FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1981946458> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1981946458 endingPage "63" @default.
• W1981946458 startingPage "59" @default.
• W1981946458 abstract "Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a new therapeutic option in patients with heart failure and ventricular conduction delay. We compared the long-term performance of left ventricular (LV) pacing via the coronary venous (CV) approach and a limited lateral thoracotomy (LLT). Data from 81 patients (age 65 ± 12 years; 52 men, New York Heart Association class 3.0 ± 0.4, ejection fraction 24 ± 6%) were retrospectively analyzed for 1 year after implantation of a CRT system. Twenty-five patients received LLT leads and 56 patients received CV leads. Postoperative hospitalization was shorter after CV lead implantation (8 ± 4 vs 12 ± 5 days, p <0.01). No significant differences in LV pacing and sensing performance between both approaches were observed after 12 months. Reinterventions were necessary in 7 patients after CV implantation compared with only 1 reintervention (4%) in the LLT group (p = NS). Postoperative chest radiographs revealed an anterior lead position in 11 of 25 patients (44%) in the LLT group versus 3 of 56 patients (5.4%) in the CV group (p = 0.00007). Echocardiographic data demonstrated a sig-nificant increase in LV ejection fraction in the CV group (from 26.1 ± 5.2% to 35.3 ± 14.3% at 12 months, p <0.001, n = 42) in contrast to the LLT group (from 24.5 ± 6.2% to 28.5 ± 7.5% at 12 months, p = NS, n = 16) at 12-month follow-up. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in 35 patients showed significantly more improvement in peak oxygen consumption after 12 months in the CV group (15.5 ± 3.1 vs 13.6 ± 2.6 ml/min/kg at implant, n = 22) compared with the LLT group (12.7 ± 1.5 vs 11.8 ml/min/kg at implant, n = 13, p = 0.004). At 1-year follow-up the mortality rate was 24% (6 of 25) after LLT lead implantation versus 12.5% (7 of 56) after CV implantation (p = NS). Our data show that the LLT approach for LV lead placement in CRT systems has the advantage of a lower incidence of reinterventions. Hospitalization was longer, increase in functional capacity smaller, and mortality at 1-year follow-up higher, which were potentially related to a more anterior lead position. Therefore, CV leads are preferable to LLT leads." @default.
• W1981946458 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1981946458 creator A5006650916 @default.
• W1981946458 creator A5023382668 @default.
• W1981946458 creator A5030002736 @default.
• W1981946458 creator A5049133383 @default.
• W1981946458 creator A5050652916 @default.
• W1981946458 creator A5052533904 @default.
• W1981946458 creator A5056963493 @default.
• W1981946458 creator A5088160089 @default.
• W1981946458 creator A5089915175 @default.
• W1981946458 creator A5091802529 @default.
• W1981946458 date "2004-07-01" @default.
• W1981946458 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W1981946458 title "Comparison of left ventricular lead placement via the coronary venous approach versus lateral thoracotomy in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy" @default.
• W1981946458 cites W1521293567 @default.
• W1981946458 cites W1977301303 @default.
• W1981946458 cites W2014537746 @default.
• W1981946458 cites W2015697923 @default.
• W1981946458 cites W2016804447 @default.
• W1981946458 cites W2035205163 @default.
• W1981946458 cites W2036363896 @default.
• W1981946458 cites W2049511322 @default.
• W1981946458 cites W2053172478 @default.
• W1981946458 cites W2074831861 @default.
• W1981946458 cites W2097177494 @default.
• W1981946458 cites W2127251235 @default.
• W1981946458 cites W2141875915 @default.
• W1981946458 cites W2144700130 @default.
• W1981946458 cites W2151443363 @default.
• W1981946458 cites W2159318323 @default.
• W1981946458 cites W2312567289 @default.
• W1981946458 cites W2567948445 @default.
• W1981946458 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.03.031" @default.
• W1981946458 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15219510" @default.
• W1981946458 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W1981946458 type Work @default.
• W1981946458 sameAs 1981946458 @default.
• W1981946458 citedByCount "88" @default.
• W1981946458 countsByYear W19819464582012 @default.
• W1981946458 countsByYear W19819464582013 @default.
• W1981946458 countsByYear W19819464582014 @default.
• W1981946458 countsByYear W19819464582015 @default.
• W1981946458 countsByYear W19819464582016 @default.
• W1981946458 countsByYear W19819464582017 @default.
• W1981946458 countsByYear W19819464582018 @default.
• W1981946458 countsByYear W19819464582020 @default.
• W1981946458 countsByYear W19819464582021 @default.
• W1981946458 countsByYear W19819464582023 @default.
• W1981946458 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1981946458 hasAuthorship W1981946458A5006650916 @default.
• W1981946458 hasAuthorship W1981946458A5023382668 @default.
• W1981946458 hasAuthorship W1981946458A5030002736 @default.
• W1981946458 hasAuthorship W1981946458A5049133383 @default.
• W1981946458 hasAuthorship W1981946458A5050652916 @default.
• W1981946458 hasAuthorship W1981946458A5052533904 @default.
• W1981946458 hasAuthorship W1981946458A5056963493 @default.
• W1981946458 hasAuthorship W1981946458A5088160089 @default.
• W1981946458 hasAuthorship W1981946458A5089915175 @default.
• W1981946458 hasAuthorship W1981946458A5091802529 @default.
• W1981946458 hasConcept C114793014 @default.
• W1981946458 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1981946458 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W1981946458 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W1981946458 hasConcept C2776034619 @default.
• W1981946458 hasConcept C2777093003 @default.
• W1981946458 hasConcept C2778198053 @default.
• W1981946458 hasConcept C2778847313 @default.
• W1981946458 hasConcept C3020135794 @default.
• W1981946458 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1981946458 hasConcept C78085059 @default.
• W1981946458 hasConceptScore W1981946458C114793014 @default.
• W1981946458 hasConceptScore W1981946458C126322002 @default.
• W1981946458 hasConceptScore W1981946458C127313418 @default.
• W1981946458 hasConceptScore W1981946458C164705383 @default.
• W1981946458 hasConceptScore W1981946458C2776034619 @default.
• W1981946458 hasConceptScore W1981946458C2777093003 @default.
• W1981946458 hasConceptScore W1981946458C2778198053 @default.
• W1981946458 hasConceptScore W1981946458C2778847313 @default.
• W1981946458 hasConceptScore W1981946458C3020135794 @default.
• W1981946458 hasConceptScore W1981946458C71924100 @default.
• W1981946458 hasConceptScore W1981946458C78085059 @default.
• W1981946458 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W1981946458 hasLocation W19819464581 @default.
• W1981946458 hasLocation W19819464582 @default.
• W1981946458 hasOpenAccess W1981946458 @default.
• W1981946458 hasPrimaryLocation W19819464581 @default.
• W1981946458 hasRelatedWork W2088188662 @default.
• W1981946458 hasRelatedWork W2107400784 @default.
• W1981946458 hasRelatedWork W2362265450 @default.
• W1981946458 hasRelatedWork W2369801253 @default.
• W1981946458 hasRelatedWork W2382547358 @default.
• W1981946458 hasRelatedWork W2915561147 @default.
• W1981946458 hasRelatedWork W2999204693 @default.
• W1981946458 hasRelatedWork W3031164927 @default.
• W1981946458 hasRelatedWork W4293037456 @default.
• W1981946458 hasRelatedWork W4315784592 @default.
• W1981946458 hasVolume "94" @default.

• next