FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1982487599> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1982487599 endingPage "1160" @default.
• W1982487599 startingPage "1151" @default.
• W1982487599 abstract "Forest management approaches are increasingly being focused on restoring or retaining structurally complex old forest conditions. Evaluations of the long-term impacts of different management regimes on the maintenance and restoration of these conditions are critical for informing and refining current management approaches. To this end, we examined the long-term effects of differing intensities of single-tree selection harvest on stand structural attributes within northern hardwood forests in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, USA. Stands in this study were classified as old growth at the onset of the experiment and were repeatedly treated and maintained at three residual stocking levels (11.5, 16.1, and 20.7 m2 ha−1 in trees greater than 24 cm DBH) with three different cutting cycle lengths (5, 10, and 15 years) over a 57-year period. Conditions within an adjacent, unmanaged old-growth system were used as a benchmark for comparing stand structural attributes, including abundance of downed woody debris (DWD), regeneration, and large diameter trees. Stand stocking level was the primary factor affecting the long-term trends in stand structure and composition observed among stands. In particular, stands maintained at a 11.5 m2 ha−1 stocking level had significantly lower amounts of DWD, snags, and large overstory trees compared to the 20.7 m2 ha−1 stocking level. Similarly, the highest stocking level treatment had the greatest abundance of Betula alleghaniensis relative to the other two stocking level treatments. In addition, long-term trends in diameter distribution forms indicated that the two highest stocking level treatments largely displayed increasing q and negative exponential curve forms over time, whereas the 11.5 m2 ha−1 stocking level was primarily characterized by concave distribution forms. Ordination analyses of stand structural attributes indicated that stands managed with the highest residual stocking levels contained stand structural characteristics approximating those found within the unmanaged, old-growth benchmark stand, whereas the lowest stocking level was much less complex. These results suggest that single-tree selection systems that maintain high stand residual basal areas, a portion of which is made up of large diameter, below-grade, defective trees, could serve as a potential means to integrate or retain old-growth forest elements in managed stands." @default.
• W1982487599 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1982487599 creator A5058304577 @default.
• W1982487599 creator A5080732138 @default.
• W1982487599 creator A5086204095 @default.
• W1982487599 date "2010-03-01" @default.
• W1982487599 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1982487599 title "The influence of cutting cycle and stocking level on the structure and composition of managed old-growth northern hardwoods" @default.
• W1982487599 cites W1513057253 @default.
• W1982487599 cites W1565509910 @default.
• W1982487599 cites W1970710518 @default.
• W1982487599 cites W1978183643 @default.
• W1982487599 cites W1982757024 @default.
• W1982487599 cites W1991813328 @default.
• W1982487599 cites W1997932044 @default.
• W1982487599 cites W2019701914 @default.
• W1982487599 cites W2032491933 @default.
• W1982487599 cites W2058602547 @default.
• W1982487599 cites W2074981464 @default.
• W1982487599 cites W2089115806 @default.
• W1982487599 cites W2091688953 @default.
• W1982487599 cites W2100186110 @default.
• W1982487599 cites W2104200566 @default.
• W1982487599 cites W2105802196 @default.
• W1982487599 cites W2114181376 @default.
• W1982487599 cites W2154396680 @default.
• W1982487599 cites W2155949969 @default.
• W1982487599 cites W2156917518 @default.
• W1982487599 cites W2160419165 @default.
• W1982487599 cites W2160608329 @default.
• W1982487599 cites W2176322772 @default.
• W1982487599 cites W2328866528 @default.
• W1982487599 cites W2470971115 @default.
• W1982487599 cites W2969613840 @default.
• W1982487599 cites W3032962108 @default.
• W1982487599 cites W563141231 @default.
• W1982487599 cites W612592408 @default.
• W1982487599 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.01.001" @default.
• W1982487599 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W1982487599 type Work @default.
• W1982487599 sameAs 1982487599 @default.
• W1982487599 citedByCount "50" @default.
• W1982487599 countsByYear W19824875992012 @default.
• W1982487599 countsByYear W19824875992013 @default.
• W1982487599 countsByYear W19824875992014 @default.
• W1982487599 countsByYear W19824875992015 @default.
• W1982487599 countsByYear W19824875992016 @default.
• W1982487599 countsByYear W19824875992017 @default.
• W1982487599 countsByYear W19824875992018 @default.
• W1982487599 countsByYear W19824875992019 @default.
• W1982487599 countsByYear W19824875992020 @default.
• W1982487599 countsByYear W19824875992021 @default.
• W1982487599 countsByYear W19824875992022 @default.
• W1982487599 countsByYear W19824875992023 @default.
• W1982487599 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1982487599 hasAuthorship W1982487599A5058304577 @default.
• W1982487599 hasAuthorship W1982487599A5080732138 @default.
• W1982487599 hasAuthorship W1982487599A5086204095 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConcept C121560416 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConcept C153279818 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConcept C185933670 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConcept C192158950 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConcept C2775882201 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConcept C2775966360 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConcept C2780674770 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConcept C28631016 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConcept C2909496354 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConcept C54286561 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConcept C77077793 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConcept C83873828 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConcept C97137747 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConceptScore W1982487599C121560416 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConceptScore W1982487599C153279818 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConceptScore W1982487599C185933670 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConceptScore W1982487599C18903297 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConceptScore W1982487599C192158950 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConceptScore W1982487599C205649164 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConceptScore W1982487599C2775882201 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConceptScore W1982487599C2775966360 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConceptScore W1982487599C2780674770 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConceptScore W1982487599C28631016 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConceptScore W1982487599C2909496354 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConceptScore W1982487599C39432304 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConceptScore W1982487599C54286561 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConceptScore W1982487599C77077793 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConceptScore W1982487599C83873828 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConceptScore W1982487599C86803240 @default.
• W1982487599 hasConceptScore W1982487599C97137747 @default.
• W1982487599 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W1982487599 hasLocation W19824875991 @default.
• W1982487599 hasOpenAccess W1982487599 @default.
• W1982487599 hasPrimaryLocation W19824875991 @default.
• W1982487599 hasRelatedWork W1982487599 @default.
• W1982487599 hasRelatedWork W2104200566 @default.

• next