Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1981242788> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W1981242788 endingPage "582" @default.
- W1981242788 startingPage "559" @default.
- W1981242788 abstract "Renaissance Thought on the Celestial Hierarchy:The Decline of a Tradition? Feisal G. Mohamed The Dionysian arrangement of the angels was dismantled on the one hand because its author was increasingly regarded as a counterfait, and on the other hand because Protestants upheld the Bible's supremacy over all the vain babblings of idle men. In consequence, those who like Spenser celebrated the trinall triplicities, look back upon a great past that had provided a vision hallowed by time and graced by an impressive array of intellects. —C. A. Patrides1 It has been some forty years now since C. A. Patrides first argued in these pages that English Renaissance views on the celestial hierarchy constitute the decline of a tradition, an argument made so convincing by his encyclopedic articles on the subject that scholars have been content to accept it. Indeed there is a good deal of evidence suggesting that the tradition of the ninefold hierarchy of angels associated with the Pseudo-Dionysius suffered serious injury at the hands of the Renaissance and Reformation. Subjected to the scrutiny of Renaissance scholarship and in light of the rediscovery of several Neoplatonists, particularly Proclus, it became quite clear that the Corpus Dionysiacum had been written centuries later than its author pretended. In the mid-fifteenth century Lorenzo Valla argued that because the Areopagus was a legal rather than a philosophical assembly, because none of the Greek or Latin fathers make mention of Dionysius, and because the claim in the letter to Polycarp to have witnessed [End Page 559] in Heliopolis the solar eclipse at the moment of Christ's death is a clear fabrication, placement of the Corpus in the first century should be doubted.2 These suggestions went largely unnoticed until Desiderius Erasmus, returning from England (where William Grocyn had begun murmurs regarding the Areopagitic origin of the Corpus), discovered in Louvain a manuscript of Valla's commentary on the book of Acts and incorporated its conclusions in his influential annotations on the New Testament.3 The discovery of Dionysius's pseudonymity and Erasmus's suggestion that Dionysian ceremonies could no longer be connected to the apostolic church would damage permanently the now Pseudo-Areopagite's influence. In a classic case of complicity between Renaissance humanism and Reformation theology—both Protestant and Catholic, it must be stressed—the sixteenth century turned away from Dionysian thought in general and from The Celestial Hierarchy in particular. The interrogation of apostolic origin begun by prominent Catholic thinkers like Erasmus and Cardinal Cajetan was most convenient to reformers like Martin Luther and John Calvin, both of whom described the author of the Corpus as Dionysius, whoever he was.4 Such an open-and-shut presentation of sixteenth-century Dionysiana, however, ignores several factors. One of them is that Renaissance scholars were not the first to question the dating of the Corpus: Peter Abelard fueled general perception of his heretical tendencies by suggesting that Dionysius may not have been the Pauline convert mentioned in the Acts of the Apostles.5 Much more important, however, is the number of Renaissance scholars for whom Dionysius was a formative influence. Despite his stance on the authenticity of the Corpus, Lorenzo Valla describes Dionysius in the peroration to his Encomium Sancti Thomae Aquinatis as playing the flute in a celestial symphony before the throne of God.6 For Nicholas Cusanus, as F. Edward Cranz describes [End Page 560] it, Dionysius is the most important Christian theologian with no runner-up who is even close.7 Giovanni Pico della Mirandola saw Dionysius's writings as following directly from the teachings of Paul.8 Marsilio Ficino employed Dionysius in his comments on angels in the Theologia Platonica, translated and commented on The Divine Names and The Mystical Theology, and consistently endorsed first-century dating of the Corpus Dionysiacum.9 Ambrogio Traversari, who described Dionysius as Apostoli disciplus, would also produce a fresh translation acceptable to humanist tastes in 1437, which would receive wide dissemination in the 1499 edition produced by Jacques Lefèvre d'Étaples.10 Lefèvre saw the Corpus as apostolic in origin and authority and went so far as to endorse the traditional conflation of Dionysius with Saint..." @default.
- W1981242788 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1981242788 creator A5059974124 @default.
- W1981242788 date "2004-01-01" @default.
- W1981242788 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W1981242788 title "Renaissance Thought on the Celestial Hierarchy: The Decline of a Tradition?" @default.
- W1981242788 cites W1489429373 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W1504974504 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W1531118520 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W1580597967 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W1592747651 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W1602839376 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W1604114279 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W2012987478 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W2015771961 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W2028271388 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W2030505466 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W2042385597 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W2045143969 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W2050976351 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W2054264143 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W2065399252 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W2091053588 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W2107007918 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W2136660877 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W2156309041 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W2319867041 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W2330077641 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W2331484586 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W2333889612 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W2461567076 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W2503934844 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W2505373897 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W2797211112 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W2799231928 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W286179355 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W287764284 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W2979686860 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W3120481907 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W33236230 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W354612675 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W430843427 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W562519952 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W594288051 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W606098551 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W634774751 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W648243876 @default.
- W1981242788 cites W651387527 @default.
- W1981242788 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2005.0018" @default.
- W1981242788 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
- W1981242788 type Work @default.
- W1981242788 sameAs 1981242788 @default.
- W1981242788 citedByCount "5" @default.
- W1981242788 countsByYear W19812427882012 @default.
- W1981242788 countsByYear W19812427882016 @default.
- W1981242788 countsByYear W19812427882018 @default.
- W1981242788 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1981242788 hasAuthorship W1981242788A5059974124 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConcept C2776050585 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConcept C2777855551 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConcept C2778061430 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConcept C2781119825 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConcept C31170391 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConcept C52069626 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConcept C74916050 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConceptScore W1981242788C124952713 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConceptScore W1981242788C138885662 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConceptScore W1981242788C142362112 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConceptScore W1981242788C161191863 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConceptScore W1981242788C17744445 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConceptScore W1981242788C185592680 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConceptScore W1981242788C199539241 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConceptScore W1981242788C27206212 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConceptScore W1981242788C2776050585 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConceptScore W1981242788C2777855551 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConceptScore W1981242788C2778061430 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConceptScore W1981242788C2781119825 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConceptScore W1981242788C31170391 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConceptScore W1981242788C41008148 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConceptScore W1981242788C52069626 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConceptScore W1981242788C52119013 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConceptScore W1981242788C55493867 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConceptScore W1981242788C74916050 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConceptScore W1981242788C95457728 @default.
- W1981242788 hasConceptScore W1981242788C98184364 @default.