FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1978746228> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1978746228 endingPage "865" @default.
• W1978746228 startingPage "859" @default.
• W1978746228 abstract "Background: Vascular access stenosis is a frequent problem in hemodialysis patients. There is little published literature comparing the features of stenosis between arteriovenous fistulas and grafts, relative outcomes of elective angioplasty, and clinical factors predictive of access patency after angioplasty. Methods: Prospective data were collected for all patients referred for a fistulogram during a 2-year period because of suspected access stenosis. Angioplasty was performed if there was greater than 50% stenosis. For each procedure, we recorded the number and location of stenotic lesions, degree of stenosis (on a scale of 1 to 4), and ratio of access to systemic systolic pressure. All subsequent access procedures were tracked prospectively to calculate intervention-free access survival. Multivariable analysis was used to evaluate clinical factors affecting access patency after angioplasty. Results: Five hundred forty-three fistulograms were obtained: 358 in grafts and 185 in fistulas. The likelihood of finding a significant stenosis was substantially lower in fistulas than grafts (39.4% versus 68.7%; P < 0.001). Among patients with a significant stenosis, those with fistulas were less likely to have 2 or more stenotic lesions (12.5% versus 33.1%; P < 0.001). After angioplasty, degree of stenosis (1.35 ± 0.70 versus 1.23 ± 0.52) and access to systemic pressure ratio (0.34 ± 0.15 versus 0.32 ± 0.14) were similar between fistulas and grafts. Intervention-free survival was similar for fistulas and grafts (median survival, 7.5 versus 6.2 months; P = 0.36). Using multivariable stepwise proportional hazard regression analysis, only female sex, residual access stenosis, and postangioplasty access pressure ratio greater than 0.4 significantly predicted access survival (P = 0.0006). Conclusion: The positive predictive value of clinical evaluation for access stenosis is substantially lower for fistulas than grafts. The technical success of angioplasty and subsequent primary patency are similar for fistulas and grafts. Finally, female sex, residual stenosis, and high postprocedure access pressure ratio are each predictive of shorter access patency after elective angioplasty. Background: Vascular access stenosis is a frequent problem in hemodialysis patients. There is little published literature comparing the features of stenosis between arteriovenous fistulas and grafts, relative outcomes of elective angioplasty, and clinical factors predictive of access patency after angioplasty. Methods: Prospective data were collected for all patients referred for a fistulogram during a 2-year period because of suspected access stenosis. Angioplasty was performed if there was greater than 50% stenosis. For each procedure, we recorded the number and location of stenotic lesions, degree of stenosis (on a scale of 1 to 4), and ratio of access to systemic systolic pressure. All subsequent access procedures were tracked prospectively to calculate intervention-free access survival. Multivariable analysis was used to evaluate clinical factors affecting access patency after angioplasty. Results: Five hundred forty-three fistulograms were obtained: 358 in grafts and 185 in fistulas. The likelihood of finding a significant stenosis was substantially lower in fistulas than grafts (39.4% versus 68.7%; P < 0.001). Among patients with a significant stenosis, those with fistulas were less likely to have 2 or more stenotic lesions (12.5% versus 33.1%; P < 0.001). After angioplasty, degree of stenosis (1.35 ± 0.70 versus 1.23 ± 0.52) and access to systemic pressure ratio (0.34 ± 0.15 versus 0.32 ± 0.14) were similar between fistulas and grafts. Intervention-free survival was similar for fistulas and grafts (median survival, 7.5 versus 6.2 months; P = 0.36). Using multivariable stepwise proportional hazard regression analysis, only female sex, residual access stenosis, and postangioplasty access pressure ratio greater than 0.4 significantly predicted access survival (P = 0.0006). Conclusion: The positive predictive value of clinical evaluation for access stenosis is substantially lower for fistulas than grafts. The technical success of angioplasty and subsequent primary patency are similar for fistulas and grafts. Finally, female sex, residual stenosis, and high postprocedure access pressure ratio are each predictive of shorter access patency after elective angioplasty." @default.
• W1978746228 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1978746228 creator A5004938383 @default.
• W1978746228 creator A5009707355 @default.
• W1978746228 creator A5015394866 @default.
• W1978746228 creator A5064991953 @default.
• W1978746228 creator A5083849374 @default.
• W1978746228 date "2004-11-01" @default.
• W1978746228 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W1978746228 title "Vascular access stenosis: Comparison of arteriovenous grafts and fistulas" @default.
• W1978746228 cites W1970349542 @default.
• W1978746228 cites W1971131193 @default.
• W1978746228 cites W1980078727 @default.
• W1978746228 cites W1983193952 @default.
• W1978746228 cites W1986862277 @default.
• W1978746228 cites W1993337549 @default.
• W1978746228 cites W2003768630 @default.
• W1978746228 cites W2016274363 @default.
• W1978746228 cites W2019908711 @default.
• W1978746228 cites W2032268558 @default.
• W1978746228 cites W2038494019 @default.
• W1978746228 cites W2042485869 @default.
• W1978746228 cites W2045351365 @default.
• W1978746228 cites W2060626892 @default.
• W1978746228 cites W2071016027 @default.
• W1978746228 cites W2082142553 @default.
• W1978746228 cites W2085939499 @default.
• W1978746228 cites W2108948455 @default.
• W1978746228 cites W2114153597 @default.
• W1978746228 cites W2123803594 @default.
• W1978746228 cites W2141939669 @default.
• W1978746228 cites W2148022884 @default.
• W1978746228 cites W2148844030 @default.
• W1978746228 cites W2152650409 @default.
• W1978746228 doi "https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2004.07.011" @default.
• W1978746228 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15492952" @default.
• W1978746228 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W1978746228 type Work @default.
• W1978746228 sameAs 1978746228 @default.
• W1978746228 citedByCount "53" @default.
• W1978746228 countsByYear W19787462282012 @default.
• W1978746228 countsByYear W19787462282013 @default.
• W1978746228 countsByYear W19787462282014 @default.
• W1978746228 countsByYear W19787462282015 @default.
• W1978746228 countsByYear W19787462282016 @default.
• W1978746228 countsByYear W19787462282018 @default.
• W1978746228 countsByYear W19787462282019 @default.
• W1978746228 countsByYear W19787462282020 @default.
• W1978746228 countsByYear W19787462282022 @default.
• W1978746228 countsByYear W19787462282023 @default.
• W1978746228 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1978746228 hasAuthorship W1978746228A5004938383 @default.
• W1978746228 hasAuthorship W1978746228A5009707355 @default.
• W1978746228 hasAuthorship W1978746228A5015394866 @default.
• W1978746228 hasAuthorship W1978746228A5064991953 @default.
• W1978746228 hasAuthorship W1978746228A5083849374 @default.
• W1978746228 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1978746228 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W1978746228 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1978746228 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W1978746228 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W1978746228 hasConcept C207103383 @default.
• W1978746228 hasConcept C2778063415 @default.
• W1978746228 hasConcept C2779063477 @default.
• W1978746228 hasConcept C2780007028 @default.
• W1978746228 hasConcept C2780326628 @default.
• W1978746228 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W1978746228 hasConcept C50382708 @default.
• W1978746228 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1978746228 hasConceptScore W1978746228C126322002 @default.
• W1978746228 hasConceptScore W1978746228C126838900 @default.
• W1978746228 hasConceptScore W1978746228C141071460 @default.
• W1978746228 hasConceptScore W1978746228C164705383 @default.
• W1978746228 hasConceptScore W1978746228C188816634 @default.
• W1978746228 hasConceptScore W1978746228C207103383 @default.
• W1978746228 hasConceptScore W1978746228C2778063415 @default.
• W1978746228 hasConceptScore W1978746228C2779063477 @default.
• W1978746228 hasConceptScore W1978746228C2780007028 @default.
• W1978746228 hasConceptScore W1978746228C2780326628 @default.
• W1978746228 hasConceptScore W1978746228C44249647 @default.
• W1978746228 hasConceptScore W1978746228C50382708 @default.
• W1978746228 hasConceptScore W1978746228C71924100 @default.
• W1978746228 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W1978746228 hasLocation W19787462281 @default.
• W1978746228 hasLocation W19787462282 @default.
• W1978746228 hasOpenAccess W1978746228 @default.
• W1978746228 hasPrimaryLocation W19787462281 @default.
• W1978746228 hasRelatedWork W113810927 @default.
• W1978746228 hasRelatedWork W2013507026 @default.
• W1978746228 hasRelatedWork W2096161652 @default.
• W1978746228 hasRelatedWork W2355779457 @default.
• W1978746228 hasRelatedWork W2908137966 @default.
• W1978746228 hasRelatedWork W3033349637 @default.
• W1978746228 hasRelatedWork W3033390928 @default.
• W1978746228 hasRelatedWork W3159146421 @default.
• W1978746228 hasRelatedWork W40023729 @default.
• W1978746228 hasRelatedWork W4309024814 @default.
• W1978746228 hasVolume "44" @default.

• next