FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1979770022> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1979770022 endingPage "173" @default.
• W1979770022 startingPage "155" @default.
• W1979770022 abstract "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to study the effectiveness of Project Based Learning (PBL) in comparison to the prevailing English language pedagogy. Design/methodology/approach – The pre-test/post-test experimental design with one control and one treatment group was used to complete the study that was carried out for 12 weeks. In all, 140 female students enrolled in Grade-XI at a public college in Karachi, Pakistan, were randomly divided into the two groups to compare the traditional pedagogy with the proposed PBL method. The participants in the experiment and control groups were taught the same prescribed curriculum using the PBL and traditional pedagogy, respectively. Findings – The study shows PBL to be a better instructional method as compared to the existing traditional pedagogy for teaching compulsory English at public colleges. The participants in the experiment group who were taught through PBL performed better on different curriculum areas as established through the pre- and post-test scores; and they were also found better motivated towards the English course. The data analyses and interpretation suggests that PBL can easily replace the conventional pedagogy and can improve compulsory English teaching – learning practices and outcomes at public colleges in Pakistan. Research limitations/implications – One major limitation was that the PBL methodology was to focus around the curriculum content; and, finally, assess students on the lines as they need preparation for the state-held end of year examinations which serve as the qualification for admission to undergraduate study at universities. The present study was carried out at just one institution comprising female only population; hence the results need validation at other institutions having male or mixed populations. The study cultivated a culture among language teachers for experimenting with different pedagogies, consequently, alongside PBL other language pedagogies may be tried to improve teaching- and learning of compulsory English. The study demonstrated that there is an interest in teachers and learners both for improving current practices and culture. Also, the required resources and that enable this desired change are available within the existing academic set up. Practical implications – This study attempts to solve a serious problem faced by teachers and learners pursuing English course at colleges. It tests out a pedagogy that teachers may adopt within the existing setups. Social implications – The students graduating from tertiary education institutes in Pakistan desperately need good language and communication skills for further education and career. Due to ineffective language teaching, these students are unable to develop the needed language skills, and consequently miss out on different opportunities. Originality/value – This paper is among the foremost experimental study undertaken to reform language teaching at public colleges in Pakistan. It proposes a practical solution to replace the traditional pedagogy and enables teachers and students to engage in teaching learning of English more meaningfully." @default.
• W1979770022 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1979770022 creator A5024355035 @default.
• W1979770022 creator A5084762504 @default.
• W1979770022 date "2015-04-13" @default.
• W1979770022 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1979770022 title "Proposing Project Based Learning as an alternative to traditional ELT pedagogy at public colleges in Pakistan" @default.
• W1979770022 cites W1964466348 @default.
• W1979770022 cites W1968288110 @default.
• W1979770022 cites W1998281197 @default.
• W1979770022 cites W2015599431 @default.
• W1979770022 cites W2018926543 @default.
• W1979770022 cites W2031154473 @default.
• W1979770022 cites W2060180041 @default.
• W1979770022 cites W2082849083 @default.
• W1979770022 cites W2099420507 @default.
• W1979770022 cites W2103024059 @default.
• W1979770022 cites W2117235457 @default.
• W1979770022 cites W2119213959 @default.
• W1979770022 cites W2150871499 @default.
• W1979770022 cites W2920248742 @default.
• W1979770022 cites W40146600 @default.
• W1979770022 cites W4243884945 @default.
• W1979770022 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlls-09-2013-0049" @default.
• W1979770022 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1979770022 type Work @default.
• W1979770022 sameAs 1979770022 @default.
• W1979770022 citedByCount "15" @default.
• W1979770022 countsByYear W19797700222016 @default.
• W1979770022 countsByYear W19797700222019 @default.
• W1979770022 countsByYear W19797700222020 @default.
• W1979770022 countsByYear W19797700222021 @default.
• W1979770022 countsByYear W19797700222022 @default.
• W1979770022 countsByYear W19797700222023 @default.
• W1979770022 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1979770022 hasAuthorship W1979770022A5024355035 @default.
• W1979770022 hasAuthorship W1979770022A5084762504 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConcept C2775924081 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConcept C2776089186 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConcept C2779825147 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConcept C47177190 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConcept C51067260 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConcept C56995899 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConceptScore W1979770022C144024400 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConceptScore W1979770022C145420912 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConceptScore W1979770022C151730666 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConceptScore W1979770022C154945302 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConceptScore W1979770022C15744967 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConceptScore W1979770022C19165224 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConceptScore W1979770022C19417346 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConceptScore W1979770022C2775924081 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConceptScore W1979770022C2776089186 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConceptScore W1979770022C2777267654 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConceptScore W1979770022C2779825147 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConceptScore W1979770022C41008148 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConceptScore W1979770022C47177190 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConceptScore W1979770022C509550671 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConceptScore W1979770022C51067260 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConceptScore W1979770022C56995899 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConceptScore W1979770022C71924100 @default.
• W1979770022 hasConceptScore W1979770022C86803240 @default.
• W1979770022 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W1979770022 hasLocation W19797700221 @default.
• W1979770022 hasOpenAccess W1979770022 @default.
• W1979770022 hasPrimaryLocation W19797700221 @default.
• W1979770022 hasRelatedWork W1460485211 @default.
• W1979770022 hasRelatedWork W2018565197 @default.
• W1979770022 hasRelatedWork W2024165873 @default.
• W1979770022 hasRelatedWork W2058869682 @default.
• W1979770022 hasRelatedWork W2165860906 @default.
• W1979770022 hasRelatedWork W2167308572 @default.
• W1979770022 hasRelatedWork W2185748377 @default.
• W1979770022 hasRelatedWork W2354509678 @default.
• W1979770022 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W1979770022 hasRelatedWork W4210373641 @default.
• W1979770022 hasVolume "4" @default.
• W1979770022 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1979770022 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1979770022 magId "1979770022" @default.
• W1979770022 workType "article" @default.