FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1981152783> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1981152783 endingPage "12" @default.
• W1981152783 startingPage "10" @default.
• W1981152783 abstract "HomeCirculation ResearchVol. 106, No. 1NEMO Nuances NF-κB Free AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBNEMO Nuances NF-κB Andriy Nemchenko and Joseph A. Hill Andriy NemchenkoAndriy Nemchenko From the Departments of Internal Medicine (Cardiology) (A.N., J.A.H.) and Molecular Biology (J.A.H.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas. Search for more papers by this author and Joseph A. HillJoseph A. Hill From the Departments of Internal Medicine (Cardiology) (A.N., J.A.H.) and Molecular Biology (J.A.H.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas. Search for more papers by this author Originally published8 Jan 2010https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.211185Circulation Research. 2010;106:10–12Stress-induced adverse remodeling of the myocardium is a major mechanism leading to heart failure, a leading and rapidly escalating source of morbidity and mortality worldwide.1,2 As a result, much work is underway to dissect molecular mechanisms governing cardiac remodeling in hopes of identifying novel therapeutic targets. In recent years, much of this work has focused on the hypertrophic growth response of the cardiac myocyte. Initially adaptive, cardiac hypertrophy compensates for declines in cardiac performance and increases in wall stress; sustained hypertrophy, however, is a major risk factor for emergence of systolic dysfunction and clinical heart failure.3 On the bright side, numerous preclinical studies have demonstrated that abrogation of the hypertrophic response is well tolerated, and even beneficial.4One potential target of therapy in the pathologically remodeled, hypertrophied heart is the transcription factor nuclear factor (NF)-κB. First discovered more than 20 years ago, NF-κB has been linked to numerous neurohormonal, pathophysiological, and stress stimuli responses, and it has been characterized most extensively in the immune system. In the heart, activation of NF-κB-dependent transcription has been detected in numerous disease contexts, including hypertrophy, ischemia/reperfusion injury, myocardial infarction, allograft rejection, myocarditis, apoptosis, and more.5,6 Within coronary vessels, NF-κB has been implicated in atherosclerosis and restenosis.5,6 However, parsing the specific role(s) of NF-κB in these diverse disease processes has been hampered by the embryonic lethality of inactivation of several NF-κB components.7–9In heart, the NF-κB family of transcription factors comprises 4 members: p50, p52, p65, and RelB. All are capable of multimerization, forming either homo- or heterodimers, but the ubiquitously expressed p50 and p65 (herein termed NF-κB) are responsible for the majority of NF-κB binding activity in the myocardium. Activation of cytoplasmic NF-κB requires phosphorylation and subsequent proteasome-dependent degradation of its repressor, inhibitor of κB (IκB). The essential step in this so-called canonical pathway, degradation of IκB, is initiated by a multicomponent IκB kinase (IKK) complex, comprising a regulatory scaffolding subunit NEMO (NF-κB essential modifier) (also known as IKKγ) and 2 catalytic subunits, IKKα and IKKβ. Then, the p50/p65 complex, released from the repressive influence of IκB, migrates to the nucleus, where it binds cognate DNA sequences (κB sites) in target genes.The NF-κB response is often transient, because it is governed by at least 2 negative feedback loops. In one, the protein IκBα, a product of NF-κB transcription, binds NF-κB, and the newly formed IκBα/NF-κB complex is translocated out of the nucleus, obviating NF-κB-dependent gene transcription. In another, the NF-κB-responsive, zinc finger protein A20 inhibits initiation of the NF-κB cascade by inactivating IKK in the cytoplasm. In addition, p50/p50 homodimers can attenuate NF-κB transactivation.10,11 Thus, expression of NF-κB-dependent genes is tightly regulated by multiple, interlacing control processes.In the myocardium, it remains puzzling the extent to which NF-κB promotes cell survival or cell death. Some evidence points to important cardioprotective effects. For example, NF-κB activation attenuates the hypertrophic response to pressure overload,12 minimizes infarct size during late-phase ischemic preconditioning,13 and lowers tumor necrosis factor-α-dependent apoptotic myocyte death.14 By contrast, other evidence suggests that cardioprotection can be brought about by blocking essential components of the NF-κB pathway; suppression of the NF-κB cascade decreases cardiac hypertrophy15–17 and prevents stress-induced ventricular dilation.15,16,18,19 In addition, NF-κB activation is required for doxorubicin-induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis.20 Clearly, the multifaceted roles of NF-κB in the heart require clarification.NF-κB is so pleiotropic that it has traditionally been considered a “general,” nonspecific transcription factor: a diverse array of stimuli activates NF-κB, and NF-κB, in turn, regulates more than 200 genes. More recent evidence, however, suggests that NF-κB serves as a nodal point of signaling, governing a network of circuits to integrate sundry inputs and elicit precise outputs via specific downstream targets. Consistent with this is our ever-growing understanding of the complexity of NF-κB feedback and feedforward control loops. Very recently, microRNAs have entered the NF-κB control picture.21 This work has uncovered an entire network of genes involved in cardiovascular development and reprogramming enriched for NF-κB binding sites in their proximal promoter regions.Much of the work to delineate NF-κB functions in heart has been conducted using transgenic models of cardiac-specific expression of mutant p50 and/or unphosphorylatable (undegradable) IκB. However, conclusions drawn from these studies have been conflicting.12,13,15–18 For example, 2 independent groups studying mice exposed to ischemic stimuli and harboring degradation-resistant IκB mutants reported that NF-κB can be either maladaptive22 or cardioprotective.23 Although this discrepancy may stem from differences in severity of the stresses used (ischemia/reperfusion versus permanent coronary artery occlusion),5 the diametrically opposing results are nonetheless puzzling. In light of this, development of novel genetically manipulated animal models targeting other components of the cardiac NF-κB machinery is welcome.In this issue of Circulation Research, Kratsios et al24 report the effects of cardiomyocyte-specific ablation of NEMO, an essential activator of NF-κB. Their elegant study demonstrates that inactivating NEMO in cardiac myocytes depletes cells of NF-κB-dependent antioxidant machinery. As a consequence, cells undergo spontaneous pathological remodeling, and load-induced changes are accelerated. Inactivation of NF-κB signaling by cardiac-specific ablation of NEMO led to attenuation of several antioxidant genes and associated accumulation of reactive oxygen species. The study went on to provide additional support for the role of oxidant stress in NEMO-deficient hearts with experiments in which mutant mice were fed chow supplemented with the antioxidant molecule butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA). BHA-supplemented diet afforded partial protection to NEMO-deficient cardiomyocytes. However, it failed to completely abrogate apoptotic cell death, cardiac fibrosis, and contractile dysfunction.This study has provided important new insights into the oftentimes puzzling world of NF-κB biology in the heart. Importantly, the findings are consistent with earlier reports demonstrating that Mn-superoxide dismutase, an essential antioxidant protein, is negatively regulated by p53, a downstream target repressed by NF-κB.25 However, important questions remain to be resolved.First, the actions of the NEMO protein itself are multifaceted. For example, NF-κB-mediated responses to DNA damage depend on their activation by nuclear NEMO.26 Furthermore, an essential feature of the role of NEMO in this, as well as in canonical NF-κB pathway activation, is its potential for posttranslational modifications. At present, Lys285, Lys321, Lys325, Lys326, and Lys399 within NEMO have been identified as sites modified with Lys63-linked polyubiquitin chains in response to various stimuli.27 In contrast to well-characterized Lys48 ubiquitin linkages, which serve as a signal for proteasomal degradation, Lys63-linked polyubiquitin chains function in signaling, protein-protein interactions and recognition, and DNA repair.27,28 Furthermore, Lys277 and -309 can be modified by either ubiquitin or SUMO-1 (small ubiquitin-like modifier-1).The biology of NEMO is yet more complex in light of recent reports demonstrating that it can undergo modifications by so-called “linear” polyubiquitin chains.27,29 Interestingly, linearly polyubiquitinated NEMO is stable and not degraded by the proteasome, and evidence suggests that this posttranslational modification may function as a platform for the binding of additional proteins.27,29 Also, it has been demonstrated recently that some proteins can be conjugated with multiple polyubiquitin chains with different ubiquitin-linkages.30 Therefore, it seems plausible that specific combinations of these polyubiquitin chains may modulate the function of NEMO to determine and direct specific NF-κB signaling outputs in a given context.In light of these facts, the NEMO mutant complements the arsenal of existing mouse models with abrogated NF-κB signaling in the heart (ie, IκB degradation-resistant mutants). Because NEMO acts upstream of IκB in NF-κB activation, this model may provide new insights into the integration of NF-κB-activating signals and the selectivity of the output(s) of the NF-κB-dependent transcriptional network. Additional complexity in NEMO-dependent NF-κB activation is highlighted by the fact that NEMO harbors at least 7 reported sites for posttranscriptional modification. Up to the present time, the majority of studies have been based on systems where NF-κB activation was abolished. Moving forward, studies designed to decipher more granular aspects of this critical pathway will be welcome.Thus, it is not certain that ablation of NEMO, and the consequent effects on cardiac remodeling, derive exclusively from the NF-κB-silencing actions of NEMO mutants, as it cannot be excluded that NEMO has actions on other, yet unknown, pathways. As a case in point, some evidence suggests that NEMO has IKK/NF-κB-independent functions besides its role in DNA damage responses. For example, nuclear-localized NEMO can bind competitively to the important coactivator CBP (CREB binding protein)31; NEMO promotes interaction of CBP with hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)2α, thereby enhancing transcriptional activity of HIF2α.32 An additional novel role for NEMO in blocking cell death, independent of its role in NF-κB signaling, is NEMO-dependent restraint of RIP1 (receptor interacting protein kinase 1), a potent apoptotic inducer protein, from engaging caspase 8.33 Finally, in studies of this nature, it is impossible to exclude the existence of secondary, compensatory responses to NEMO inactivation that alter combinatorial interactions between NF-κB and other transcription factors.Twenty years of research has revealed a plethora of important actions of NF-κB in the governance of numerous cellular functions. Yet, elucidating its effects in the myocardium has remained elusive. Now, the report24 by Kratsios et al has moved the field forward, providing important new insights into the multi-layered network of NF-κB-dependent transcription in the heart. This new information takes us one step further toward the ultimate goal of harnessing the cardioprotective effects of NF-κB for therapeutic gain. Table 1. Non-standard Abbreviations and AcronymsIκBinhibitor of κBIKKinhibitor of κB kinaseNEMOnuclear factor κB essential modifierNF-κBnuclear factor κBThe opinions expressed in this editorial are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.Sources of FundingSupported by grants from the NIH (HL-075173; HL-080144; HL-090842), American Heart Association (0640084N), and the American Heart Association-Jon Holden DeHaan Foundation.DisclosuresNone.FootnotesCorrespondence to Joseph A. Hill, MD, PhD, Division of Cardiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, NB11.200, 6000 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-8573. E-mail [email protected] References 1 Hill JA, Olson EN. Cardiac plasticity. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358: 1370–1380.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2 Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, De Simone G, Ferguson TB, Flegal K, Ford E, Furie K, Go A, Greenlund K, Haase N, Hailpern S, Ho M, Howard V, Kissela B, Kittner S, Lackland D, Lisabeth L, Marelli A, McDermott M, Meigs J, Mozaffarian D, Nichol G, O'Donnell C, Roger V, Rosamond W, Sacco R, Sorlie P, Stafford R, Steinberger J, Thom T, Wasserthiel-Smoller S, Wong N, Wylie-Rosett J, Hong Y. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2009; 119: 480–486.LinkGoogle Scholar3 Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, Kannel WB, Castelli WP. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. N Engl J Med. 1990; 322: 1561–1566.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4 Frey N, Katus HA, Olson EN, Hill JA. Hypertrophy of the heart: a new therapeutic target? Circulation. 2004; 109: 1580–1589.LinkGoogle Scholar5 Jones WK, Brown M, Wilhide M, He SW, Ren XP. NF-kappa B in cardiovascular disease - diverse and specific effects of a “general” transcription factor? Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2005; 5: 183–201.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6 Hall G, Hasday JD, Rogers TB. Regulating the regulator: NF-kappa B signaling in heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2006; 41: 580–591.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7 Beg AA, Sha WC, Bronson RT, Ghosh S, Baltimore D. Embryonic lethality and liver degeneration in mice lacking the RelA component of NF-kappa B. Nature. 1995; 376: 167–170.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8 Li Q, Van Antwerp D, Mercurio F, Lee KF, Verma IM. Severe liver degeneration in mice lacking the IkappaB kinase 2 gene. Science. 1999; 284: 321–325.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9 Tanaka M, Fuentes ME, Yamaguchi K, Durnin MH, Dalrymple SA, Hardy KL, Goeddel DV. Embryonic lethality, liver degeneration, and impaired NF-kappa B activation in IKK-beta-deficient mice. Immunity. 1999; 10: 421–429.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10 Grundstrom S, Anderson P, Scheipers P, Sundstedt A. Bcl-3 and NF kappa B p50-p50 homodimers act as transcriptional repressors in tolerant CD4(+) T cells. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279: 8460–8468.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar11 Guan HC, Hou SH, Ricciardi RP. DNA binding of repressor nuclear factor-kappa B p50/p50 depends on phosphorylation of Ser(337) by the protein kinase A catalytic subunit. J Biol Chem. 2005; 280: 9957–9962.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12 Hikoso S, Yamaguchi O, Nakano Y, Takeda T, Omiya S, Mizote I, Taneike M, Oka T, Tamai T, Oyabu J, Uno Y, Matsumura Y, Nishida K, Suzuki K, Kogo M, Hori M, Otsu K. The IκB kinase {beta}/nuclear factor κB signaling pathway protects the heart from hemodynamic stress mediated by the regulation of manganese superoxide dismutase expression. Circ Res. 2009; 105: 70–79.LinkGoogle Scholar13 Li QH, Guo YR, Tan W, Ou QH, Wu WJ, Sturza D, Dawn B, Hunt G, Cui C, Bolli R. Cardioprotection afforded by inducible nitric oxide synthase gene therapy is mediated by cyclooxygenase-2 via a nuclear factor-kappa B-dependent pathway. Circulation. 2007; 116: 1577–1584.LinkGoogle Scholar14 Mustapha S, Kirshner A, De Moissac D, Kirshenbaum LA. A direct requirement of nuclear factor-kappa B for suppression of apoptosis in ventricular myocytes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000; 279: H939–H945.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar15 Gupta S, Young D, Maitra RK, Gupta A, Popovic ZB, Yong SL, Mahajan A, Wang Q, Sen S. Prevention of cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure by silencing of NF-kappa B. J Mol Biol. 2008; 375: 637–649.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar16 Young D, Popovic ZB, Jones WK, Gupta S. Blockade of NF-kappa B using I kappa B alpha dominant-negative mice ameliorates cardiac hypertrophy in myotrophin-overexpressed transgenic mice. J Mol Biol. 2008; 381: 559–568.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar17 Wu SJ, Yin R, Ernest R, Li YQ, Zhelyabovska O, Luo JW, Yang YF, Yang QL. Liver X receptors are negative regulators of cardiac hypertrophy via suppressing NF-kappa B signalling. Cardiovasc Res. 2009; 84: 119–126.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar18 Trescher K, Bernecker O, Fellner B, Gyongyosi M, Schafer R, Aharinejad S, DeMartin R, Wolner E, Podesser BK. Inflammation and postinfarct remodeling: overexpression of IKB prevents ventricular dilation via increasing TIMP levels. Cardiovasc Res. 2006; 69: 746–754.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar19 Hedhli N, Lizano P, Hong C, Fritzky LF, Dhar SK, Liu H, Tian Y, Gao S, Madura K, Vatner SF, Depre C. Proteasome inhibition decreases cardiac remodeling after initiation of pressure overload. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008; 295: H1385–H1393.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar20 Wang ZB, Castresana MR, Detmer K, Newman WH. An I kappa B-alpha mutant inhibits cytokine gene expression and proliferation in human vascular smooth muscle cells. J Surg Res. 2002; 102: 198–206.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar21 Naga Prasad SV, Duan ZH, Gupta MK, Surampudi VS, Volinia S, Calin GA, Liu CG, Kotwal A, Moravec CS, Starling RC, Perez DM, Sen S, Wu Q, Plow EF, Croce CM, Karnik S. Unique microRNA profile in end-stage heart failure indicates alterations in specific cardiovascular signaling networks. J Biol Chem. 2009; 284: 27487–27499.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar22 Brown M, McGuinness M, Wright T, Ren X, Wang Y, Boivin GP, Hahn H, Feldman AM, Jones WK. Cardiac-specific blockade of NF-kappaB in cardiac pathophysiology: differences between acute and chronic stimuli in vivo. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005; 289: H466–H476.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar23 Misra A, Haudek SB, Knuefermann P, Vallejo JG, Chen ZJ, Michael LH, Sivasubramanian N, Olson EN, Entman ML, Mann DL. Nuclear factor-kappaB protects the adult cardiac myocyte against ischemia-induced apoptosis in a murine model of acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2003; 108: 3075–3078.LinkGoogle Scholar24 Kratsios P, Huth M, Al Banchaabouchi M, Sgoifo A, Manghi M, Salimova E, Suzuki K, Rosenthal N, Mourkioti F. Antioxidant amelioration of dilated cardiomyopathy caused by conditional deletion of NEMO/IKKγ in cardiomyocytes. Circ Res. 2010; 106: 133–144.LinkGoogle Scholar25 Sano M, Minamino T, Toko H, Miyauchi H, Orimo M, Qin YJ, Akazawa H, Tateno K, Kayama Y, Harada M, Shimizu I, Asahara T, Hamada H, Tomita S, Molkentin JD, Zou YZ, Komuro I. p53-induced inhibition of Hif-1 causes cardiac dysfunction during pressure overload. Nature. 2007; 446: 444–448.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar26 Chiu YH, Zhao M, Chen ZJ. Ubiquitin in NF-kappa B signaling. Chem Rev. 2009; 109: 1549–1560.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar27 Tokunaga F, Sakata S, Saeki Y, Satomi Y, Kirisako T, Kamei K, Nakagawa T, Kato M, Murata S, Yamaoka S, Yamamoto M, Akira S, Takao T, Tanaka K, Iwai K. Involvement of linear polyubiquitylation of NEMO in NF-kappa B activation. Nat Cell Biol. 2009; 11: U123–U140.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar28 Laplantine E, Fontan E, Chiaravalli J, Lopez T, Lakisic G, Veron M, Agou F, Israel A. NEMO specifically recognizes K63-linked poly-ubiquitin chains through a new bipartite ubiquitin-binding domain. EMBO J. 2009; 28: 2885–2895.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar29 Iwai K, Tokunaga F. Linear polyubiquitination: a new regulator of NF-kappa B activation. EMBO Rep. 2009; 10: 706–713.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar30 Newton K, Matsumoto ML, Wertz IE, Kirkpatrick DS, Lill JR, Tan J, Dugger D, Gordon N, Sidhu SS, Fellouse FA, Komuves L, French DM, Ferrando RE, Lam C, Compaan D, Yu C, Bosanac I, Hymowitz SG, Kelley RF, Dixit VM. Ubiquitin chain editing revealed by polyubiquitin linkage-specific antibodies. Cell. 2008; 134: 668–678.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar31 Verma UN, Yamamoto Y, Prajapati S, Gaynor RB. Nuclear role of I kappa B Kinase-gamma/NF-kappa B essential modulator (IKK gamma/NEMO) in NF-kappa B-dependent gene expression. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279: 3509–3515.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar32 Bracken CP, Whitelaw ML, Peet DJ. Activity of hypoxia-inducible factor 2 alpha is regulated by association with the NF-kappa B essential modulator. J Biol Chem. 2005; 280: 14240–14251.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar33 Legarda-Addison D, Hase H, O'Donnell MA, Ting AT. NEMO/IKK gamma regulates an early NF-kappa B-independent cell-death checkpoint during TNF signaling. Cell Death Differ. 2009; 16: 1279–1288.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Sun X, Huang Y, Si D, Gao S and Wang P (2019) Questionnaire survey on association between preeclampsia and incontinentia pigmenti, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 10.1111/jog.13983, 45:7, (1363-1370), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2019. Sakowicz A, Lisowska M, Biesiada L, Płuciennik E, Gach A, Rybak-Krzyszkowska M, Huras H, Sakowicz B, Romanowicz H, Piastowska-Ciesielska A, Grzesiak M and Pietrucha T (2019) Placental Expression of NEMO Protein in Normal Pregnancy and Preeclampsia, Disease Markers, 10.1155/2019/8418379, 2019, (1-12), Online publication date: 2-Jan-2019. Sakowicz A, Hejduk P, Pietrucha T, Nowakowska M, Płuciennik E, Pospiech K, Gach A, Rybak-Krzyszkowska M, Sakowicz B, Kaminski M, Krasomski G and Biesiada L (2016) Finding NEMO in preeclampsia, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.11.002, 214:4, (538.e1-538.e7), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2016. Thomas C, Yong Q, Rosa R, Seqqat R, Gopal S, Casarini D, Jones W, Gupta S, Baker K and Kumar R (2014) Cardiac-specific suppression of NF-κB signaling prevents diabetic cardiomyopathy via inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system, American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 10.1152/ajpheart.00340.2014, 307:7, (H1036-H1045), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2014. Keerthy H, Mohan C, Siveen K, Fuchs J, Rangappa S, Sundaram M, Li F, Girish K, Sethi G, Basappa , Bender A and Rangappa K (2014) Novel Synthetic Biscoumarins Target Tumor Necrosis Factor-α in Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Vitro and in Vivo, Journal of Biological Chemistry, 10.1074/jbc.M114.593855, 289:46, (31879-31890), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2014. Sakowicz A, Pietrucha T, Rybak-Krzyszkowska M, Huras H, Gach A, Sakowicz B, Banaszczyk M, Grzesiak M, Biesiada L and Kanellopoulos-Langevin C (2017) Double hit of NEMO gene in preeclampsia, PLOS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0180065, 12:6, (e0180065) January 8, 2010Vol 106, Issue 1 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.211185PMID: 20056939 Originally publishedJanuary 8, 2010 Keywordsoxidative stresscardiomyocyteROSNF-κBPDF download Advertisement" @default.
• W1981152783 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1981152783 creator A5001744471 @default.
• W1981152783 creator A5081821816 @default.
• W1981152783 date "2010-01-08" @default.
• W1981152783 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W1981152783 title "NEMO Nuances NF-κB" @default.
• W1981152783 cites W1513960270 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W1572734717 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W178764317 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W1972532256 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W1982062664 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W2007705378 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W2007731525 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W2008646773 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W2018183883 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W2018802599 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W2029276500 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W2031206331 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W2032383673 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W2039367380 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W2041043528 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W2043400545 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W2043790885 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W2050312701 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W2053372168 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W2081682917 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W2089796386 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W2092322021 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W2097707234 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W2107544067 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W2132991256 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W2134760231 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W2136426056 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W2138940604 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W2143824990 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W2148597785 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W2165255755 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W2334499091 @default.
• W1981152783 cites W4232767515 @default.
• W1981152783 doi "https://doi.org/10.1161/circresaha.109.211185" @default.
• W1981152783 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3613491" @default.
• W1981152783 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20056939" @default.
• W1981152783 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W1981152783 type Work @default.
• W1981152783 sameAs 1981152783 @default.
• W1981152783 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W1981152783 countsByYear W19811527832014 @default.
• W1981152783 countsByYear W19811527832016 @default.
• W1981152783 countsByYear W19811527832017 @default.
• W1981152783 countsByYear W19811527832019 @default.
• W1981152783 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1981152783 hasAuthorship W1981152783A5001744471 @default.
• W1981152783 hasAuthorship W1981152783A5081821816 @default.
• W1981152783 hasBestOaLocation W19811527831 @default.
• W1981152783 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1981152783 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W1981152783 hasConcept C2776914184 @default.
• W1981152783 hasConcept C2777730290 @default.
• W1981152783 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1981152783 hasConceptScore W1981152783C126322002 @default.
• W1981152783 hasConceptScore W1981152783C185592680 @default.
• W1981152783 hasConceptScore W1981152783C2776914184 @default.
• W1981152783 hasConceptScore W1981152783C2777730290 @default.
• W1981152783 hasConceptScore W1981152783C71924100 @default.
• W1981152783 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W1981152783 hasLocation W19811527831 @default.
• W1981152783 hasLocation W19811527832 @default.
• W1981152783 hasLocation W19811527833 @default.
• W1981152783 hasLocation W19811527834 @default.
• W1981152783 hasOpenAccess W1981152783 @default.
• W1981152783 hasPrimaryLocation W19811527831 @default.
• W1981152783 hasRelatedWork W1531601525 @default.
• W1981152783 hasRelatedWork W2319480705 @default.
• W1981152783 hasRelatedWork W2384464875 @default.
• W1981152783 hasRelatedWork W2606230654 @default.
• W1981152783 hasRelatedWork W2607424097 @default.
• W1981152783 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W1981152783 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W1981152783 hasRelatedWork W2948807893 @default.
• W1981152783 hasRelatedWork W3031052312 @default.
• W1981152783 hasRelatedWork W2778153218 @default.
• W1981152783 hasVolume "106" @default.
• W1981152783 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1981152783 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1981152783 magId "1981152783" @default.
• W1981152783 workType "article" @default.