FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1980150455> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1980150455 endingPage "320" @default.
• W1980150455 startingPage "315" @default.
• W1980150455 abstract "BackgroundIntraoperative graft patency assessment during coronary artery bypass grafting enables detection and immediate correction of graft failure. Currently transit-time flowmetry is used to assess graft patency on the basis of mean graft flow and derived values, such as the pulsatility index. Intraoperative fluorescence imaging, based on the fluorescence of indocyanine green dye, provides direct visual images to confirm graft patency.MethodsWe performed a prospective observational study to assess intraoperative graft patency in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, by using an intraoperative fluorescence imaging system (SPY) and transit-time flowmetry (BF 2004). Poor flow with the intraoperative fluorescence imaging system was defined if there was an absence of fluorescence or if it did not appear within 15 seconds in the graft. A persistent mean graft flow value less than 5 mL/min and a pulsatility index greater than 5 with transit-time flowmetry were considered unacceptable and prompted graft revision.ResultsWe assessed the intraoperative patency of 266 grafts in 100 coronary artery bypass grafting patients. Intraoperative fluorescence imaging and transit-time flowmetry confirmed adequate flow in 241 (91%) grafts in 75 patients (75%). Transient poor flow was detected with both intraoperative fluorescence imaging and transit-time flowmetry in 7 (2.6%) grafts in 7 (7%) patients. This subsequently proved to be adequate on repeat testing and hence did not necessitate graft revision. Both intraoperative fluorescence imaging and transit-time flowmetry confirmed persistent poor flow in 8 (3%) grafts in 8 (8%) patients that necessitated graft revision. However, in a further 10 (3.8%) grafts in 10 (10%) patients, transit-time flowmetry indicated persistently poor flows on the basis of mean graft flow and pulsatility index values, whereas the intraoperative fluorescence imaging system demonstrated satisfactory flow. These grafts were not revised.ConclusionsIn most patients, both intraoperative fluorescence imaging and transit-time flowmetry are useful to confirm intraoperative graft patency. However, in a small proportion of patients (10%), graft patency assessment with transit-time flowmetry alone might prompt unnecessary graft revision. Intraoperative graft patency assessment during coronary artery bypass grafting enables detection and immediate correction of graft failure. Currently transit-time flowmetry is used to assess graft patency on the basis of mean graft flow and derived values, such as the pulsatility index. Intraoperative fluorescence imaging, based on the fluorescence of indocyanine green dye, provides direct visual images to confirm graft patency. We performed a prospective observational study to assess intraoperative graft patency in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, by using an intraoperative fluorescence imaging system (SPY) and transit-time flowmetry (BF 2004). Poor flow with the intraoperative fluorescence imaging system was defined if there was an absence of fluorescence or if it did not appear within 15 seconds in the graft. A persistent mean graft flow value less than 5 mL/min and a pulsatility index greater than 5 with transit-time flowmetry were considered unacceptable and prompted graft revision. We assessed the intraoperative patency of 266 grafts in 100 coronary artery bypass grafting patients. Intraoperative fluorescence imaging and transit-time flowmetry confirmed adequate flow in 241 (91%) grafts in 75 patients (75%). Transient poor flow was detected with both intraoperative fluorescence imaging and transit-time flowmetry in 7 (2.6%) grafts in 7 (7%) patients. This subsequently proved to be adequate on repeat testing and hence did not necessitate graft revision. Both intraoperative fluorescence imaging and transit-time flowmetry confirmed persistent poor flow in 8 (3%) grafts in 8 (8%) patients that necessitated graft revision. However, in a further 10 (3.8%) grafts in 10 (10%) patients, transit-time flowmetry indicated persistently poor flows on the basis of mean graft flow and pulsatility index values, whereas the intraoperative fluorescence imaging system demonstrated satisfactory flow. These grafts were not revised. In most patients, both intraoperative fluorescence imaging and transit-time flowmetry are useful to confirm intraoperative graft patency. However, in a small proportion of patients (10%), graft patency assessment with transit-time flowmetry alone might prompt unnecessary graft revision." @default.
• W1980150455 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1980150455 creator A5018861283 @default.
• W1980150455 creator A5030079078 @default.
• W1980150455 creator A5038869985 @default.
• W1980150455 creator A5053231823 @default.
• W1980150455 creator A5054976259 @default.
• W1980150455 date "2005-08-01" @default.
• W1980150455 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W1980150455 title "A comparison of transit-time flowmetry and intraoperative fluorescence imaging for assessing coronary artery bypass graft patency" @default.
• W1980150455 cites W1970429072 @default.
• W1980150455 cites W1977222829 @default.
• W1980150455 cites W1981956332 @default.
• W1980150455 cites W1989246157 @default.
• W1980150455 cites W1994061205 @default.
• W1980150455 cites W1995987501 @default.
• W1980150455 cites W1996028190 @default.
• W1980150455 cites W2002885878 @default.
• W1980150455 cites W2014859910 @default.
• W1980150455 cites W2033715411 @default.
• W1980150455 cites W2033916349 @default.
• W1980150455 cites W2041288584 @default.
• W1980150455 cites W2045928643 @default.
• W1980150455 cites W2046383076 @default.
• W1980150455 cites W2054908104 @default.
• W1980150455 cites W2080624217 @default.
• W1980150455 cites W2094384706 @default.
• W1980150455 cites W2108265532 @default.
• W1980150455 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.11.033" @default.
• W1980150455 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16077393" @default.
• W1980150455 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W1980150455 type Work @default.
• W1980150455 sameAs 1980150455 @default.
• W1980150455 citedByCount "96" @default.
• W1980150455 countsByYear W19801504552012 @default.
• W1980150455 countsByYear W19801504552013 @default.
• W1980150455 countsByYear W19801504552014 @default.
• W1980150455 countsByYear W19801504552015 @default.
• W1980150455 countsByYear W19801504552016 @default.
• W1980150455 countsByYear W19801504552017 @default.
• W1980150455 countsByYear W19801504552018 @default.
• W1980150455 countsByYear W19801504552019 @default.
• W1980150455 countsByYear W19801504552020 @default.
• W1980150455 countsByYear W19801504552021 @default.
• W1980150455 countsByYear W19801504552022 @default.
• W1980150455 countsByYear W19801504552023 @default.
• W1980150455 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1980150455 hasAuthorship W1980150455A5018861283 @default.
• W1980150455 hasAuthorship W1980150455A5030079078 @default.
• W1980150455 hasAuthorship W1980150455A5038869985 @default.
• W1980150455 hasAuthorship W1980150455A5053231823 @default.
• W1980150455 hasAuthorship W1980150455A5054976259 @default.
• W1980150455 hasBestOaLocation W19801504551 @default.
• W1980150455 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W1980150455 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1980150455 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W1980150455 hasConcept C207386681 @default.
• W1980150455 hasConcept C2776820930 @default.
• W1980150455 hasConcept C2781065829 @default.
• W1980150455 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1980150455 hasConceptScore W1980150455C126838900 @default.
• W1980150455 hasConceptScore W1980150455C141071460 @default.
• W1980150455 hasConceptScore W1980150455C164705383 @default.
• W1980150455 hasConceptScore W1980150455C207386681 @default.
• W1980150455 hasConceptScore W1980150455C2776820930 @default.
• W1980150455 hasConceptScore W1980150455C2781065829 @default.
• W1980150455 hasConceptScore W1980150455C71924100 @default.
• W1980150455 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W1980150455 hasLocation W19801504551 @default.
• W1980150455 hasLocation W19801504552 @default.
• W1980150455 hasOpenAccess W1980150455 @default.
• W1980150455 hasPrimaryLocation W19801504551 @default.
• W1980150455 hasRelatedWork W1586374228 @default.
• W1980150455 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W1980150455 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W1980150455 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W1980150455 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
• W1980150455 hasRelatedWork W2369162477 @default.
• W1980150455 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W1980150455 hasRelatedWork W2803154976 @default.
• W1980150455 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
• W1980150455 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W1980150455 hasVolume "130" @default.
• W1980150455 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1980150455 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1980150455 magId "1980150455" @default.
• W1980150455 workType "article" @default.