FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1984314297> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1984314297 endingPage "339.e6" @default.
• W1984314297 startingPage "332" @default.
• W1984314297 abstract "Study objective We assessed the performance of 2 new devices (2D- and 3D-Mercy TAPE) to implement the Mercy Method for pediatric weight estimation and contrasted their accuracy with the Broselow method. Methods We enrolled children aged 2 months through 16 years in this prospective, multicenter, observational study. Height/length, weight, humeral length, and mid-upper arm circumference were obtained for each child, using calibrated scales and measures. We then made measurements with blinded versions of the 2D- and 3D-TAPEs. Using height/length data, we calculated the weight estimated by the Broselow method. We contrasted measures with mean error, mean percentage error, and percentage predicted within 10% and 20% of actual. Results Six hundred twenty-four participants (median 8.5 years, 27.6 kg, 17.3 kg/m2) completed the study. Mean error was 0.3 kg (mean percentage error 1.6%), 0.2 kg (mean percentage error 1.9%), and −1.3 kg (mean percentage error −4.1%) for 2D-, 3D-, and Broselow, respectively. Concordance between both TAPE devices and the Mercy Method was greater than 0.99. The proportion of children predicted within 10% and 20% of actual weight was 76% and 98% for the 2D-TAPE and 65% and 93% for the 3D-TAPE. Excluding the 209 (33%) children who were too tall for the device, Broselow predictions were within 10% and 20% of actual weight in 59% and 91%. Conclusion The 2D- and 3D-Mercy TAPEs outperform the Broselow tape for pediatric weight estimation and can be used in a wider range of children. We assessed the performance of 2 new devices (2D- and 3D-Mercy TAPE) to implement the Mercy Method for pediatric weight estimation and contrasted their accuracy with the Broselow method. We enrolled children aged 2 months through 16 years in this prospective, multicenter, observational study. Height/length, weight, humeral length, and mid-upper arm circumference were obtained for each child, using calibrated scales and measures. We then made measurements with blinded versions of the 2D- and 3D-TAPEs. Using height/length data, we calculated the weight estimated by the Broselow method. We contrasted measures with mean error, mean percentage error, and percentage predicted within 10% and 20% of actual. Six hundred twenty-four participants (median 8.5 years, 27.6 kg, 17.3 kg/m2) completed the study. Mean error was 0.3 kg (mean percentage error 1.6%), 0.2 kg (mean percentage error 1.9%), and −1.3 kg (mean percentage error −4.1%) for 2D-, 3D-, and Broselow, respectively. Concordance between both TAPE devices and the Mercy Method was greater than 0.99. The proportion of children predicted within 10% and 20% of actual weight was 76% and 98% for the 2D-TAPE and 65% and 93% for the 3D-TAPE. Excluding the 209 (33%) children who were too tall for the device, Broselow predictions were within 10% and 20% of actual weight in 59% and 91%. The 2D- and 3D-Mercy TAPEs outperform the Broselow tape for pediatric weight estimation and can be used in a wider range of children." @default.
• W1984314297 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1984314297 creator A5000952484 @default.
• W1984314297 creator A5046223351 @default.
• W1984314297 creator A5053797796 @default.
• W1984314297 creator A5078124610 @default.
• W1984314297 date "2013-10-01" @default.
• W1984314297 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W1984314297 title "Evaluation of the Mercy TAPE: Performance Against the Standard for Pediatric Weight Estimation" @default.
• W1984314297 cites W1979217520 @default.
• W1984314297 cites W1981201768 @default.
• W1984314297 cites W1986804141 @default.
• W1984314297 cites W1988366450 @default.
• W1984314297 cites W1988584958 @default.
• W1984314297 cites W2047134256 @default.
• W1984314297 cites W2114584570 @default.
• W1984314297 cites W2122628406 @default.
• W1984314297 cites W2154340155 @default.
• W1984314297 cites W2157523594 @default.
• W1984314297 cites W2158272114 @default.
• W1984314297 cites W2159941795 @default.
• W1984314297 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.02.021" @default.
• W1984314297 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4039210" @default.
• W1984314297 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23602655" @default.
• W1984314297 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W1984314297 type Work @default.
• W1984314297 sameAs 1984314297 @default.
• W1984314297 citedByCount "49" @default.
• W1984314297 countsByYear W19843142972013 @default.
• W1984314297 countsByYear W19843142972014 @default.
• W1984314297 countsByYear W19843142972015 @default.
• W1984314297 countsByYear W19843142972016 @default.
• W1984314297 countsByYear W19843142972017 @default.
• W1984314297 countsByYear W19843142972018 @default.
• W1984314297 countsByYear W19843142972019 @default.
• W1984314297 countsByYear W19843142972020 @default.
• W1984314297 countsByYear W19843142972021 @default.
• W1984314297 countsByYear W19843142972022 @default.
• W1984314297 countsByYear W19843142972023 @default.
• W1984314297 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1984314297 hasAuthorship W1984314297A5000952484 @default.
• W1984314297 hasAuthorship W1984314297A5046223351 @default.
• W1984314297 hasAuthorship W1984314297A5053797796 @default.
• W1984314297 hasAuthorship W1984314297A5078124610 @default.
• W1984314297 hasBestOaLocation W19843142972 @default.
• W1984314297 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W1984314297 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1984314297 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1984314297 hasConcept C160798450 @default.
• W1984314297 hasConcept C166504685 @default.
• W1984314297 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W1984314297 hasConcept C18747219 @default.
• W1984314297 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W1984314297 hasConcept C2992435398 @default.
• W1984314297 hasConcept C3019530228 @default.
• W1984314297 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1984314297 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1984314297 hasConceptScore W1984314297C105795698 @default.
• W1984314297 hasConceptScore W1984314297C126322002 @default.
• W1984314297 hasConceptScore W1984314297C141071460 @default.
• W1984314297 hasConceptScore W1984314297C160798450 @default.
• W1984314297 hasConceptScore W1984314297C166504685 @default.
• W1984314297 hasConceptScore W1984314297C168563851 @default.
• W1984314297 hasConceptScore W1984314297C18747219 @default.
• W1984314297 hasConceptScore W1984314297C2524010 @default.
• W1984314297 hasConceptScore W1984314297C2992435398 @default.
• W1984314297 hasConceptScore W1984314297C3019530228 @default.
• W1984314297 hasConceptScore W1984314297C33923547 @default.
• W1984314297 hasConceptScore W1984314297C71924100 @default.
• W1984314297 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W1984314297 hasLocation W19843142971 @default.
• W1984314297 hasLocation W19843142972 @default.
• W1984314297 hasLocation W19843142973 @default.
• W1984314297 hasLocation W19843142974 @default.
• W1984314297 hasOpenAccess W1984314297 @default.
• W1984314297 hasPrimaryLocation W19843142971 @default.
• W1984314297 hasRelatedWork W1983236426 @default.
• W1984314297 hasRelatedWork W2062693325 @default.
• W1984314297 hasRelatedWork W2126841246 @default.
• W1984314297 hasRelatedWork W2128657476 @default.
• W1984314297 hasRelatedWork W2413928159 @default.
• W1984314297 hasRelatedWork W2528104826 @default.
• W1984314297 hasRelatedWork W2528269731 @default.
• W1984314297 hasRelatedWork W2571483134 @default.
• W1984314297 hasRelatedWork W3138091450 @default.
• W1984314297 hasRelatedWork W3147808997 @default.
• W1984314297 hasVolume "62" @default.
• W1984314297 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1984314297 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1984314297 magId "1984314297" @default.
• W1984314297 workType "article" @default.