FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1983919662> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1983919662 abstract "Deference - the substitution by a decision maker of someone else's judgment for its own - is a pervasive tool of constitutional doctrine. But although it has been studied at more abstract levels of jurisprudence and at very specific doctrinal levels, it has received surprisingly little general attention in constitutional scholarship. This Article aims to fill that gap. This Article makes three primary contributions to the literature. First, it provides a careful examination of deference as a doctrinal tool in constitutional law, and offers a taxonomy of deference. In particular, it suggests that deference can best be understood as relying on two separate but overlapping grounds: deference on the basis of the legal authority of the deferee, and deference on the basis of the deferee's epistemic, or knowledge-based, authority. Importantly, this Article suggests that deference cannot be examined from the standpoint of the deferring institution - usually, the courts - alone. Rather, we must also consider the obligations of deferees, which should invoke deference only for those decisions reached in the full and fair exercise of their legal or epistemic authority. Second, the Article demonstrates the practical benefits of this richer understanding of deference by applying it to a recent case in which the Supreme Court confronted competing claims of deference: Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights (FAIR), in which the Supreme Court rejected a challenge to the Solomon Amendment, which requires law schools to provide access to campus for military recruiters. In FAIR, the Court faced claims of deference from Congress, acting pursuant to its military powers, and from the law schools, which invoked deference both as expressive associations and as universities. The Court's treatment of these competing claims to deference was unsatisfactory. The Court gave too much deference to Congress, and too little to the law schools. In particular, it failed to accord them the deference they deserved as universities, which serve as vital Amendment in the universe of public discourse. The Court's failure to soundly address these competing claims of deference bespeaks a larger failure to theorize the nature of deference and the occasions on which courts should defer. Thus underequipped, the Court was left at sea when confronting multiple institutions competing for deference in the same case. At the same time, the law schools themselves may have fallen short in meeting their own obligations as deferees. Finally, the Article shows that its examination of deference, and of universities as First Amendment institutions, lies at the intersection of two developing areas of constitutional scholarship: the study of constitutional decision rules, and the study of institutionally oriented approaches to the First Amendment. It argues that these two emerging fields are linked by the concept of deference, and might learn a good deal from each other." @default.
• W1983919662 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1983919662 creator A5011126731 @default.
• W1983919662 date "2007-10-03" @default.
• W1983919662 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1983919662 title "Three Faces of Deference" @default.
• W1983919662 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W1983919662 type Work @default.
• W1983919662 sameAs 1983919662 @default.
• W1983919662 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W1983919662 countsByYear W19839196622012 @default.
• W1983919662 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W1983919662 hasAuthorship W1983919662A5011126731 @default.
• W1983919662 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1983919662 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1983919662 hasConcept C18650270 @default.
• W1983919662 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W1983919662 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1983919662 hasConcept C2776211767 @default.
• W1983919662 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W1983919662 hasConcept C2780114137 @default.
• W1983919662 hasConcept C2780597233 @default.
• W1983919662 hasConcept C2781442640 @default.
• W1983919662 hasConcept C71043370 @default.
• W1983919662 hasConceptScore W1983919662C144024400 @default.
• W1983919662 hasConceptScore W1983919662C17744445 @default.
• W1983919662 hasConceptScore W1983919662C18650270 @default.
• W1983919662 hasConceptScore W1983919662C190253527 @default.
• W1983919662 hasConceptScore W1983919662C199539241 @default.
• W1983919662 hasConceptScore W1983919662C2776211767 @default.
• W1983919662 hasConceptScore W1983919662C2778272461 @default.
• W1983919662 hasConceptScore W1983919662C2780114137 @default.
• W1983919662 hasConceptScore W1983919662C2780597233 @default.
• W1983919662 hasConceptScore W1983919662C2781442640 @default.
• W1983919662 hasConceptScore W1983919662C71043370 @default.
• W1983919662 hasLocation W19839196621 @default.
• W1983919662 hasOpenAccess W1983919662 @default.
• W1983919662 hasPrimaryLocation W19839196621 @default.
• W1983919662 hasRelatedWork W1530978479 @default.
• W1983919662 hasRelatedWork W1550099827 @default.
• W1983919662 hasRelatedWork W1682681932 @default.
• W1983919662 hasRelatedWork W2112322014 @default.
• W1983919662 hasRelatedWork W2740132209 @default.
• W1983919662 hasRelatedWork W2771503461 @default.
• W1983919662 hasRelatedWork W278407623 @default.
• W1983919662 hasRelatedWork W2811110520 @default.
• W1983919662 hasRelatedWork W2900318710 @default.
• W1983919662 hasRelatedWork W291692983 @default.
• W1983919662 hasRelatedWork W3121180543 @default.
• W1983919662 hasRelatedWork W3122783545 @default.
• W1983919662 hasRelatedWork W3124515598 @default.
• W1983919662 hasRelatedWork W3125632222 @default.
• W1983919662 hasRelatedWork W3139092529 @default.
• W1983919662 hasRelatedWork W3159589399 @default.
• W1983919662 hasRelatedWork W3166694633 @default.
• W1983919662 hasRelatedWork W3203636156 @default.
• W1983919662 hasRelatedWork W3205072051 @default.
• W1983919662 hasRelatedWork W3126989044 @default.
• W1983919662 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1983919662 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1983919662 magId "1983919662" @default.
• W1983919662 workType "article" @default.