FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1979561674> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1979561674 endingPage "1492" @default.
• W1979561674 startingPage "1485" @default.
• W1979561674 abstract "Purpose To compare an external sensor-based k-space calibration technique with a routine precalibration method for quantification of method accuracy and reduction of spiral imaging artifacts to obtain improved image quality. Materials and Methods Recently, magnetic field monitoring (MFM) has been introduced as a new calibration technique of gradient field-related imperfections. External sensors are placed near the observed object to measure magnetic field variations during image acquisition. The measured field data are used to determine the actual k-space trajectory and for image reconstruction to reduce artifacts. In the past, precalibration techniques have been proposed where the k-space trajectory is measured by means of special calibration sequences directly in the object of interest. In this study, MFM is introduced as an effective correction technique for spiral imaging. On the basis of a comparison, whether MFM is as viable as the chosen reference method presented by Duyn et al (J Magn Reson [1998] 132:150–153) is analyzed in terms of detecting imperfections of spatial encoding gradients in order to correct for these in image reconstruction. As this technique is used as a reference method, it is given the acronym Duyn calibration technique (DCT). MFM and DCT are compared and timing delays, k-space offsets, eddy current effects, k-trajectory error propagation, image distortions, and signal-to-noise ratio were determined for different spiral sequences in two different phantoms. Results Both techniques effectively detect k-space offsets and k-trajectory error propagation and correct for general error sources like timing delays. In object border areas, artifacts such as deformations and blurring were dramatically reduced. Within all tested categories, MFM performed as well as DCT. In terms of k-trajectory error propagation and image distortion quantification, MFM was more accurate. Conclusion We introduce MFM as an effective and accurate correction technique for spiral imaging, where a comparison of MFM and DCT has shown that both techniques are accurate correction techniques for spiral imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2009;29:1485–1492. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc." @default.
• W1979561674 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1979561674 creator A5010320049 @default.
• W1979561674 creator A5015066030 @default.
• W1979561674 creator A5040747518 @default.
• W1979561674 creator A5041445688 @default.
• W1979561674 creator A5085440402 @default.
• W1979561674 date "2009-06-01" @default.
• W1979561674 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W1979561674 title "Spiral imaging artifact reduction: A comparison of two k-trajectory measurement methods" @default.
• W1979561674 cites W1964294275 @default.
• W1979561674 cites W1964808148 @default.
• W1979561674 cites W1979051347 @default.
• W1979561674 cites W1993852907 @default.
• W1979561674 cites W2002085672 @default.
• W1979561674 cites W2006715640 @default.
• W1979561674 cites W2014153549 @default.
• W1979561674 cites W2017095111 @default.
• W1979561674 cites W2021947696 @default.
• W1979561674 cites W2031356270 @default.
• W1979561674 cites W2031614332 @default.
• W1979561674 cites W2039539956 @default.
• W1979561674 cites W2044823858 @default.
• W1979561674 cites W2048330954 @default.
• W1979561674 cites W2065933404 @default.
• W1979561674 cites W2068713763 @default.
• W1979561674 cites W2078208347 @default.
• W1979561674 cites W2087311267 @default.
• W1979561674 cites W2092643565 @default.
• W1979561674 cites W2099420840 @default.
• W1979561674 cites W2105972569 @default.
• W1979561674 cites W2124783724 @default.
• W1979561674 cites W2127645750 @default.
• W1979561674 cites W2135730039 @default.
• W1979561674 cites W2151354228 @default.
• W1979561674 cites W2156875677 @default.
• W1979561674 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21782" @default.
• W1979561674 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19472426" @default.
• W1979561674 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W1979561674 type Work @default.
• W1979561674 sameAs 1979561674 @default.
• W1979561674 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W1979561674 countsByYear W19795616742013 @default.
• W1979561674 countsByYear W19795616742014 @default.
• W1979561674 countsByYear W19795616742015 @default.
• W1979561674 countsByYear W19795616742019 @default.
• W1979561674 countsByYear W19795616742022 @default.
• W1979561674 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1979561674 hasAuthorship W1979561674A5010320049 @default.
• W1979561674 hasAuthorship W1979561674A5015066030 @default.
• W1979561674 hasAuthorship W1979561674A5040747518 @default.
• W1979561674 hasAuthorship W1979561674A5041445688 @default.
• W1979561674 hasAuthorship W1979561674A5085440402 @default.
• W1979561674 hasBestOaLocation W19795616741 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConcept C102519508 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConcept C111335779 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConcept C115961682 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConcept C1276947 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConcept C134306372 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConcept C13662910 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConcept C165838908 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConcept C174128100 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConcept C197413143 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConcept C2779010991 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConcept C31972630 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConcept C55020928 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConcept C99498987 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConceptScore W1979561674C102519508 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConceptScore W1979561674C111335779 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConceptScore W1979561674C115961682 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConceptScore W1979561674C121332964 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConceptScore W1979561674C1276947 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConceptScore W1979561674C134306372 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConceptScore W1979561674C13662910 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConceptScore W1979561674C154945302 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConceptScore W1979561674C165838908 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConceptScore W1979561674C174128100 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConceptScore W1979561674C197413143 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConceptScore W1979561674C2524010 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConceptScore W1979561674C2779010991 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConceptScore W1979561674C31972630 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConceptScore W1979561674C33923547 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConceptScore W1979561674C41008148 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConceptScore W1979561674C55020928 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConceptScore W1979561674C62520636 @default.
• W1979561674 hasConceptScore W1979561674C99498987 @default.
• W1979561674 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W1979561674 hasLocation W19795616741 @default.
• W1979561674 hasLocation W19795616742 @default.
• W1979561674 hasOpenAccess W1979561674 @default.
• W1979561674 hasPrimaryLocation W19795616741 @default.
• W1979561674 hasRelatedWork W1741504538 @default.

• next