FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1979731567> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1979731567 endingPage "339" @default.
• W1979731567 startingPage "323" @default.
• W1979731567 abstract "The sedimentary budget assessment is an important topic for the scientific and social community, because it is crucial to understand the dynamics of orogenic belts and cope with a number of practical problems, such as soil conservation and sediment accumulation in reservoir. Sediment yield or denudation rate estimates in southern-central Italy are generally obtained either by applying simple empirical relationships based on the statistical regression between the geomorphic parameters of the drainage network and the suspended sediment yield measured at the drainage basins outlets, or by using qualitative–quantitative sediment delivery ratio or erosion models. In this work, we carry out a study of catchment dynamics and a sedimentary yield computation of several mountain catchments of the central-western sector of the Basilicata region (southern Italy), which are located upstream of an artificial reservoir. The sediment yield and erosion rate have been computed through both an indirect assessment of the suspended sediment yield, based on the Tu index (mean annual suspension sediment yield), and the application of the RUSLE and USPED empirical methods. The results obtained have been compared with the historical data of sediment accumulation, measured in the artificial reservoir of the Camastra dam where a detailed evaluation of the volumes of historical (i.e. about 40 years) sediment storage was collected. The collected dataset represents a basic tool both for the investigation of the morpho-dynamics of a typical mountain catchment of the Mediterranean area and the evaluation of sediment budget related to fluvial and hillslope processes. The 38-year-long record of the sediment storage in the Camastra artificial reservoir located at the outlet of the studied mountain catchments permits the validation of empirical relationships based on the geomorphic and climatic parameters of the drainage basin. Among the three different methods of sediment yield evaluation (Tu index, RUSLE and USPED), the Tu index showed the best prediction ability, although USPED erosion model also furnished a good estimation. As also confirmed by other works, the indirect estimation of sediment yield based on Ciccacci's empirical relationships can represent a good proxy of short-term denudation rates in the Mediterranean areas with geological and geomorphological features similar to the study area but the use of empirical models with increasing complexity such as the USPED erosion model can help to explore the spatial distribution of the sediment yield sectors of the drainage basin, the erosion hot-spots, and the role of landslides in sediment mobilization and hillslope-channel connectivity processes." @default.
• W1979731567 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1979731567 creator A5013884111 @default.
• W1979731567 creator A5046225927 @default.
• W1979731567 creator A5061746053 @default.
• W1979731567 creator A5065975688 @default.
• W1979731567 creator A5005888320 @default.
• W1979731567 date "2015-04-01" @default.
• W1979731567 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W1979731567 title "Sediment yield and erosion rate estimation in the mountain catchments of the Camastra artificial reservoir (Southern Italy): A comparison between different empirical methods" @default.
• W1979731567 cites W1530735857 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W1643901912 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W1858612344 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W1964337311 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W1969497589 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W1978110877 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W1980377161 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W1982243143 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W1986736867 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W1987196705 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W1990436032 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W1994985780 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W1995768011 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2001888021 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2004134307 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2005915296 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2006868904 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2007669136 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2014727276 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2018389359 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2021731343 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2026105918 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2026592701 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2029476228 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2039914459 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2048183431 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2049517593 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2055944292 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2060131058 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2060395715 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2061058186 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2061315132 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2061870928 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2075400734 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2086758789 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2089912575 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2118798900 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2123011006 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2136416462 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2137999134 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2153004016 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2163139528 @default.
• W1979731567 cites W2163475804 @default.
• W1979731567 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.11.021" @default.
• W1979731567 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1979731567 type Work @default.
• W1979731567 sameAs 1979731567 @default.
• W1979731567 citedByCount "57" @default.
• W1979731567 countsByYear W19797315672015 @default.
• W1979731567 countsByYear W19797315672016 @default.
• W1979731567 countsByYear W19797315672017 @default.
• W1979731567 countsByYear W19797315672018 @default.
• W1979731567 countsByYear W19797315672019 @default.
• W1979731567 countsByYear W19797315672020 @default.
• W1979731567 countsByYear W19797315672021 @default.
• W1979731567 countsByYear W19797315672022 @default.
• W1979731567 countsByYear W19797315672023 @default.
• W1979731567 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1979731567 hasAuthorship W1979731567A5005888320 @default.
• W1979731567 hasAuthorship W1979731567A5013884111 @default.
• W1979731567 hasAuthorship W1979731567A5046225927 @default.
• W1979731567 hasAuthorship W1979731567A5061746053 @default.
• W1979731567 hasAuthorship W1979731567A5065975688 @default.
• W1979731567 hasConcept C109007969 @default.
• W1979731567 hasConcept C109162521 @default.
• W1979731567 hasConcept C112959462 @default.
• W1979731567 hasConcept C114793014 @default.
• W1979731567 hasConcept C118518473 @default.
• W1979731567 hasConcept C123157820 @default.
• W1979731567 hasConcept C126589126 @default.
• W1979731567 hasConcept C126645576 @default.
• W1979731567 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W1979731567 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W1979731567 hasConcept C166390339 @default.
• W1979731567 hasConcept C17409809 @default.
• W1979731567 hasConcept C187320778 @default.
• W1979731567 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W1979731567 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W1979731567 hasConcept C2816523 @default.
• W1979731567 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W1979731567 hasConcept C4646841 @default.
• W1979731567 hasConcept C58640448 @default.
• W1979731567 hasConcept C6494504 @default.
• W1979731567 hasConcept C65589250 @default.
• W1979731567 hasConcept C76886044 @default.
• W1979731567 hasConcept C77928131 @default.
• W1979731567 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1979731567 hasConcept C87432785 @default.

• next