FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1983221743> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1983221743 endingPage "179" @default.
• W1983221743 startingPage "162" @default.
• W1983221743 abstract "A firm's technological knowledge base is the foundation on which internal product and process innovations are generated. However, technological knowledge is not accumulated solely through internal learning processes. Increasingly, firms are turning to external sources in the technology supply chain to acquire the technological knowledge they need to introduce product and process innovations. Thus, the successful structuring and executing of partnerships with external “technology source” organizations is often critical to competitive success in technologically dynamic environments. This study uses situated learning theory as a basis for explaining how factors inherent to the knowledge acquisition context may affect the successful transference of technological knowledge from universities to their industry partners. Data collected via a survey instrument from 104 industry managers were used to explore the effects of various organizational knowledge interface factors on knowledge acquisition success in university–industry alliances. The organizational knowledge interface factors hypothesized to affect knowledge acquisition success in the current research include partner trust, partner familiarity, technology familiarity, alliance experience, formal collaboration teams, and technology experts' communications. Results indicate that partner trust predicts the successful acquisition of tacit knowledge but not explicit knowledge. Both forms of knowledge are predicted by partner familiarity and communications between the partners' technology experts. These findings suggest three principal managerial implications. First, although the development of a trusting relationship between the knowledge source and knowledge-seeking parties is generally advisable, firms that seek to acquire explicit technological knowledge from their alliance partners may successfully do so without having made significant time and energy investments designed to assure themselves that they can trust those partners. The relative observability and verifiability of explicit knowledge relative to tacit knowledge may enable knowledge-seeking parties to have greater confidence that knowledge has been acquired when partner trust is in question or has not been deliberately developed. A second implication is that, other things being equal, a knowledge-seeking party's interests may be best served through repeated exposures to particular alliance partners, particularly if those exposures facilitate mutual understandings on relevant process-related matters. A third managerial implication is that ongoing, broad-based communications between the partners' technology experts should be used to effect technology transfer. A key quality of the organizational knowledge interface that promotes the successful acquisition of technological knowledge, both tacit and explicit, is multipoint, real-time contact between the technology experts of the partner organizations. Such communications potentially enable the knowledge-seeking party to directly access desired information through the most knowledgeable individuals on an as-needed basis." @default.
• W1983221743 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1983221743 creator A5040072361 @default.
• W1983221743 creator A5077783950 @default.
• W1983221743 date "2008-03-01" @default.
• W1983221743 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W1983221743 title "Knowledge Acquisition in University–Industry Alliances: An Empirical Investigation from a Learning Theory Perspective" @default.
• W1983221743 cites W1497947628 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W1518732113 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W1523783982 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W1966565904 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W1966816881 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W1968725802 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W1971633378 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W1979422830 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W1992988808 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W1994632152 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W2019712834 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W2022456095 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W2023006187 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W2026844816 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W2030799799 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W2037557484 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W2047159741 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W2047729773 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W2056174788 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W2057335196 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W2083321560 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W2093499537 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W2099137380 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W2106919063 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W2108238076 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W2108752510 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W2108795964 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W2114706684 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W2116808919 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W2119652992 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W2121981962 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W2129143360 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W2130660952 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W2132454116 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W2150238850 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W2150587481 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W2172157658 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W3089001878 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W3123416398 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W3124852901 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W3125329768 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W3125571233 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W3215763693 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W4229996701 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W4230663525 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W4231207040 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W4238790888 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W4239178117 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W4243443864 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W4245961435 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W4246477977 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W4246622376 @default.
• W1983221743 cites W4251201432 @default.
• W1983221743 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00292.x" @default.
• W1983221743 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W1983221743 type Work @default.
• W1983221743 sameAs 1983221743 @default.
• W1983221743 citedByCount "167" @default.
• W1983221743 countsByYear W19832217432012 @default.
• W1983221743 countsByYear W19832217432013 @default.
• W1983221743 countsByYear W19832217432014 @default.
• W1983221743 countsByYear W19832217432015 @default.
• W1983221743 countsByYear W19832217432016 @default.
• W1983221743 countsByYear W19832217432017 @default.
• W1983221743 countsByYear W19832217432018 @default.
• W1983221743 countsByYear W19832217432019 @default.
• W1983221743 countsByYear W19832217432020 @default.
• W1983221743 countsByYear W19832217432021 @default.
• W1983221743 countsByYear W19832217432022 @default.
• W1983221743 countsByYear W19832217432023 @default.
• W1983221743 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1983221743 hasAuthorship W1983221743A5040072361 @default.
• W1983221743 hasAuthorship W1983221743A5077783950 @default.
• W1983221743 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W1983221743 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W1983221743 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W1983221743 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1983221743 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W1983221743 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W1983221743 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W1983221743 hasConcept C166052673 @default.
• W1983221743 hasConcept C169735623 @default.
• W1983221743 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1983221743 hasConcept C191628500 @default.
• W1983221743 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1983221743 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W1983221743 hasConcept C2777220311 @default.
• W1983221743 hasConcept C2778431023 @default.
• W1983221743 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W1983221743 hasConcept C2779561248 @default.
• W1983221743 hasConcept C33923547 @default.

• next