FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1983129631> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1983129631 abstract "AbstractDetermining the learning quality and the role of measurement and evaluation are accepted as part of the duties and responsibilities of teachers and operators in structured teaching programs. This qualitative case study research examined teacher candidates' conceptual understanding of the reasons for measurement and evaluation and for determining of the learning change to ascertain if trained teacher candidates met the required expectations. The study participants were determined using criteria sampling and consisted of 101 science teacher candidates. The data was collected using open ended questions, which were analyzed using content analysis. The research found that the teacher candidates' conceptual understanding as to the reasons for evaluation and determining the learning change were inadequate. It was found that the participants were unable to relate the measurement and evaluation purposes with learning change, arid that the understanding of the measurement and evaluation concepts aimed at determining the need for learning change did not coincide. The data suggested that there could be teacher training insufficiencies arid that the duties and responsi bititles of the new teaching programs encumbered the teachers. In this context, it was suggested that determ ini ng the learning changes by measurement and evaluation practices be emphasized during teacher training.KeywordsDetermining the Learning Change, Teacher Candidates, Measurement, Evaluation, Conceptual Understanding.Over the last five years the teaching programs in our country, which had been developed within the frame of the European Union adaptation standards, have been restructured with regard to learning areas and approaches. Newer teaching programs, therefore, have improved natures/structures (Kurnaz & Cepni, 2012; Milli Egitim Bakanligi [MEB], 2007; Ustun, Eryilmaz, & Gulyurdu, 2008). Therefore, teachers and the operators of teaching programs have new important responsibilities with regards to the areas of learning and approaches to the program (Ates et al., 2009; Gunes & Tasar, 2006; Serin & Kanli, 2008). This implies that teachers are expected to assimilate these renewed learning areas and approaches into their teaching, such as the constructivist learning approach which requires that learners take responsibility for their own learning progress while the teachers act as facilitators or guides (Cobern, 1993; Karamustafaoglu, Costu, & Ayas, 2005; Kurnaz & Calik, 2008, 2009; Mathews, 2000; Osborne & Wittrock, 1983).For science and technology teaching programs, teachers are required to carry out diagnostic, formative, and summative measurement and evaluation (Kumaz & Cepni, 2012). Therefore, there needs to be a change in the way teachers perceive the measurement and evaluation process in parallel with the new teaching programs, a process which is clearly stated in the teaching programs (see also MEB, 2006, 2013). The key features of the diagnostic, formative, and summative assessments are shown in Table 1.As shown in Figure 1, a teacher needs to first conduct a diagnostic assessment to determine a student's present knowledge. From the data obtained, a formative assessment is conducted to enable a deepening of the learning. Finally, a summative assessment is conducted to determine the student's acquisition, recognize the learning change, and identify learning gaps. What is new here is the need for the diagnostic assessment at the start of the learning process and determining the learning changes. As stated above, the diagnostic assessment is related to understanding the extent of a student's prior knowledge.According to Hailikari (2009), prior knowledge is used for (I) determining the student's level, (II) determining the class aims, and (III) designing the student learning environment. In recent research, it has been observed that students' prior knowledge level should be considered for determining learning change (Hake, 2002a, 2002b; Ladd & Walsh, 2012; Meltzer, 2002; Thompson, 2008; Zeilik, 2012). …" @default.
• W1983129631 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1983129631 creator A5050780166 @default.
• W1983129631 date "2014-10-02" @default.
• W1983129631 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1983129631 title "Conceptual Understanding of Science Teacher Candidates regarding the Reason for Measurement and Evaluation and for Determining Learning Change" @default.
• W1983129631 cites W1519518981 @default.
• W1983129631 cites W1527311855 @default.
• W1983129631 cites W1636952419 @default.
• W1983129631 cites W1976219873 @default.
• W1983129631 cites W1987597583 @default.
• W1983129631 cites W2008785686 @default.
• W1983129631 cites W2049428829 @default.
• W1983129631 cites W2058743526 @default.
• W1983129631 cites W2064971288 @default.
• W1983129631 cites W2088124607 @default.
• W1983129631 cites W2101562389 @default.
• W1983129631 cites W2110565097 @default.
• W1983129631 cites W2111940683 @default.
• W1983129631 cites W2131442425 @default.
• W1983129631 cites W2317259554 @default.
• W1983129631 cites W2606548595 @default.
• W1983129631 cites W2616445183 @default.
• W1983129631 cites W2910349599 @default.
• W1983129631 cites W2995849063 @default.
• W1983129631 cites W3015856504 @default.
• W1983129631 doi "https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.5.1671" @default.
• W1983129631 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W1983129631 type Work @default.
• W1983129631 sameAs 1983129631 @default.
• W1983129631 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W1983129631 countsByYear W19831296312021 @default.
• W1983129631 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1983129631 hasAuthorship W1983129631A5050780166 @default.
• W1983129631 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W1983129631 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W1983129631 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1983129631 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
• W1983129631 hasConcept C2781329482 @default.
• W1983129631 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1983129631 hasConcept C539667460 @default.
• W1983129631 hasConcept C55587333 @default.
• W1983129631 hasConceptScore W1983129631C127413603 @default.
• W1983129631 hasConceptScore W1983129631C145420912 @default.
• W1983129631 hasConceptScore W1983129631C15744967 @default.
• W1983129631 hasConceptScore W1983129631C2522767166 @default.
• W1983129631 hasConceptScore W1983129631C2781329482 @default.
• W1983129631 hasConceptScore W1983129631C41008148 @default.
• W1983129631 hasConceptScore W1983129631C539667460 @default.
• W1983129631 hasConceptScore W1983129631C55587333 @default.
• W1983129631 hasLocation W19831296311 @default.
• W1983129631 hasOpenAccess W1983129631 @default.
• W1983129631 hasPrimaryLocation W19831296311 @default.
• W1983129631 hasRelatedWork W1986395542 @default.
• W1983129631 hasRelatedWork W1991212537 @default.
• W1983129631 hasRelatedWork W1996408511 @default.
• W1983129631 hasRelatedWork W2324104188 @default.
• W1983129631 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W1983129631 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W1983129631 hasRelatedWork W4207066567 @default.
• W1983129631 hasRelatedWork W4247880953 @default.
• W1983129631 hasRelatedWork W4312974985 @default.
• W1983129631 hasRelatedWork W814118814 @default.
• W1983129631 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1983129631 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1983129631 magId "1983129631" @default.
• W1983129631 workType "article" @default.