FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1981105757> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1981105757 endingPage "061701" @default.
• W1981105757 startingPage "061701" @default.
• W1981105757 abstract "Purpose: The recently updated guidelines for dosimetry in brachytherapy in TG-186 have recommended the use of model-based dosimetry calculations as a replacement for TG-43. TG-186 highlights shortcomings in the water-based approach in TG-43, particularly for low energy brachytherapy sources. The Xoft Axxent is a low energy (<50 kV) brachytherapy system used in accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). Breast tissue is a heterogeneous tissue in terms of density and composition. Dosimetric calculations of seven APBI patients treated with Axxent were made using a model-based Monte Carlo platform for a number of tissue models and dose reporting methods and compared to TG-43 based plans. Methods: A model of the Axxent source, the S700, was created and validated against experimental data. CT scans of the patients were used to create realistic multi-tissue/heterogeneous models with breast tissue segmented using a published technique. Alternative water models were used to isolate the influence of tissue heterogeneity and backscatter on the dose distribution. Dose calculations were performed using Geant4 according to the original treatment parameters. The effect of the Axxent balloon applicator used in APBI which could not be modeled in the CT-based model, was modeled using a novel technique that utilizes CAD-based geometries. These techniques were validated experimentally. Results were calculated using two dose reporting methods, dose to water (Dw,m) and dose to medium (Dm,m), for the heterogeneous simulations. All results were compared against TG-43-based dose distributions and evaluated using dose ratio maps and DVH metrics. Changes in skin and PTV dose were highlighted. Results: All simulated heterogeneous models showed a reduced dose to the DVH metrics that is dependent on the method of dose reporting and patient geometry. Based on a prescription dose of 34 Gy, the average D90 to PTV was reduced by between ∼4% and ∼40%, depending on the scoring method, compared to the TG-43 result. Peak skin dose is also reduced by 10%–15% due to the absence of backscatter not accounted for in TG-43. The balloon applicator also contributed to the reduced dose. Other ROIs showed a difference depending on the method of dose reporting. Conclusions: TG-186-based calculations produce results that are different from TG-43 for the Axxent source. The differences depend strongly on the method of dose reporting. This study highlights the importance of backscatter to peak skin dose. Tissue heterogeneities, applicator, and patient geometries demonstrate the need for a more robust dose calculation method for low energy brachytherapy sources." @default.
• W1981105757 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1981105757 creator A5043363818 @default.
• W1981105757 creator A5046873980 @default.
• W1981105757 creator A5049072127 @default.
• W1981105757 creator A5059308102 @default.
• W1981105757 creator A5061731768 @default.
• W1981105757 creator A5063945256 @default.
• W1981105757 creator A5075218980 @default.
• W1981105757 creator A5089792965 @default.
• W1981105757 date "2014-05-02" @default.
• W1981105757 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
• W1981105757 title "Comparison of TG-43 and TG-186 in breast irradiation using a low energy electronic brachytherapy source" @default.
• W1981105757 cites W1968282970 @default.
• W1981105757 cites W1969066743 @default.
• W1981105757 cites W1981075188 @default.
• W1981105757 cites W1981177741 @default.
• W1981105757 cites W1988155005 @default.
• W1981105757 cites W2000118831 @default.
• W1981105757 cites W2008248783 @default.
• W1981105757 cites W2009183362 @default.
• W1981105757 cites W2030527204 @default.
• W1981105757 cites W2040350756 @default.
• W1981105757 cites W2041891618 @default.
• W1981105757 cites W2049509564 @default.
• W1981105757 cites W2051131197 @default.
• W1981105757 cites W2058173513 @default.
• W1981105757 cites W2064057265 @default.
• W1981105757 cites W2072461333 @default.
• W1981105757 cites W2073116238 @default.
• W1981105757 cites W2076228530 @default.
• W1981105757 cites W2079536624 @default.
• W1981105757 cites W2081567006 @default.
• W1981105757 cites W2089573650 @default.
• W1981105757 cites W2091850610 @default.
• W1981105757 cites W2119885740 @default.
• W1981105757 cites W2123934092 @default.
• W1981105757 cites W2127552707 @default.
• W1981105757 cites W2128158076 @default.
• W1981105757 cites W2146220967 @default.
• W1981105757 cites W2146764648 @default.
• W1981105757 cites W2148317584 @default.
• W1981105757 cites W2149273876 @default.
• W1981105757 doi "https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4873319" @default.
• W1981105757 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24877796" @default.
• W1981105757 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W1981105757 type Work @default.
• W1981105757 sameAs 1981105757 @default.
• W1981105757 citedByCount "28" @default.
• W1981105757 countsByYear W19811057572015 @default.
• W1981105757 countsByYear W19811057572016 @default.
• W1981105757 countsByYear W19811057572017 @default.
• W1981105757 countsByYear W19811057572018 @default.
• W1981105757 countsByYear W19811057572020 @default.
• W1981105757 countsByYear W19811057572021 @default.
• W1981105757 countsByYear W19811057572023 @default.
• W1981105757 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1981105757 hasAuthorship W1981105757A5043363818 @default.
• W1981105757 hasAuthorship W1981105757A5046873980 @default.
• W1981105757 hasAuthorship W1981105757A5049072127 @default.
• W1981105757 hasAuthorship W1981105757A5059308102 @default.
• W1981105757 hasAuthorship W1981105757A5061731768 @default.
• W1981105757 hasAuthorship W1981105757A5063945256 @default.
• W1981105757 hasAuthorship W1981105757A5075218980 @default.
• W1981105757 hasAuthorship W1981105757A5089792965 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConcept C136229726 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConcept C19499675 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConcept C2777416452 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConcept C3020109028 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConcept C30354325 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConcept C555944384 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConcept C63007395 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConcept C75088862 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConcept C76155785 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConceptScore W1981105757C105795698 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConceptScore W1981105757C121608353 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConceptScore W1981105757C126322002 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConceptScore W1981105757C126838900 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConceptScore W1981105757C136229726 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConceptScore W1981105757C192562407 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConceptScore W1981105757C19499675 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConceptScore W1981105757C19527891 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConceptScore W1981105757C2777416452 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConceptScore W1981105757C2989005 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConceptScore W1981105757C3020109028 @default.
• W1981105757 hasConceptScore W1981105757C30354325 @default.

• next