FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1982362377> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1982362377 endingPage "465.e1" @default.
• W1982362377 startingPage "459" @default.
• W1982362377 abstract "Purpose To compare outcomes after bilateral and unilateral medial rectus (BMR/UMR) resection for the treatment of recurrent exotropia after bilateral lateral rectus (BLR) muscle recession. Design Retrospective, cohort study. Methods Forty-four patients underwent BMR resection (BMR group) or UMR resection (UMR group) for recurrent constant exotropia of 25 prism diopters (PD) or less at distance after undergoing BLR muscle recession for intermittent exotropia in an institutional setting. The main outcome measures were final success rates and improvement in stereopsis and were compared between the groups. The risk factors for recurrence after reoperation also were evaluated. Secondary outcome measures were evaluated based on the drift of ocular alignment toward exodeviation after surgery (exodrift) from postoperative day 1. Results Thirteen (54%) of 24 patients in the BMR group had successful outcomes, 10 (42%) had overcorrection, and 1 (4%) had undercorrection at the last follow-up examination. Sixteen (80%) of 20 patients in the UMR group had successful outcomes, 2 (10%) had undercorrection, and 2 (10%) had overcorrection. The incidence of successful outcomes at the last follow-up examination and the incidence of recurrence were not significantly different between the 2 groups, whereas the incidence of overcorrection was significantly higher in the BMR group (P = .017). Conclusions Large UMR resection is a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of small to moderate angles of recurrent exotropia after BLR muscle recession. The overcorrection rate was significantly lower after UMR resection than it was after BMR resection. To compare outcomes after bilateral and unilateral medial rectus (BMR/UMR) resection for the treatment of recurrent exotropia after bilateral lateral rectus (BLR) muscle recession. Retrospective, cohort study. Forty-four patients underwent BMR resection (BMR group) or UMR resection (UMR group) for recurrent constant exotropia of 25 prism diopters (PD) or less at distance after undergoing BLR muscle recession for intermittent exotropia in an institutional setting. The main outcome measures were final success rates and improvement in stereopsis and were compared between the groups. The risk factors for recurrence after reoperation also were evaluated. Secondary outcome measures were evaluated based on the drift of ocular alignment toward exodeviation after surgery (exodrift) from postoperative day 1. Thirteen (54%) of 24 patients in the BMR group had successful outcomes, 10 (42%) had overcorrection, and 1 (4%) had undercorrection at the last follow-up examination. Sixteen (80%) of 20 patients in the UMR group had successful outcomes, 2 (10%) had undercorrection, and 2 (10%) had overcorrection. The incidence of successful outcomes at the last follow-up examination and the incidence of recurrence were not significantly different between the 2 groups, whereas the incidence of overcorrection was significantly higher in the BMR group (P = .017). Large UMR resection is a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of small to moderate angles of recurrent exotropia after BLR muscle recession. The overcorrection rate was significantly lower after UMR resection than it was after BMR resection." @default.
• W1982362377 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1982362377 creator A5024438097 @default.
• W1982362377 creator A5056942694 @default.
• W1982362377 date "2009-09-01" @default.
• W1982362377 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W1982362377 title "Bilateral vs Unilateral Medial Rectus Resection for Recurrent Exotropia after Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession" @default.
• W1982362377 cites W1535283966 @default.
• W1982362377 cites W1964791842 @default.
• W1982362377 cites W1971116593 @default.
• W1982362377 cites W1979096889 @default.
• W1982362377 cites W1986359205 @default.
• W1982362377 cites W1986381034 @default.
• W1982362377 cites W2007583524 @default.
• W1982362377 cites W2013627685 @default.
• W1982362377 cites W2016500330 @default.
• W1982362377 cites W2023744948 @default.
• W1982362377 cites W2057048111 @default.
• W1982362377 cites W2081800150 @default.
• W1982362377 cites W2090014527 @default.
• W1982362377 cites W2090265324 @default.
• W1982362377 cites W2134956049 @default.
• W1982362377 cites W2284327060 @default.
• W1982362377 cites W4292510013 @default.
• W1982362377 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2009.04.017" @default.
• W1982362377 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19541284" @default.
• W1982362377 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W1982362377 type Work @default.
• W1982362377 sameAs 1982362377 @default.
• W1982362377 citedByCount "31" @default.
• W1982362377 countsByYear W19823623772012 @default.
• W1982362377 countsByYear W19823623772014 @default.
• W1982362377 countsByYear W19823623772015 @default.
• W1982362377 countsByYear W19823623772016 @default.
• W1982362377 countsByYear W19823623772017 @default.
• W1982362377 countsByYear W19823623772018 @default.
• W1982362377 countsByYear W19823623772019 @default.
• W1982362377 countsByYear W19823623772022 @default.
• W1982362377 countsByYear W19823623772023 @default.
• W1982362377 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1982362377 hasAuthorship W1982362377A5024438097 @default.
• W1982362377 hasAuthorship W1982362377A5056942694 @default.
• W1982362377 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W1982362377 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W1982362377 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1982362377 hasConcept C159110652 @default.
• W1982362377 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W1982362377 hasConcept C2776864138 @default.
• W1982362377 hasConcept C2778207058 @default.
• W1982362377 hasConcept C2779029879 @default.
• W1982362377 hasConcept C2908550172 @default.
• W1982362377 hasConcept C61511704 @default.
• W1982362377 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1982362377 hasConceptScore W1982362377C120665830 @default.
• W1982362377 hasConceptScore W1982362377C121332964 @default.
• W1982362377 hasConceptScore W1982362377C141071460 @default.
• W1982362377 hasConceptScore W1982362377C159110652 @default.
• W1982362377 hasConceptScore W1982362377C167135981 @default.
• W1982362377 hasConceptScore W1982362377C2776864138 @default.
• W1982362377 hasConceptScore W1982362377C2778207058 @default.
• W1982362377 hasConceptScore W1982362377C2779029879 @default.
• W1982362377 hasConceptScore W1982362377C2908550172 @default.
• W1982362377 hasConceptScore W1982362377C61511704 @default.
• W1982362377 hasConceptScore W1982362377C71924100 @default.
• W1982362377 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W1982362377 hasLocation W19823623771 @default.
• W1982362377 hasLocation W19823623772 @default.
• W1982362377 hasOpenAccess W1982362377 @default.
• W1982362377 hasPrimaryLocation W19823623771 @default.
• W1982362377 hasRelatedWork W1894395702 @default.
• W1982362377 hasRelatedWork W2065843393 @default.
• W1982362377 hasRelatedWork W2134956049 @default.
• W1982362377 hasRelatedWork W2317501976 @default.
• W1982362377 hasRelatedWork W2324215036 @default.
• W1982362377 hasRelatedWork W2364253684 @default.
• W1982362377 hasRelatedWork W2397451555 @default.
• W1982362377 hasRelatedWork W3029063983 @default.
• W1982362377 hasRelatedWork W3029363264 @default.
• W1982362377 hasRelatedWork W3037100944 @default.
• W1982362377 hasVolume "148" @default.
• W1982362377 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1982362377 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1982362377 magId "1982362377" @default.
• W1982362377 workType "article" @default.