FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1985488407> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1985488407 endingPage "725.e2" @default.
• W1985488407 startingPage "715" @default.
• W1985488407 abstract "Open revascularization (OR) has been the treatment of choice for chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) for many years, but endovascular revascularization (EV) has been increasingly used with good short-term results. In this study, we evaluated the comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of EV and OR in patients with CMI refractory to conservative management.A Markov-state transition model was developed using TreeAge Pro 2012 (TreeAge Inc, Williamstown, Mass) to simulate a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 65-year-old female patients with CMI requiring treatment with either OR or EV. Data for the model, including perioperative and long-term overall mortality risks, disease-specific mortality risks, complications, and reintervention and patency rates, were retrieved from original studies and systematic reviews about CMI. Costs were analyzed with the 2013 Medicare database. Outcomes evaluated were quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs from the health care perspective, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Extensive sensitivity analyses were performed and different clinical scenarios evaluated. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to assess robustness of the model.For a reference-case 65-year-old female patient with CMI and an average risk for operation, EV is preferred with 10.03 QALYs (95% credibility interval [CI], 9.76-10.29) vs 9.59 after OR (95% CI, 9.29-9.87). The difference is comparable to 5 months in perfect health: 0.44 QALY (95% CI, 0.13-0.76). For 65-year-old men, this was 8.71 QALYs (95% CI, 8.48-8.94) for EV vs 8.42 (95% CI, 8.14-8.63) for OR. Sensitivity analysis showed that for younger patients, EV results in a higher increase in QALYs compared with older patients. Total expected reinterventions per patient are 1.70 for EV vs 0.30 for OR. Total expected health care costs for the reference-case patient were $39,942 (95% CI, $28,509-$53,380) for OR and $38.217 (95% CI, $29,329-$48,309) for EV. For men, this was $39,375 (95% CI, $28,092-$52,853) for OR and $35,903 (95% CI, $27,685-$45,597) for EV. For patients younger than 60 years, EV is a more expensive treatment strategy compared with OR, but with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for EV of less than $60,000/QALY. For patients 60 years and older, EV dominated OR as preferential treatment because effectiveness was higher than for OR and costs were lower.The results of this decision analysis model suggest that EV is favored over OR for patients with CMI in all age groups. Although EV is associated with more expected reinterventions, EV appears to be cost-effective for all age groups." @default.
• W1985488407 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1985488407 creator A5003753800 @default.
• W1985488407 creator A5014154688 @default.
• W1985488407 creator A5038434940 @default.
• W1985488407 creator A5053633093 @default.
• W1985488407 creator A5061552996 @default.
• W1985488407 creator A5087768547 @default.
• W1985488407 date "2014-09-01" @default.
• W1985488407 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W1985488407 title "A comparison of open and endovascular revascularization for chronic mesenteric ischemia in a clinical decision model" @default.
• W1985488407 cites W129847495 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W1979084017 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W1985010442 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W1987518313 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W1989225884 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W1993386696 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W1995716148 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W1999789157 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W2017406310 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W2020989640 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W2030086355 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W2043835320 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W2047720960 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W2048629206 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W2049317033 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W2050556423 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W2050716480 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W2061317386 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W2061426735 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W2068232921 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W2082117389 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W2093184780 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W2093871458 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W2100908465 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W2104202991 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W2109973077 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W2119440126 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W2120775384 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W2132540187 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W2164654252 @default.
• W1985488407 cites W2172124650 @default.
• W1985488407 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.009" @default.
• W1985488407 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24721175" @default.
• W1985488407 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W1985488407 type Work @default.
• W1985488407 sameAs 1985488407 @default.
• W1985488407 citedByCount "36" @default.
• W1985488407 countsByYear W19854884072015 @default.
• W1985488407 countsByYear W19854884072016 @default.
• W1985488407 countsByYear W19854884072017 @default.
• W1985488407 countsByYear W19854884072018 @default.
• W1985488407 countsByYear W19854884072019 @default.
• W1985488407 countsByYear W19854884072020 @default.
• W1985488407 countsByYear W19854884072021 @default.
• W1985488407 countsByYear W19854884072022 @default.
• W1985488407 countsByYear W19854884072023 @default.
• W1985488407 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1985488407 hasAuthorship W1985488407A5003753800 @default.
• W1985488407 hasAuthorship W1985488407A5014154688 @default.
• W1985488407 hasAuthorship W1985488407A5038434940 @default.
• W1985488407 hasAuthorship W1985488407A5053633093 @default.
• W1985488407 hasAuthorship W1985488407A5061552996 @default.
• W1985488407 hasAuthorship W1985488407A5087768547 @default.
• W1985488407 hasBestOaLocation W19854884071 @default.
• W1985488407 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W1985488407 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1985488407 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1985488407 hasConcept C2779464278 @default.
• W1985488407 hasConcept C3019080777 @default.
• W1985488407 hasConcept C31174226 @default.
• W1985488407 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W1985488407 hasConcept C500558357 @default.
• W1985488407 hasConcept C64332521 @default.
• W1985488407 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1985488407 hasConcept C72563966 @default.
• W1985488407 hasConceptScore W1985488407C112930515 @default.
• W1985488407 hasConceptScore W1985488407C126322002 @default.
• W1985488407 hasConceptScore W1985488407C141071460 @default.
• W1985488407 hasConceptScore W1985488407C2779464278 @default.
• W1985488407 hasConceptScore W1985488407C3019080777 @default.
• W1985488407 hasConceptScore W1985488407C31174226 @default.
• W1985488407 hasConceptScore W1985488407C44249647 @default.
• W1985488407 hasConceptScore W1985488407C500558357 @default.
• W1985488407 hasConceptScore W1985488407C64332521 @default.
• W1985488407 hasConceptScore W1985488407C71924100 @default.
• W1985488407 hasConceptScore W1985488407C72563966 @default.
• W1985488407 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W1985488407 hasLocation W19854884071 @default.
• W1985488407 hasLocation W19854884072 @default.
• W1985488407 hasOpenAccess W1985488407 @default.
• W1985488407 hasPrimaryLocation W19854884071 @default.
• W1985488407 hasRelatedWork W1565078889 @default.
• W1985488407 hasRelatedWork W2002835333 @default.
• W1985488407 hasRelatedWork W2043907370 @default.
• W1985488407 hasRelatedWork W2050805899 @default.
• W1985488407 hasRelatedWork W2055983460 @default.
• W1985488407 hasRelatedWork W2091852217 @default.

• next