FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1978837112> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1978837112 endingPage "104" @default.
• W1978837112 startingPage "87" @default.
• W1978837112 abstract "Microfiction: What Makes a Very Short Story Very Short? William Nelles (bio) Impressed by Woodrow Wilson’s speeches, a member of his cabinet asked him how long it took to prepare them. “It depends,” Wilson told him. “If I am to speak ten minutes, I need a week for preparation; if fifteen minutes, three days; if half an hour, two days; if an hour, I am ready now” (Boller 226; as the anecdote reminds us, Wilson was a college professor before getting into administration).1 In speeches and letters, as in journal articles, brevity is readily appreciated; in fiction, it hasn’t been so easy to defend. The stigmatization of the very short work begins at least as early as Aristotle’s stipulation that size does matter: “Beauty is a matter of size and order, and therefore impossible … in a very minute creature … the longer the story, consistently with its being comprehensible as a whole, the finer it is by reason of its magnitude” (233). Edgar Allan Poe concurred about the limitations of works that are “too brief ” (May 60): “Without a certain continuity of effort—without a certain duration or repetition of purpose—the soul is never deeply moved” (61); “a certain degree of duration is absolutely requisite for the production of any effect at all” (69). Nevertheless, there have always been artists willing to risk the miniature. Such short verbal forms as the parable, exemplum, fabliau, and fable have been widely and more or less continuously practiced for millennia. Our contemporary society has been especially prolific of miniature art forms, such as post cards, pop songs (and their accompanying videos), television commercials, and bumper stickers. My interest here lies in describing the contemporary miniature narrative genre variously called “microfiction,” “flash fiction,” “sudden fiction,” “minute stories,” “short-shorts,” and so on.2 While such poetic forms as the sonnet, haiku, and epigram have been recognized as prestigious genres, serious criticism of very short prose works has been [End Page 87] slower to develop. Something of an academic canon of miniature stories has begun to coalesce, however, including such familiar anthology pieces as Raymond Carver’s “Popular Mechanics” (434 words, perhaps the quintessential microstory), Julio Cortázar’s “A Continuity of Parks” (639 words), Carolyn Forché’s “The Colonel” (324 words), and Jamaica Kincaid’s “Girl” (660 words). While it is perhaps premature to jump all the way onto the bandwagon with Lauro Zavala, who has declared that “la minificción es la escritura del próximo milenio” (“minifiction is the writing of the next millennium”) and “la clave del futuro de la lectura” (“Seis” 1, 14; “the key to the future of reading”), the popularity of the genre (and the increasing number of college courses devoted to it), combined with the number of distinguished writers who have increasingly come to practice it, justifies further attention. My central claim in this essay will be that most stories shorter than a couple of pages or so (say around 700 words) are not just quantitatively but qualitatively different than most stories above that length. The most systematic analysis of narrative brevity is still Norman Friedman’s classic 1958 essay “What Makes a Short Story Short?,” and I accordingly begin my argument with a review of his important discussion. My conclusions about the formal effects of brevity, however, differ considerably from his. Specifically, I propose that a generic distinction may be drawn between short stories and microstories on the basis of six key narrative elements: action, character, setting, temporality (especially duration and order), intertextuality, and closure. Before laying out my analysis, I should stipulate that my focus on formal elements does not mean that I deny the relevance of other factors. There has been a dramatic spike in the production and consumption of very short stories since the 1980s, which suggests that historical and social contexts, not just formal considerations, have influenced the development of microfiction. At the most general level, Raymond Carver has claimed that the very nature of reality (or of the writer’s perception of it) helps dictate the length of a piece: “To write a novel, it seemed to me, a writer should be living in a world that..." @default.
• W1978837112 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1978837112 creator A5068472348 @default.
• W1978837112 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W1978837112 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W1978837112 title "Microfiction: What Makes a Very Short Story Very Short?" @default.
• W1978837112 cites W130996831 @default.
• W1978837112 cites W1528676872 @default.
• W1978837112 cites W1540080223 @default.
• W1978837112 cites W1585958051 @default.
• W1978837112 cites W1980417610 @default.
• W1978837112 cites W2034854192 @default.
• W1978837112 cites W2054443174 @default.
• W1978837112 cites W2078421672 @default.
• W1978837112 cites W2078503624 @default.
• W1978837112 cites W2164255295 @default.
• W1978837112 cites W2223163689 @default.
• W1978837112 cites W2296907349 @default.
• W1978837112 cites W2314198922 @default.
• W1978837112 cites W2316816330 @default.
• W1978837112 cites W3108656646 @default.
• W1978837112 cites W3118447890 @default.
• W1978837112 cites W568842869 @default.
• W1978837112 cites W579111918 @default.
• W1978837112 cites W593790686 @default.
• W1978837112 cites W596879986 @default.
• W1978837112 cites W601591182 @default.
• W1978837112 cites W616722188 @default.
• W1978837112 cites W617722782 @default.
• W1978837112 cites W621818704 @default.
• W1978837112 cites W636622223 @default.
• W1978837112 cites W650796965 @default.
• W1978837112 cites W651500889 @default.
• W1978837112 cites W655404443 @default.
• W1978837112 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2012.0002" @default.
• W1978837112 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W1978837112 type Work @default.
• W1978837112 sameAs 1978837112 @default.
• W1978837112 citedByCount "17" @default.
• W1978837112 countsByYear W19788371122013 @default.
• W1978837112 countsByYear W19788371122014 @default.
• W1978837112 countsByYear W19788371122015 @default.
• W1978837112 countsByYear W19788371122016 @default.
• W1978837112 countsByYear W19788371122017 @default.
• W1978837112 countsByYear W19788371122018 @default.
• W1978837112 countsByYear W19788371122019 @default.
• W1978837112 countsByYear W19788371122020 @default.
• W1978837112 countsByYear W19788371122021 @default.
• W1978837112 countsByYear W19788371122022 @default.
• W1978837112 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1978837112 hasAuthorship W1978837112A5068472348 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConcept C112758219 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConcept C2776141515 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConcept C2778662471 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConcept C2780620123 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConcept C2780658912 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConcept C2780792186 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConcept C2780822299 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConceptScore W1978837112C107038049 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConceptScore W1978837112C112758219 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConceptScore W1978837112C124952713 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConceptScore W1978837112C138885662 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConceptScore W1978837112C142362112 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConceptScore W1978837112C199360897 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConceptScore W1978837112C27206212 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConceptScore W1978837112C2776141515 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConceptScore W1978837112C2778662471 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConceptScore W1978837112C2780620123 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConceptScore W1978837112C2780658912 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConceptScore W1978837112C2780792186 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConceptScore W1978837112C2780822299 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConceptScore W1978837112C41008148 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConceptScore W1978837112C41895202 @default.
• W1978837112 hasConceptScore W1978837112C95457728 @default.
• W1978837112 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W1978837112 hasLocation W19788371121 @default.
• W1978837112 hasOpenAccess W1978837112 @default.
• W1978837112 hasPrimaryLocation W19788371121 @default.
• W1978837112 hasRelatedWork W1483732727 @default.
• W1978837112 hasRelatedWork W2033249454 @default.
• W1978837112 hasRelatedWork W2166010503 @default.
• W1978837112 hasRelatedWork W2334720037 @default.
• W1978837112 hasRelatedWork W2612043526 @default.
• W1978837112 hasRelatedWork W2884598295 @default.
• W1978837112 hasRelatedWork W3212259716 @default.
• W1978837112 hasRelatedWork W4252428272 @default.
• W1978837112 hasRelatedWork W4385612332 @default.
• W1978837112 hasRelatedWork W2477081420 @default.
• W1978837112 hasVolume "20" @default.

• next