FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1984211204> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1984211204 endingPage "92" @default.
• W1984211204 startingPage "85" @default.
• W1984211204 abstract "Purpose Complaints can provide the health provider with vital information on its performance and can point towards areas for improvement. The purpose of this study was to undertake a retrospective study of all formal complaints in an eye hospital over a three‐year period in order to look at the complaint rate, demographics, their nature, how they were resolved and the lessons learned. Design/methodology/approach Complaints received were entered onto the complaints module of the DATIX database system. Formal patient complaints between April 2003 and March 2006 available on the DATIX database were analysed retrospectively. Findings The study found that there were total of 94 formal complaints out of 186,323 attendances at the hospital. The overall complaint rate was 5.09 per 10,000 attendances. 52(55.31 per cent) complaints were about rescheduling or cancellation of appointments. Complaints related to communication failure were 17(18.08 per cent) followed by clinical complaints, which totalled 13 (13.82 per cent). Four (4.25 per cent) complaints each under the category of amenities, administrative and waiting times were also recorded. The complaint rate for Outpatients Department was 1.5 per 10,000 attendances. The in‐patient ward had a complaint rate of 0.91 per 1000. The complaint rate for A&E department was 0.88 per 10,000 attendances. The operation theatre plus laser sessions had a complaint rate of 0.95 per 10,000. 79 (84.04 per cent) complaints were resolved at the first stage of local resolution. Complaints during the study period brought about two clinical changes in practice. Originality/value The use of complaints data as an important tool to learn from less satisfied patients is recommended. Comparing and sharing data on complaints between hospitals can help to highlight common deficient areas and can also be used to plan strategies." @default.
• W1984211204 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1984211204 creator A5004193520 @default.
• W1984211204 creator A5033263498 @default.
• W1984211204 creator A5087085552 @default.
• W1984211204 date "2007-05-01" @default.
• W1984211204 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W1984211204 title "Formal complaints at an eye hospital: a three‐year analysis" @default.
• W1984211204 cites W1492439834 @default.
• W1984211204 cites W1981342391 @default.
• W1984211204 cites W2052279270 @default.
• W1984211204 cites W2084510851 @default.
• W1984211204 cites W2105066687 @default.
• W1984211204 cites W2313936842 @default.
• W1984211204 cites W2409993084 @default.
• W1984211204 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/14777270710741447" @default.
• W1984211204 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W1984211204 type Work @default.
• W1984211204 sameAs 1984211204 @default.
• W1984211204 citedByCount "13" @default.
• W1984211204 countsByYear W19842112042012 @default.
• W1984211204 countsByYear W19842112042013 @default.
• W1984211204 countsByYear W19842112042014 @default.
• W1984211204 countsByYear W19842112042018 @default.
• W1984211204 countsByYear W19842112042020 @default.
• W1984211204 countsByYear W19842112042021 @default.
• W1984211204 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1984211204 hasAuthorship W1984211204A5004193520 @default.
• W1984211204 hasAuthorship W1984211204A5033263498 @default.
• W1984211204 hasAuthorship W1984211204A5087085552 @default.
• W1984211204 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1984211204 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W1984211204 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1984211204 hasConcept C187212893 @default.
• W1984211204 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W1984211204 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1984211204 hasConcept C2780084366 @default.
• W1984211204 hasConcept C2780838233 @default.
• W1984211204 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1984211204 hasConceptScore W1984211204C144024400 @default.
• W1984211204 hasConceptScore W1984211204C149923435 @default.
• W1984211204 hasConceptScore W1984211204C17744445 @default.
• W1984211204 hasConceptScore W1984211204C187212893 @default.
• W1984211204 hasConceptScore W1984211204C194828623 @default.
• W1984211204 hasConceptScore W1984211204C199539241 @default.
• W1984211204 hasConceptScore W1984211204C2780084366 @default.
• W1984211204 hasConceptScore W1984211204C2780838233 @default.
• W1984211204 hasConceptScore W1984211204C71924100 @default.
• W1984211204 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W1984211204 hasLocation W19842112041 @default.
• W1984211204 hasOpenAccess W1984211204 @default.
• W1984211204 hasPrimaryLocation W19842112041 @default.
• W1984211204 hasRelatedWork W2050306790 @default.
• W1984211204 hasRelatedWork W2106404923 @default.
• W1984211204 hasRelatedWork W2205478686 @default.
• W1984211204 hasRelatedWork W2418155463 @default.
• W1984211204 hasRelatedWork W2969519676 @default.
• W1984211204 hasRelatedWork W2982405164 @default.
• W1984211204 hasRelatedWork W3165402643 @default.
• W1984211204 hasRelatedWork W3191469462 @default.
• W1984211204 hasRelatedWork W3200670593 @default.
• W1984211204 hasRelatedWork W4311068385 @default.
• W1984211204 hasVolume "12" @default.
• W1984211204 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1984211204 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1984211204 magId "1984211204" @default.
• W1984211204 workType "article" @default.