FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1980073132> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1980073132 endingPage "208" @default.
• W1980073132 startingPage "200" @default.
• W1980073132 abstract "Statement of problem There is little agreement in the dental literature as to how much color difference constitutes an acceptable shade mismatch or how much color difference is considered perceivable to observers. Most studies attempting to determine perceptibility and acceptability of tolerances for shade mismatches have been conducted under in vitro conditions that are not applicable to clinical scenarios. Purpose The goal of this study was to determine valid acceptability and perceptibility tolerances for shade mismatch in an actual clinical scenario using spectroradiometric instrumentation. Material and methods A test denture was fabricated that allowed 10 maxillary left central incisors of varying shade mismatch with the right central incisor to be interchanged within the denture base. A spectroradiometer was used to determine the CIELAB coordinates and color differences (ΔE) between the right central incisor and the interchangeable left central incisor denture teeth. The interchangeable denture teeth ranged uniformly from 1 ΔE unit (visually undetectable) to greater than 10 ΔE units (an obvious shade mismatch). The test denture with each of the interchangeable teeth was modeled by a subject to 28 dentists in a clinical setting. For each of the interchangeable teeth, dentist observers were asked if they could see a difference between the central incisors and, if so, whether the difference was acceptable. A Probit regression analysis was used to predict acceptability and perceptibility tolerances with 95% confidence limits. Results The predicted color difference at which 50% of the dentist observers could perceive a color difference (50/50 perceptibility) was 2.6 ΔE units. The predicted color difference at which 50% of the subjects would remake the restoration due to color mismatch (clinically unacceptable color match) was 5.5 ΔE. Acceptability and perceptibility color tolerances at the 50/50 level were significantly different (P<.05), as their 95% confidence limits did not overlap. Conclusions Tolerances for perceptibility were significantly lower than tolerances for acceptability for shade mismatch between 2 denture teeth. There is little agreement in the dental literature as to how much color difference constitutes an acceptable shade mismatch or how much color difference is considered perceivable to observers. Most studies attempting to determine perceptibility and acceptability of tolerances for shade mismatches have been conducted under in vitro conditions that are not applicable to clinical scenarios. The goal of this study was to determine valid acceptability and perceptibility tolerances for shade mismatch in an actual clinical scenario using spectroradiometric instrumentation. A test denture was fabricated that allowed 10 maxillary left central incisors of varying shade mismatch with the right central incisor to be interchanged within the denture base. A spectroradiometer was used to determine the CIELAB coordinates and color differences (ΔE) between the right central incisor and the interchangeable left central incisor denture teeth. The interchangeable denture teeth ranged uniformly from 1 ΔE unit (visually undetectable) to greater than 10 ΔE units (an obvious shade mismatch). The test denture with each of the interchangeable teeth was modeled by a subject to 28 dentists in a clinical setting. For each of the interchangeable teeth, dentist observers were asked if they could see a difference between the central incisors and, if so, whether the difference was acceptable. A Probit regression analysis was used to predict acceptability and perceptibility tolerances with 95% confidence limits. The predicted color difference at which 50% of the dentist observers could perceive a color difference (50/50 perceptibility) was 2.6 ΔE units. The predicted color difference at which 50% of the subjects would remake the restoration due to color mismatch (clinically unacceptable color match) was 5.5 ΔE. Acceptability and perceptibility color tolerances at the 50/50 level were significantly different (P<.05), as their 95% confidence limits did not overlap. Tolerances for perceptibility were significantly lower than tolerances for acceptability for shade mismatch between 2 denture teeth." @default.
• W1980073132 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1980073132 creator A5002327961 @default.
• W1980073132 creator A5081928001 @default.
• W1980073132 creator A5086255429 @default.
• W1980073132 date "2007-04-01" @default.
• W1980073132 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W1980073132 title "Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch" @default.
• W1980073132 cites W1967260306 @default.
• W1980073132 cites W1975616279 @default.
• W1980073132 cites W1983410014 @default.
• W1980073132 cites W2017356331 @default.
• W1980073132 cites W2019125259 @default.
• W1980073132 cites W2023042186 @default.
• W1980073132 cites W2031769431 @default.
• W1980073132 cites W2035650796 @default.
• W1980073132 cites W2064212720 @default.
• W1980073132 cites W2070801177 @default.
• W1980073132 cites W2077929304 @default.
• W1980073132 cites W2080423299 @default.
• W1980073132 cites W2083012794 @default.
• W1980073132 cites W2094086574 @default.
• W1980073132 cites W2118669526 @default.
• W1980073132 cites W2134319675 @default.
• W1980073132 cites W2145154255 @default.
• W1980073132 cites W2157569732 @default.
• W1980073132 cites W2169181158 @default.
• W1980073132 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012" @default.
• W1980073132 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17499089" @default.
• W1980073132 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W1980073132 type Work @default.
• W1980073132 sameAs 1980073132 @default.
• W1980073132 citedByCount "338" @default.
• W1980073132 countsByYear W19800731322012 @default.
• W1980073132 countsByYear W19800731322013 @default.
• W1980073132 countsByYear W19800731322014 @default.
• W1980073132 countsByYear W19800731322015 @default.
• W1980073132 countsByYear W19800731322016 @default.
• W1980073132 countsByYear W19800731322017 @default.
• W1980073132 countsByYear W19800731322018 @default.
• W1980073132 countsByYear W19800731322019 @default.
• W1980073132 countsByYear W19800731322020 @default.
• W1980073132 countsByYear W19800731322021 @default.
• W1980073132 countsByYear W19800731322022 @default.
• W1980073132 countsByYear W19800731322023 @default.
• W1980073132 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1980073132 hasAuthorship W1980073132A5002327961 @default.
• W1980073132 hasAuthorship W1980073132A5081928001 @default.
• W1980073132 hasAuthorship W1980073132A5086255429 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConcept C108597893 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConcept C130066347 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConcept C159824338 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConcept C162307627 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConcept C186991048 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConcept C2778812414 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConcept C2911043746 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConcept C3018023364 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConcept C61674017 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConceptScore W1980073132C105795698 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConceptScore W1980073132C108597893 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConceptScore W1980073132C120665830 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConceptScore W1980073132C121332964 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConceptScore W1980073132C130066347 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConceptScore W1980073132C154945302 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConceptScore W1980073132C159824338 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConceptScore W1980073132C162307627 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConceptScore W1980073132C186991048 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConceptScore W1980073132C199343813 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConceptScore W1980073132C2778812414 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConceptScore W1980073132C2911043746 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConceptScore W1980073132C29694066 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConceptScore W1980073132C3018023364 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConceptScore W1980073132C33923547 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConceptScore W1980073132C41008148 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConceptScore W1980073132C61674017 @default.
• W1980073132 hasConceptScore W1980073132C71924100 @default.
• W1980073132 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W1980073132 hasLocation W19800731321 @default.
• W1980073132 hasLocation W19800731322 @default.
• W1980073132 hasOpenAccess W1980073132 @default.
• W1980073132 hasPrimaryLocation W19800731321 @default.
• W1980073132 hasRelatedWork W1980073132 @default.
• W1980073132 hasRelatedWork W2017546675 @default.
• W1980073132 hasRelatedWork W2334829523 @default.
• W1980073132 hasRelatedWork W2375910813 @default.
• W1980073132 hasRelatedWork W2529089901 @default.
• W1980073132 hasRelatedWork W3009012314 @default.
• W1980073132 hasRelatedWork W3041881886 @default.
• W1980073132 hasRelatedWork W3046123507 @default.

• next