FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W198037142> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W198037142 abstract "Courts in America by and large provide their services at nominal cost to users, reflecting the underlying premise that courts are a public service that the public as a whole should fund. This traditional view may merit re-examination at a time when the funds required for court operations are increasing while those available are growing more scarce. This inquiry questions the underlying assumptions of the current system and suggests types of user fees that might be imposed at least on some court users. In many courts throughout the country-trial and appellate-the dock ets are full, the waiting time is extended. Moreover, the public funds spent to keep the courts open and functioning are growing apace with the volume of business (see, e.g., Association of the Bar of the City of New York, 1980). The increase in the costs of maintaining our courts partly reflects our litigious society (Lieberman, 1981). Use of the courts is stimu lated by our belief in fairness and equity and our habit of looking to the courts as a forum for adjudicating a wide range of disputes. The courts themselves have contributed to their workload by expanding their own jurisdiction through recognition of new areas of individual rights and due process. The increased burdens placed upon our court system have created a new challenge. Formerly, the public funds used to maintain the courts were too small to deserve prolonged scrutiny within the overall government budget. Compared with other budget items, the courts' budgets are still small, but they are surely a more prominent item than they once were, all the more so since every object of public spending is subject to challenge in the effort to close the gap between revenues and outlays. These increasing - and increasingly visible - costs have spawned various strategies to reduce or reallocate them. Centers for training judi cial branch personnel have developed and a strong movement toward increased professionalization of judicial administration has occurred. Legislatures have reorganized the courts to provide more centralized management of basic administrative tasks and thus to achieve, among other things, certain economies of scale." @default.
• W198037142 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W198037142 creator A5053637663 @default.
• W198037142 date "2016-01-01" @default.
• W198037142 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W198037142 title "USER FEES FOR THE COURTS: AN OLD APPROACH TO A NEW PROBLEM" @default.
• W198037142 cites W1531225843 @default.
• W198037142 cites W1539732465 @default.
• W198037142 cites W172598033 @default.
• W198037142 cites W2116057227 @default.
• W198037142 cites W2322314200 @default.
• W198037142 cites W240187351 @default.
• W198037142 cites W2736643333 @default.
• W198037142 cites W2764026972 @default.
• W198037142 cites W2795517646 @default.
• W198037142 cites W2907669839 @default.
• W198037142 cites W561253626 @default.
• W198037142 cites W648045929 @default.
• W198037142 cites W159204361 @default.
• W198037142 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W198037142 type Work @default.
• W198037142 sameAs 198037142 @default.
• W198037142 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W198037142 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W198037142 hasAuthorship W198037142A5053637663 @default.
• W198037142 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W198037142 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W198037142 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W198037142 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W198037142 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W198037142 hasConcept C199728807 @default.
• W198037142 hasConcept C2776050585 @default.
• W198037142 hasConcept C2776949292 @default.
• W198037142 hasConcept C2778023277 @default.
• W198037142 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W198037142 hasConceptScore W198037142C138885662 @default.
• W198037142 hasConceptScore W198037142C144133560 @default.
• W198037142 hasConceptScore W198037142C162324750 @default.
• W198037142 hasConceptScore W198037142C17744445 @default.
• W198037142 hasConceptScore W198037142C199539241 @default.
• W198037142 hasConceptScore W198037142C199728807 @default.
• W198037142 hasConceptScore W198037142C2776050585 @default.
• W198037142 hasConceptScore W198037142C2776949292 @default.
• W198037142 hasConceptScore W198037142C2778023277 @default.
• W198037142 hasConceptScore W198037142C41895202 @default.
• W198037142 hasLocation W1980371421 @default.
• W198037142 hasOpenAccess W198037142 @default.
• W198037142 hasPrimaryLocation W1980371421 @default.
• W198037142 hasRelatedWork W1489304659 @default.
• W198037142 hasRelatedWork W1563344842 @default.
• W198037142 hasRelatedWork W1982483166 @default.
• W198037142 hasRelatedWork W2089870984 @default.
• W198037142 hasRelatedWork W2224571916 @default.
• W198037142 hasRelatedWork W2261911556 @default.
• W198037142 hasRelatedWork W2265054233 @default.
• W198037142 hasRelatedWork W2292727892 @default.
• W198037142 hasRelatedWork W2592196819 @default.
• W198037142 hasRelatedWork W279592082 @default.
• W198037142 hasRelatedWork W2888075018 @default.
• W198037142 hasRelatedWork W2908817247 @default.
• W198037142 hasRelatedWork W291418496 @default.
• W198037142 hasRelatedWork W293132696 @default.
• W198037142 hasRelatedWork W3121282823 @default.
• W198037142 hasRelatedWork W3124035422 @default.
• W198037142 hasRelatedWork W3124661818 @default.
• W198037142 hasRelatedWork W3124746604 @default.
• W198037142 hasRelatedWork W3169161556 @default.
• W198037142 hasRelatedWork W3123018050 @default.
• W198037142 isParatext "false" @default.
• W198037142 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W198037142 magId "198037142" @default.
• W198037142 workType "article" @default.