPage "A41.1" @default.
• W1978668612 abstract "<h3>Background</h3> A drug prescription guide was written in order to promote appropriate drug prescription in the elderly and to reduce iatrogenic risk. <h3>Purpose</h3> 2 years after its release, we wanted to assess the use of this guide by prescribers. <h3>Materials and methods</h3> An audit was conducted before the prescription guide was released, then 2 years later. While checking the prescriptions for medicines in patients older than 75 years, we raised the following items: prescription of inappropriate drugs (according to the list of Laroche and al.), redundancies of treatment, inappropriate doses and regular monitoring of renal function or not. In this study we compared the results between the two audits (first audit versus two years later). <h3>Results</h3> 25 prescriptions were analysed before the release of the guide and 30 prescriptions after. During the first audit, inappropriate drugs were identified in 40% of prescriptions (benzodiazepines (BZD), hypnotics and a stimulant laxative) against 43.3% two years later. The same therapeutic classes were involved, with in addition, a cerebral vasodilator, a central antihypertensive and a muscle relaxant in the second audit. None of the patients were taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in either audit. 16% had a cerebral vasodilator versus 6.7% first time. Redundancies of treatment were observed for osmotic laxatives (28% vs. 10%), psychotropic drugs (68% vs. 36.7%) and BZD (4% vs. 16.7%). Unsuitable doses because of the age were found for 28% of patients vs. 10%, but also according to renal function during the second audit (6.7%). Monitoring of renal function was achieved in the previous year before audits in 100% vs. 93.3% of patients now. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Despite the willingness of geriatricians to simplify drug prescriptions, inappropriate treatments have increased as well as BZD redundancies and inappropriate doses related to renal function appearing. These results were made available to geriatricians. The use of pharmaceutical checks on all geriatric prescriptions will assist doctors in this work. A working group of pharmacists/geriatricians has been created in order to supplement this guide with a specific geriatric therapeutic booklet, suggesting possible substitutions for all inappropriate drugs. No conflict of interest." @default.
• W1978668612 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1978668612 creator A5004457135 @default.
• W1978668612 creator A5015177778 @default.
• W1978668612 creator A5028944650 @default.
• W1978668612 creator A5054101981 @default.
• W1978668612 creator A5082149426 @default.
• W1978668612 date "2014-02-24" @default.
• W1978668612 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1978668612 title "CP-101 Relevance of drug prescriptions in the elderly before and after the release of a drug prescription guide" @default.
• W1978668612 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2013-000436.99" @default.
• W1978668612 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W1978668612 type Work @default.
• W1978668612 sameAs 1978668612 @default.
• W1978668612 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1978668612 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1978668612 hasAuthorship W1978668612A5004457135 @default.
• W1978668612 hasAuthorship W1978668612A5015177778 @default.
• W1978668612 hasAuthorship W1978668612A5028944650 @default.
• W1978668612 hasAuthorship W1978668612A5054101981 @default.
• W1978668612 hasAuthorship W1978668612A5082149426 @default.
• W1978668612 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W1978668612 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W1978668612 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W1978668612 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W1978668612 hasConcept C199521495 @default.
• W1978668612 hasConcept C2426938 @default.
• W1978668612 hasConcept C2780035454 @default.
• W1978668612 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1978668612 hasConcept C98274493 @default.
• W1978668612 hasConceptScore W1978668612C162324750 @default.
• W1978668612 hasConceptScore W1978668612C177713679 @default.
• W1978668612 hasConceptScore W1978668612C187736073 @default.
• W1978668612 hasConceptScore W1978668612C194828623 @default.
• W1978668612 hasConceptScore W1978668612C199521495 @default.
• W1978668612 hasConceptScore W1978668612C2426938 @default.
• W1978668612 hasConceptScore W1978668612C2780035454 @default.
• W1978668612 hasConceptScore W1978668612C71924100 @default.
• W1978668612 hasConceptScore W1978668612C98274493 @default.
• W1978668612 hasIssue "Suppl 1" @default.
• W1978668612 hasLocation W19786686121 @default.
• W1978668612 hasOpenAccess W1978668612 @default.
• W1978668612 hasPrimaryLocation W19786686121 @default.
• W1978668612 hasRelatedWork W1506691799 @default.
• W1978668612 hasRelatedWork W2017789405 @default.
• W1978668612 hasRelatedWork W2062268167 @default.
• W1978668612 hasRelatedWork W2169826993 @default.
• W1978668612 hasRelatedWork W2358517006 @default.
• W1978668612 hasRelatedWork W2366710366 @default.
• W1978668612 hasRelatedWork W2371121359 @default.
• W1978668612 hasRelatedWork W2741389566 @default.
• W1978668612 hasRelatedWork W2911654862 @default.
• W1978668612 hasRelatedWork W2149351151 @default.
• W1978668612 hasVolume "21" @default.
• W1978668612 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1978668612 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1978668612 magId "1978668612" @default.
• W1978668612 workType "article" @default.