FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1985111908> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1985111908 abstract "Objectives Marked vascular tortuosity is more common in right radial approach (RRA) than that in left radial approach (LRA) and may lead to coronary procedure failure, especially in the elderly or female patients. However, the efficacy of LRA has not been adequately evaluated in older female patients. Therefore, we compared the feasibility and safety between LRA and RRA in older female patients undergoing coronary angiography. Methods Of 1060 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography, we identified 146 female patients age ≥70 years old. These patients were divided into LRA (n = 61) and RRA (n = 85)group. Coronary procedure success, coronary time defined as the time from radial sheath insertion to first cineangiography recording, time to diagnosis defined as the time from first cineangiography recording to the end of coronary angiography, total procedure time, fluoroscopy time, dose of radiation including cumulative air kerma (CAK) and CAK dose area product (CAKDAP), and contrast volume were compared between both groups. Results The baseline characteristics of the patients were similar between the two groups. Coronary procedural success was 56 of 61 (92%) for LRA and 80 of 85 (94%) for RRA. No significant differences were detected in coronary time (LRA195 ± 157 sec vs RRA 213 ± 193 sec, p = 0.58), total procedure time(LRA 15 ± 7min vs RRA 14 ± 6 min, p = 0.45), fluoroscopy time (LRA 4 ± 3 min vs RRA 4 ± 3 min, p = 0.96), CAK(LRA 309 ± 181mGy vs RRA 282 ± 169 mGy, p = 0.38) and CAK DAP (LRA; 28800 ± 16788mGycm 2 vs RRA 24900 ± 13855 mGycm 2 ,p = 0.15) between both groups. Nevertheless, contrast volume was significantly greater in LRA group than that in RRA group (65 ± 15 ml vs 60 ± 11 ml, p = 0.032). There was also a trend toward longer time to diagnosis in the LRA group (383 ± 220 sec vs 321 ± 151 sec, p = 0.054). Conclusions Although coronary procedural success rate is similar, LRA may be more time and contrast consume in older female patients undergoing coronary angiography compared to RRA." @default.
• W1985111908 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1985111908 creator A5008839625 @default.
• W1985111908 creator A5046866473 @default.
• W1985111908 creator A5076280974 @default.
• W1985111908 creator A5078723950 @default.
• W1985111908 creator A5086961793 @default.
• W1985111908 date "2013-08-01" @default.
• W1985111908 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W1985111908 title "GW24-e3530 Comparison of transradial (left versus right) coronary angiography in elderly women" @default.
• W1985111908 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304613.496" @default.
• W1985111908 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W1985111908 type Work @default.
• W1985111908 sameAs 1985111908 @default.
• W1985111908 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1985111908 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1985111908 hasAuthorship W1985111908A5008839625 @default.
• W1985111908 hasAuthorship W1985111908A5046866473 @default.
• W1985111908 hasAuthorship W1985111908A5076280974 @default.
• W1985111908 hasAuthorship W1985111908A5078723950 @default.
• W1985111908 hasAuthorship W1985111908A5086961793 @default.
• W1985111908 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1985111908 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W1985111908 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W1985111908 hasConcept C2776805002 @default.
• W1985111908 hasConcept C2780643987 @default.
• W1985111908 hasConcept C2908833630 @default.
• W1985111908 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W1985111908 hasConcept C3019004856 @default.
• W1985111908 hasConcept C500558357 @default.
• W1985111908 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1985111908 hasConcept C79905245 @default.
• W1985111908 hasConceptScore W1985111908C126322002 @default.
• W1985111908 hasConceptScore W1985111908C126838900 @default.
• W1985111908 hasConceptScore W1985111908C164705383 @default.
• W1985111908 hasConceptScore W1985111908C2776805002 @default.
• W1985111908 hasConceptScore W1985111908C2780643987 @default.
• W1985111908 hasConceptScore W1985111908C2908833630 @default.
• W1985111908 hasConceptScore W1985111908C2989005 @default.
• W1985111908 hasConceptScore W1985111908C3019004856 @default.
• W1985111908 hasConceptScore W1985111908C500558357 @default.
• W1985111908 hasConceptScore W1985111908C71924100 @default.
• W1985111908 hasConceptScore W1985111908C79905245 @default.
• W1985111908 hasLocation W19851119081 @default.
• W1985111908 hasOpenAccess W1985111908 @default.
• W1985111908 hasPrimaryLocation W19851119081 @default.
• W1985111908 hasRelatedWork W1823066725 @default.
• W1985111908 hasRelatedWork W197002235 @default.
• W1985111908 hasRelatedWork W1973941330 @default.
• W1985111908 hasRelatedWork W2012052414 @default.
• W1985111908 hasRelatedWork W2089911017 @default.
• W1985111908 hasRelatedWork W2114782775 @default.
• W1985111908 hasRelatedWork W2125425426 @default.
• W1985111908 hasRelatedWork W2136209709 @default.
• W1985111908 hasRelatedWork W2137103905 @default.
• W1985111908 hasRelatedWork W2158836206 @default.
• W1985111908 hasRelatedWork W2355664948 @default.
• W1985111908 hasRelatedWork W2359944959 @default.
• W1985111908 hasRelatedWork W2366700601 @default.
• W1985111908 hasRelatedWork W2366934794 @default.
• W1985111908 hasRelatedWork W2378221456 @default.
• W1985111908 hasRelatedWork W2379262593 @default.
• W1985111908 hasRelatedWork W2379346947 @default.
• W1985111908 hasRelatedWork W2385594055 @default.
• W1985111908 hasRelatedWork W2392216177 @default.
• W1985111908 hasRelatedWork W2393142055 @default.
• W1985111908 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1985111908 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1985111908 magId "1985111908" @default.
• W1985111908 workType "article" @default.