FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1978783092> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1978783092 endingPage "615" @default.
• W1978783092 startingPage "608" @default.
• W1978783092 abstract "Summary. This paper describesperforation/fracture tests performed perforation/fracture tests performed in large sandstone blocks in a triaxialstress cell to determine perforatinggeometry and perforating-fractureprocedures for optimal fracture procedures for optimal fracture initiation. Four-shot, 1800 phasedperforating guns, steel casing, and perforating guns, steel casing, and oilfield cement were used. In oneseries of experiments, the casing wascemented and cured while undertriaxial stress. Most tests were madewith pore pressure, and vertical andhorizontal wells were simulated. Ingeneral, the tests showed that(1) fractures initiate either at the baseof perforations or at the intersectionof the plane normal to the minimumhorizontal stress that passes throughthe axis of the wellbore and thewellbore surface and (2) fracture initiationdepended on perforation orientationwith respect to the plane normal tothe minimum horizontal stress andthe properties and injection rate ofthe fracture fluid. All fracturesreoriented into the plane normal to theminimum horizontal stress within onewellbore diameter; although multiplefractures were initiated, only primarysingle fractures propagated beyondone wellbore diameter. Introduction Laboratory simulation of fracturing throughcased and perforated wellbores generally hasbeen performed with one or more of thefollowing limiting conditions:scaled tests(rate effects ignored),artificial rock(cement, plaster of Paris, or hydrostone),isolation of the perforations from thewellbore (no pressurization between thescaled casing and the rock),noporoelastic effects (impermeable rock or poroelastic effects (impermeable rock or high-viscosity fracturing fluid),artificially scaled perforations(no perforation damage), andno pore pressure (impermeable ordry rock). Extrapolation of laboratory results todownhole situations must proceed withcaution whenever any of these conditions arepart of the laboratory experiment. For part of the laboratory experiment. For example, Condition 3 is unrealistic downholeand Condition 5 may apply only in specialsituations of high underbalance perforating. Conditions 4 and 6, however, may simulatea well with extensive wellbore andperforation damage. To the best of our knowledge, perforation damage. To the best of our knowledge, Warpinski's mineback experiments, inwhich annulus fractures were observed, were the only experiments conducted in theabsence of these conditions. The experiments discussed in this paperwere planned to evaluate the effect ofperformations on fracture initiation. Because of performations on fracture initiation. Because of the limiting-condition issues discussedabove, fill-scale experiments wereconducted in sandstone rock in a large triaxial stressframe that simulated downhole conditions. Test Fixture The fracture-initiation experiments wereperformed in 27×27×32-in. sandstone performed in 27×27×32-in. sandstone blocks in Terra Tek's 8, psitriaxial stress frame. The circular frame andits top and bottom platens surround the rockand provide reactions for three independentpairs of flat jacks. Flat-jack efficiency was pairs of flat jacks. Flat-jack efficiency was measured at 91 %; all applied stress datause this correction. Access to the centralwellbore is provided through the top loadingplate. Pore pressure was applied by placing plate. Pore pressure was applied by placing the rock in a stainless-steel can with rubberseals on the top and bottom faces. The canallowed the placement of about 0.25 in. ofbauxite beads around the four faces. Theborehole was cored to 4% in., and 3-in. OD × 2 1/2 -in. ID) steel tubing was cementedin place. Through-tubing, 1 11/16-in. orin., 4-shot/ft (SPF), 180 degs phased guns withthree or four shots were used. Table 1 givesthe rock properties. Experimental Procedure Three sets of tests were conducted (Table2). Experimental techniques were enhancedwith each additional set. Rock saturation andpore pressure were added to Set 2. An in-situ pore pressure were added to Set 2. An in-situ pore pressure gauge, a large 2.38-gal pore pressure gauge, a large 2.38-gal intensifier, and casing cemented and cured understress were added to Set 3. The general test procedure was as follows.1. Vacuum saturate the rocks with 3%brine, flowing brine from the uncasedwellbore to the rock sides (Sets 2 and 3 only).2. Cement casing into rock and allow tocure (Sets 1 and 2 only).3. Place rock into test frame. For Set 3, casing was cemented in place before theframe was closed and cured while understress.4. Place perforating gun in wellbore.5. Close frame, apply desired flat-jackand pore pressures; the wellbore is ventedto atmosphere.6. Fire gun. For Set 3, the casing cementcured for a minimum of 24 hours before thegun was fired.7. Flow brine at 2,000 psi from the beadpack through perforations; measure flow pack through perforations; measure flow rate8. Perform various prefractureprocedures depending on test set. procedures depending on test set. 9. Fracture rock with red dye used infracture fluids.10. Remove, cut open, and examine rock. Experimental Results Set 1, Torrey Buff Sandstone. Equipmentfailure prevented on of the specimensin this set. After perforation, the wellborewas flushed with brine, and on Tests 2 and4, brine was injected at low pressure throughthe perforations to saturate the rock locallynear the wellbore. JPT P. 608" @default.
• W1978783092 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1978783092 creator A5009045717 @default.
• W1978783092 creator A5074694567 @default.
• W1978783092 date "1991-05-01" @default.
• W1978783092 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W1978783092 title "Effect of Perforations on Fracture Initiation" @default.
• W1978783092 doi "https://doi.org/10.2118/20661-pa" @default.
• W1978783092 hasPublicationYear "1991" @default.
• W1978783092 type Work @default.
• W1978783092 sameAs 1978783092 @default.
• W1978783092 citedByCount "124" @default.
• W1978783092 countsByYear W19787830922012 @default.
• W1978783092 countsByYear W19787830922013 @default.
• W1978783092 countsByYear W19787830922014 @default.
• W1978783092 countsByYear W19787830922015 @default.
• W1978783092 countsByYear W19787830922016 @default.
• W1978783092 countsByYear W19787830922017 @default.
• W1978783092 countsByYear W19787830922018 @default.
• W1978783092 countsByYear W19787830922019 @default.
• W1978783092 countsByYear W19787830922020 @default.
• W1978783092 countsByYear W19787830922021 @default.
• W1978783092 countsByYear W19787830922022 @default.
• W1978783092 countsByYear W19787830922023 @default.
• W1978783092 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1978783092 hasAuthorship W1978783092A5009045717 @default.
• W1978783092 hasAuthorship W1978783092A5074694567 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConcept C105569014 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConcept C181965411 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConcept C183250156 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConcept C187320778 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConcept C21036866 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConcept C2778456384 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConcept C2778527123 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConcept C2779096232 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConcept C30399818 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConcept C43369102 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConcept C548895740 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConcept C6648577 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConcept C78762247 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConcept C81803558 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConcept C9677107 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConceptScore W1978783092C105569014 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConceptScore W1978783092C127313418 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConceptScore W1978783092C138885662 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConceptScore W1978783092C151730666 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConceptScore W1978783092C159985019 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConceptScore W1978783092C181965411 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConceptScore W1978783092C183250156 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConceptScore W1978783092C187320778 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConceptScore W1978783092C192562407 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConceptScore W1978783092C21036866 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConceptScore W1978783092C2778456384 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConceptScore W1978783092C2778527123 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConceptScore W1978783092C2779096232 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConceptScore W1978783092C30399818 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConceptScore W1978783092C41895202 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConceptScore W1978783092C43369102 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConceptScore W1978783092C548895740 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConceptScore W1978783092C6648577 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConceptScore W1978783092C78762247 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConceptScore W1978783092C81803558 @default.
• W1978783092 hasConceptScore W1978783092C9677107 @default.
• W1978783092 hasIssue "05" @default.
• W1978783092 hasLocation W19787830921 @default.
• W1978783092 hasOpenAccess W1978783092 @default.
• W1978783092 hasPrimaryLocation W19787830921 @default.
• W1978783092 hasRelatedWork W1963700249 @default.
• W1978783092 hasRelatedWork W1980036236 @default.
• W1978783092 hasRelatedWork W2015535880 @default.
• W1978783092 hasRelatedWork W2044453341 @default.
• W1978783092 hasRelatedWork W2083802208 @default.
• W1978783092 hasRelatedWork W2091880458 @default.
• W1978783092 hasRelatedWork W2357814361 @default.
• W1978783092 hasRelatedWork W32731305 @default.
• W1978783092 hasRelatedWork W4254646943 @default.
• W1978783092 hasRelatedWork W4289346331 @default.
• W1978783092 hasVolume "43" @default.
• W1978783092 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1978783092 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1978783092 magId "1978783092" @default.
• W1978783092 workType "article" @default.