FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W198245147> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W198245147 startingPage "60" @default.
• W198245147 abstract "Most banks will be faced at some point with the need to investigate suspected employee wrongdoing, whether in regard to money laundering, garden variety theft, or sexual harassment. Investigating employee misconduct is complex, requiring both good judgment and an understanding of the legal framework in which the investigation is conducted. At the very least, a mishandled investigation may result in failure to cure a problem before it develops into a major headache; at worst, it may expose the bank to a raft of legal claims. There is no single right way to conduct an employee investigation. Each case will present different challenges and will require sensitive handling. However, your bank can improve its legal position and the likelihood of a successful investigation by having appropriate policies in place from the outset; by careful selection of the investigative personnel, investigation targets and techniques; and by thoughtful handling of the information uncovered during the investigation. Who should conduct the investigation? Perhaps the first issue for any bank contemplating an internal investigation is selection of the investigator. There are several possibilities: internal legal or human resources staff, outside counsel, or an outside consultant. Whoever is selected to conduct the investigation must be well versed in the general legal issues surrounding the investigation, and must be familiar with any relevant policies of the bank. Equally important, the investigator must be a credible potential witness for the bank in the event of subsequent litigation. In considering whether to turn to in-house resources or to look outside, the bank should be aware of the impact of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act on investigations. Until a very recent amendment to FCRA, the Federal Trade Commission had taken the position that of investigations into employee misconduct by third-party experts were consumer reports subject to the FCRA's notice, consent, and disclosure requirements. The FTC's position was troublesome, hampering the employer's ability to conduct an investigation using expert resources at a time when employers are under increasing pressure to police their workplaces. In December 2003, Congress yielded to pressure from the employer community and amended FCRA to clarify that certain investigations of employee wrongdoing fall outside the act's requirements. While the amendments significantly improve a bank's ability to use third-party investigators, there are still a number of legal hoops the bank must jump through in order to avail itself of the new exclusion. First, the investigation must concern: * suspected misconduct related to employment; * compliance with federal, state or local laws or regulations, or the rules of a self-regulatory organization; or * compliance with any preexisting written policies of the employer. Second, the employer will lose the benefit of the exclusion if the investigative report is shared with anyone other than the employer, a government officer or agency, a self-regulatory organization with regulatory authority over the activities of the employer or employee, or as otherwise required by law. Third, after taking any adverse action against an employee based in whole or in part upon the investigative report, the employer must give the employee a summary of the nature and substance of the report. The employer need not, however, identify the individuals who provided information in the report. Who should be investigated? Like any other employment action, the decision to investigate must be made for legitimate business reasons. While in most instances the bank will have an objective reason to select an employee for investigation, such as a complaint by a coworker, the bank must be careful that it does not appear to be singling out the employee for a legally impermissible reason. …" @default.
• W198245147 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W198245147 creator A5012684909 @default.
• W198245147 date "2004-03-01" @default.
• W198245147 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W198245147 title "Careful How You Investigate: Forget What You've Seen in the Movies. Eavesdropping Doesn't Belong in Employee Investigations. Even E-Mail Investigation Can Be Dicey" @default.
• W198245147 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W198245147 type Work @default.
• W198245147 sameAs 198245147 @default.
• W198245147 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W198245147 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W198245147 hasAuthorship W198245147A5012684909 @default.
• W198245147 hasConcept C108827166 @default.
• W198245147 hasConcept C136197465 @default.
• W198245147 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W198245147 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W198245147 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W198245147 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W198245147 hasConcept C2776900844 @default.
• W198245147 hasConcept C2777930997 @default.
• W198245147 hasConcept C2778585151 @default.
• W198245147 hasConcept C2778976716 @default.
• W198245147 hasConcept C2780587575 @default.
• W198245147 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W198245147 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W198245147 hasConceptScore W198245147C108827166 @default.
• W198245147 hasConceptScore W198245147C136197465 @default.
• W198245147 hasConceptScore W198245147C144133560 @default.
• W198245147 hasConceptScore W198245147C154945302 @default.
• W198245147 hasConceptScore W198245147C17744445 @default.
• W198245147 hasConceptScore W198245147C199539241 @default.
• W198245147 hasConceptScore W198245147C2776900844 @default.
• W198245147 hasConceptScore W198245147C2777930997 @default.
• W198245147 hasConceptScore W198245147C2778585151 @default.
• W198245147 hasConceptScore W198245147C2778976716 @default.
• W198245147 hasConceptScore W198245147C2780587575 @default.
• W198245147 hasConceptScore W198245147C39549134 @default.
• W198245147 hasConceptScore W198245147C41008148 @default.
• W198245147 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W198245147 hasLocation W1982451471 @default.
• W198245147 hasOpenAccess W198245147 @default.
• W198245147 hasPrimaryLocation W1982451471 @default.
• W198245147 hasRelatedWork W111588792 @default.
• W198245147 hasRelatedWork W114600230 @default.
• W198245147 hasRelatedWork W1667327955 @default.
• W198245147 hasRelatedWork W184549597 @default.
• W198245147 hasRelatedWork W2053717233 @default.
• W198245147 hasRelatedWork W2064679704 @default.
• W198245147 hasRelatedWork W2077184724 @default.
• W198245147 hasRelatedWork W2178705881 @default.
• W198245147 hasRelatedWork W2187847198 @default.
• W198245147 hasRelatedWork W251603629 @default.
• W198245147 hasRelatedWork W259004213 @default.
• W198245147 hasRelatedWork W2611130808 @default.
• W198245147 hasRelatedWork W279313544 @default.
• W198245147 hasRelatedWork W280034869 @default.
• W198245147 hasRelatedWork W29102542 @default.
• W198245147 hasRelatedWork W308577351 @default.
• W198245147 hasRelatedWork W3164626280 @default.
• W198245147 hasRelatedWork W364361808 @default.
• W198245147 hasRelatedWork W890430879 @default.
• W198245147 hasRelatedWork W2342184471 @default.
• W198245147 hasVolume "96" @default.
• W198245147 isParatext "false" @default.
• W198245147 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W198245147 magId "198245147" @default.
• W198245147 workType "article" @default.