FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1980852356> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1980852356 abstract "Abstract The use of seismic attributes has increased, especially when extracted from interpreted horizons. The various available attributes are not independent from each other but represent, in fact, different ways of presenting and studying fundamental information from seismic data (time, amplitude, frequency and attenuation). However, statistical analysis using attributes must be based on geological knowledge and not only on mathematical correlation. Petrophysical studies and seismic modeling are sources of understanding. Such knowledge is necessary to improve confidence in observed correlations with reservoir parameters and must be part of all attribute analysis. However, the use of seismic attributes leads to several questions, for example, what do they all mean? When to use one or another? How to use them on geologic modeling? How reliable those data are? The answers to these questions are not easy, but considering about petrophysical modeling (Porosity, NTG and permeability) what is the best approach: to consider only well data, that are punctual and need to be interpolated, or try to find correlation with physical measurements (seismic data)? Not to consider seismic attributes makes one feel coming back in time, when this important tool was not available. On a giant oilfield offshore Brazil seismic attributes ('conventional', complex trace, polynomial decomposition, geometric and coherence) have been used to create geological models and to reduce uncertainties. The attribute choice must be performed by the geophysicist and the geologist working together, in order to check geological meaning of attribute maps, possible physical meaning of the attribute, etc. Plots of the highest correlation values should be visually inspected in order to choose the attribute with best correlation to the desired parameters. The results show attributes have been favourable to porosity and NTG prediction, but regular (at maximum) to permeability. For permeability even if the results are not so good, the correlation are improving for the latest models (as long as new wells are used). Polynomial decomposion and complex trace attributes have shown better results. Introduction: seismic attribute definitions and discussions The use of seismic attribute data for prediction of detailed reservoir properties began more than 30 years ago. In fact, a seismic attribute is any property derived from seismic reflection signal. Attributes may be compared to lithology in an attempt to devise a method of property prediction away from well control. The method of prediction can vary from a simple linear correlation to multi-attribute analysis, geostatistical methods, etc. As an evidence of current proliferation the use of attributes, Chen and Sidney (1997) have catalogued more than 60 commom seismic attributes along with a description of their apparent significance and utility. Although there is a rich history of seismic attributes use in reservoir prediction, the practice remains a difficult and uncertain task. The bulk of this uncertainty arises from the nature of the physics connecting a number of attributes to a corresponding reservoir property. Due to the complex and varied physical processes responsible for various attributes the unambiguous use of attributes for direct prediction will probably remain a challenge for the years to come. In addition to the fact above described, there is the possibility of coming across statistical pitfalls while using multiple attributes for empirical reservoir property prediction. In addition, many attributes are derived using similar signal processing methods and can, in some cases, be considered largely redundant with respect to their description of the seismic signal." @default.
• W1980852356 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1980852356 creator A5008959349 @default.
• W1980852356 creator A5012036685 @default.
• W1980852356 creator A5028000776 @default.
• W1980852356 creator A5038340091 @default.
• W1980852356 date "2007-04-15" @default.
• W1980852356 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1980852356 title "Using Seismic Attributes in Petrophysical Reservoir Characterization" @default.
• W1980852356 doi "https://doi.org/10.2118/107935-ms" @default.
• W1980852356 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W1980852356 type Work @default.
• W1980852356 sameAs 1980852356 @default.
• W1980852356 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W1980852356 countsByYear W19808523562015 @default.
• W1980852356 countsByYear W19808523562021 @default.
• W1980852356 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W1980852356 hasAuthorship W1980852356A5008959349 @default.
• W1980852356 hasAuthorship W1980852356A5012036685 @default.
• W1980852356 hasAuthorship W1980852356A5028000776 @default.
• W1980852356 hasAuthorship W1980852356A5038340091 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConcept C124101348 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConcept C14641988 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConcept C159737794 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConcept C165205528 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConcept C187320778 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConcept C2779483780 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConcept C2781181686 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConcept C2781294565 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConcept C39267094 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConcept C46293882 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConcept C64370902 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConcept C6648577 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConcept C78762247 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConceptScore W1980852356C105795698 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConceptScore W1980852356C124101348 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConceptScore W1980852356C127313418 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConceptScore W1980852356C14641988 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConceptScore W1980852356C151730666 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConceptScore W1980852356C159737794 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConceptScore W1980852356C165205528 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConceptScore W1980852356C187320778 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConceptScore W1980852356C2524010 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConceptScore W1980852356C2779483780 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConceptScore W1980852356C2781181686 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConceptScore W1980852356C2781294565 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConceptScore W1980852356C33923547 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConceptScore W1980852356C39267094 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConceptScore W1980852356C41008148 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConceptScore W1980852356C46293882 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConceptScore W1980852356C64370902 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConceptScore W1980852356C6648577 @default.
• W1980852356 hasConceptScore W1980852356C78762247 @default.
• W1980852356 hasLocation W19808523561 @default.
• W1980852356 hasOpenAccess W1980852356 @default.
• W1980852356 hasPrimaryLocation W19808523561 @default.
• W1980852356 hasRelatedWork W1977930981 @default.
• W1980852356 hasRelatedWork W2021186304 @default.
• W1980852356 hasRelatedWork W2051701013 @default.
• W1980852356 hasRelatedWork W2074413178 @default.
• W1980852356 hasRelatedWork W2082362683 @default.
• W1980852356 hasRelatedWork W2093775402 @default.
• W1980852356 hasRelatedWork W2899726959 @default.
• W1980852356 hasRelatedWork W2901919002 @default.
• W1980852356 hasRelatedWork W2999994641 @default.
• W1980852356 hasRelatedWork W3215723174 @default.
• W1980852356 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1980852356 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1980852356 magId "1980852356" @default.
• W1980852356 workType "article" @default.