FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1981909626> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1981909626 endingPage "1935" @default.
• W1981909626 startingPage "1926" @default.
• W1981909626 abstract "Purpose: Yittrium‐90 ( 90 Y) is traditionally thought of as a pure beta emitter, and is used in targeted radionuclide therapy, with imaging performed using bremsstrahlung single‐photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). However, because 90 Y also emits positrons through internal pair production with a very small branching ratio, positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is also available. Because of the insufficient image quality of 90 Y bremsstrahlung SPECT, PET imaging has been suggested as an alternative. In this paper, the authors present the Monte Carlo‐based simulation–reconstruction framework for 90 Y to comprehensively analyze the PET and SPECT imaging techniques and to quantitatively consider the disadvantages associated with them. Methods: Our PET and SPECT simulation modules were developed using Monte Carlo simulation of Electrons and Photons (MCEP), developed by Dr. S. Uehara. PET code (MCEP‐PET) generates a sinogram, and reconstructs the tomography image using a time‐of‐flight ordered subset expectation maximization (TOF‐OSEM) algorithm with attenuation compensation. To evaluate MCEP‐PET, simulated results of 18 F PET imaging were compared with the experimental results. The results confirmed that MCEP‐PET can simulate the experimental results very well. The SPECT code (MCEP‐SPECT) models the collimator and NaI detector system, and generates the projection images and projection data. To save the computational time, the authors adopt the prerecorded 90 Y bremsstrahlung photon data calculated by MCEP. The projection data are also reconstructed using the OSEM algorithm. The authors simulated PET and SPECT images of a water phantom containing six hot spheres filled with different concentrations of 90 Y without background activity. The amount of activity was 163 MBq, with an acquisition time of 40 min. Results: The simulated 90 Y‐PET image accurately simulated the experimental results. PET image is visually superior to SPECT image because of the low background noise. The simulation reveals that the detected photon number in SPECT is comparable to that of PET, but the large fraction (approximately 75%) of scattered and penetration photons contaminates SPECT image. The lower limit of 90 Y detection in SPECT image was approximately 200 kBq/ml, while that in PET image was approximately 100 kBq/ml. Conclusions: By comparing the background noise level and the image concentration profile of both the techniques, PET image quality was determined to be superior to that of bremsstrahlung SPECT. The developed simulation codes will be very useful in the future investigations of PET and bremsstrahlung SPECT imaging of 90 Y." @default.
• W1981909626 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1981909626 creator A5023321343 @default.
• W1981909626 creator A5056260434 @default.
• W1981909626 creator A5061571508 @default.
• W1981909626 creator A5067590340 @default.
• W1981909626 creator A5081253979 @default.
• W1981909626 creator A5086548929 @default.
• W1981909626 date "2015-03-26" @default.
• W1981909626 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W1981909626 title "Monte Carlo simulation of PET and SPECT imaging of⁹⁰Y" @default.
• W1981909626 cites W2002125370 @default.
• W1981909626 cites W2020567724 @default.
• W1981909626 cites W2038251310 @default.
• W1981909626 cites W2038253228 @default.
• W1981909626 cites W2088122925 @default.
• W1981909626 cites W2107990794 @default.
• W1981909626 cites W2109630681 @default.
• W1981909626 cites W2111329225 @default.
• W1981909626 cites W2127498681 @default.
• W1981909626 cites W2135371869 @default.
• W1981909626 cites W2138047215 @default.
• W1981909626 cites W2155585459 @default.
• W1981909626 cites W2156781004 @default.
• W1981909626 cites W2550855489 @default.
• W1981909626 cites W4360790397 @default.
• W1981909626 doi "https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4915545" @default.
• W1981909626 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25832083" @default.
• W1981909626 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1981909626 type Work @default.
• W1981909626 sameAs 1981909626 @default.
• W1981909626 citedByCount "16" @default.
• W1981909626 countsByYear W19819096262015 @default.
• W1981909626 countsByYear W19819096262016 @default.
• W1981909626 countsByYear W19819096262018 @default.
• W1981909626 countsByYear W19819096262019 @default.
• W1981909626 countsByYear W19819096262020 @default.
• W1981909626 countsByYear W19819096262021 @default.
• W1981909626 countsByYear W19819096262023 @default.
• W1981909626 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1981909626 hasAuthorship W1981909626A5023321343 @default.
• W1981909626 hasAuthorship W1981909626A5056260434 @default.
• W1981909626 hasAuthorship W1981909626A5061571508 @default.
• W1981909626 hasAuthorship W1981909626A5067590340 @default.
• W1981909626 hasAuthorship W1981909626A5081253979 @default.
• W1981909626 hasAuthorship W1981909626A5086548929 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConcept C104293457 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConcept C141379421 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConcept C159317903 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConcept C19499675 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConcept C2775842073 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConcept C2778064278 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConcept C2779200277 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConcept C2780441642 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConcept C2984398910 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConcept C31601959 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConcept C57493831 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConcept C81302155 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConceptScore W1981909626C104293457 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConceptScore W1981909626C105795698 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConceptScore W1981909626C11413529 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConceptScore W1981909626C120665830 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConceptScore W1981909626C121332964 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConceptScore W1981909626C141379421 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConceptScore W1981909626C154945302 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConceptScore W1981909626C159317903 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConceptScore W1981909626C19499675 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConceptScore W1981909626C19527891 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConceptScore W1981909626C2775842073 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConceptScore W1981909626C2778064278 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConceptScore W1981909626C2779200277 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConceptScore W1981909626C2780441642 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConceptScore W1981909626C2984398910 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConceptScore W1981909626C2989005 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConceptScore W1981909626C31601959 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConceptScore W1981909626C33923547 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConceptScore W1981909626C41008148 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConceptScore W1981909626C57493831 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConceptScore W1981909626C71924100 @default.
• W1981909626 hasConceptScore W1981909626C81302155 @default.
• W1981909626 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W1981909626 hasLocation W19819096261 @default.
• W1981909626 hasLocation W19819096262 @default.
• W1981909626 hasOpenAccess W1981909626 @default.
• W1981909626 hasPrimaryLocation W19819096261 @default.
• W1981909626 hasRelatedWork W1970980137 @default.
• W1981909626 hasRelatedWork W2041169553 @default.
• W1981909626 hasRelatedWork W2064312746 @default.

• next