Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1979023819> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W1979023819 endingPage "268" @default.
- W1979023819 startingPage "241" @default.
- W1979023819 abstract "Why Now, Why Then?: Present-Tense Narration in Contemporary British and Commonwealth Novels1 Kazunari Miyahara (bio) Introduction Anne Enright’s The Gathering (2007), DBC Pierre’s Vernon God Little (2003), J. M. Coetzee’s Disgrace (1999), Graham Swift’s Last Orders (1996), Penelope Lively’s Moon Tiger (1987), Keri Hulme’s The Bone People (1984)—what do these books have in common, other than the fact that they are all Booker Prize winners in the last quarter-century? Answer: they are novels narrated basically in the present tense, and examples abound when we expand our scope and search all types of novels published in the same period—with Margaret Atwood’s quasi-autobiographical Cat’s Eye (1988), Michael Cunningham’s temporally multilayered fiction The Hours (1998), Deborah Moggach’s straightforwardly-plotted mystery Tulip Fever (1999), Jacqueline Wilson’s teen book Girls in Love (1997), Jon McGregor’s prose-poem If Nobody Speaks of Remarkable Things (2003), Paul McCartney and Philip Ardagh’s picture book for children High in the Clouds (2005), Paul J. McAuley’s techno-thriller sciencefiction Fairyland (1997), and Sophie Kinsella’s chick-lit The Secret Dreamworld of a Shopaholic (2000). This considerably wide use of the narrative present tense is not a unique phenomenon in these two or three decades. According to Christian Paul Casparis, the extensive use of present-tense narration in the novels in [End Page 241] English saw a “sudden increase [. . .] around the beginning of the ’sixties”, presumably as a result of the delayed influence of the French nouveau roman (Casparis 205). However, as many will agree, present-tense narration has turned out to be a lot more than just a fad import from France. In fact, it seems to have become quite a common, or commonplace, practice. Concurrently, there have been a number of studies carried out to explain the effects and possibilities of present-tense narration. More often than not, those explanations show mutual contradiction. Almost all the scholars of present-tense narration depend more or less upon Otto Jespersen’s “vividness” interpretation as a springboard (see Jespersen 258), and they individually try to clarify what in the present tense enhances the vividness of description. Roughly speaking, there are two schools in the study of present-tense narration. One tries to establish a single, comprehensive principle which covers all the uses found in all types of communication, including uncanonical ones such as simultaneous reporting of a current procedure and so-called historical present. The other maintains that there should be a tense grammar which deals specifically with the genre of storytelling. The scholars belonging to this latter group tend to argue that, in the grammar of narration, tense does not have to express the relationship between speech time and event time, whereas the former group sees the speech-event coincidence as imperative.2 Differences and incongruities can be observed not only between the two groups but within each group as well. Most of those who give absolute priority to temporal coincidence of speech and event rely on a kind of epistemic leap when they deal with the narrative present tense. In order to enable the speaker to exist simultaneously with the past event, they maintain that the speaker’s consciousness temporarily goes back to the point where the event took place. Cognitive grammarian Ronald W. Langacker expresses it as “virtual occurrence [of an event] as part of a non-canonical viewing arrangement,” and says that this “virtual occurrence coincides with the time of speaking,” bringing about “epistemic immediacy” (267, 271n6). Mental-space theorist L. Michelle Cutrer falls in line in principle; she thinks that the readers’ BASE goes through the process of “mental transfer” to the narrator’s V-POINT (418). However, they seem to differ on the issue of how strictly punctual the speech-event coincidence must be. To Langacker, it is of critical importance; so much so that he feels the need to bring in an aspectual concept of imperfectivity to the argument, [End Page 242] contriving a deft metaphor of documents and video tapes that are archived intact in human memory and hence always available for reading or replaying at the speaker’s “now.” The way such documents..." @default.
- W1979023819 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1979023819 creator A5086035902 @default.
- W1979023819 date "2009-01-01" @default.
- W1979023819 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W1979023819 title "Why Now, Why Then?: Present-Tense Narration in Contemporary British and Commonwealth Novels" @default.
- W1979023819 cites W1500952994 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W1507073900 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W1517796583 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W1521676125 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W1531626684 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W1531654621 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W1540858478 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W1568737345 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W1586405747 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W1590156058 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W1621077771 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W1964049414 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W1964728648 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W1987324719 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2008824883 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2009297183 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2010896182 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2012171263 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2016634442 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2021109132 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2022267441 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2031722330 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2033773265 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2035767471 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2037793962 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2041997754 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2043431295 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2044167911 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2058752363 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2062353820 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2079461616 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2084337932 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2101949838 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2152534083 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2152800918 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2162880016 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2322546290 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2322654066 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2325274344 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2325276787 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2332086916 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2463131265 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2550967564 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2587978923 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2738199972 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2796291920 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W2894927295 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W3024807654 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W3035400318 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W3134041658 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W51305014 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W564267753 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W570066540 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W642535350 @default.
- W1979023819 cites W599535977 @default.
- W1979023819 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/jnt.0.0030" @default.
- W1979023819 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
- W1979023819 type Work @default.
- W1979023819 sameAs 1979023819 @default.
- W1979023819 citedByCount "10" @default.
- W1979023819 countsByYear W19790238192012 @default.
- W1979023819 countsByYear W19790238192013 @default.
- W1979023819 countsByYear W19790238192014 @default.
- W1979023819 countsByYear W19790238192017 @default.
- W1979023819 countsByYear W19790238192018 @default.
- W1979023819 countsByYear W19790238192019 @default.
- W1979023819 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1979023819 hasAuthorship W1979023819A5086035902 @default.
- W1979023819 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
- W1979023819 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
- W1979023819 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
- W1979023819 hasConcept C164913051 @default.
- W1979023819 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
- W1979023819 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W1979023819 hasConcept C199033989 @default.
- W1979023819 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W1979023819 hasConcept C2777826127 @default.
- W1979023819 hasConcept C2779387294 @default.
- W1979023819 hasConcept C36914074 @default.
- W1979023819 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W1979023819 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
- W1979023819 hasConcept C85079727 @default.
- W1979023819 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W1979023819 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
- W1979023819 hasConceptScore W1979023819C111919701 @default.
- W1979023819 hasConceptScore W1979023819C124952713 @default.
- W1979023819 hasConceptScore W1979023819C142362112 @default.
- W1979023819 hasConceptScore W1979023819C164913051 @default.
- W1979023819 hasConceptScore W1979023819C166957645 @default.
- W1979023819 hasConceptScore W1979023819C17744445 @default.
- W1979023819 hasConceptScore W1979023819C199033989 @default.
- W1979023819 hasConceptScore W1979023819C199539241 @default.