Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1985786076> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 55 of
55
with 100 items per page.
- W1985786076 endingPage "330" @default.
- W1985786076 startingPage "330" @default.
- W1985786076 abstract "Objectives To evaluate the clinical performance of a compomer material (Dyract®) in comparison with dental amalgam (Contour®) for management of proximal caries in primary molars in young children. Setting General dental practice, and a dental hospital paediatric clinic. Method This was a prospective study. A split mouth design was used with identical pairs of minimal Class II cavities, of matched tooth type in the same dental arch, usually diagnosed with the use of bitewing radiographs. Seventy-eight pairs of restorations were completed of which 60 pairs were available for evaluation after 24 months. Results Comparable retention rates were observed for both Dyract and amalgam. The retention rates were high for both materials, with only four amalgam and two Dyract restorations failing over 24 months. Significantly better marginal integrity (p < 0.05) was observed for Dyract compared with amalgam with no significant differences between the two materials for recurrent caries, wear or surface texture. Conclusions Dyract seemed to be a suitable alternative to amalgam for proximal restorations in primary molars of young children for use in general dental practice." @default.
- W1985786076 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1985786076 creator A5069014832 @default.
- W1985786076 date "2002-09-01" @default.
- W1985786076 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W1985786076 title "A comparison of the performance of a compomer and an amalgam" @default.
- W1985786076 cites W1999597360 @default.
- W1985786076 cites W2395807239 @default.
- W1985786076 doi "https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801558" @default.
- W1985786076 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
- W1985786076 type Work @default.
- W1985786076 sameAs 1985786076 @default.
- W1985786076 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W1985786076 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1985786076 hasAuthorship W1985786076A5069014832 @default.
- W1985786076 hasBestOaLocation W19857860761 @default.
- W1985786076 hasConcept C147789679 @default.
- W1985786076 hasConcept C17525397 @default.
- W1985786076 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
- W1985786076 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
- W1985786076 hasConcept C202271784 @default.
- W1985786076 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
- W1985786076 hasConcept C2991918945 @default.
- W1985786076 hasConcept C51795115 @default.
- W1985786076 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W1985786076 hasConceptScore W1985786076C147789679 @default.
- W1985786076 hasConceptScore W1985786076C17525397 @default.
- W1985786076 hasConceptScore W1985786076C185592680 @default.
- W1985786076 hasConceptScore W1985786076C199343813 @default.
- W1985786076 hasConceptScore W1985786076C202271784 @default.
- W1985786076 hasConceptScore W1985786076C29694066 @default.
- W1985786076 hasConceptScore W1985786076C2991918945 @default.
- W1985786076 hasConceptScore W1985786076C51795115 @default.
- W1985786076 hasConceptScore W1985786076C71924100 @default.
- W1985786076 hasIssue "6" @default.
- W1985786076 hasLocation W19857860761 @default.
- W1985786076 hasOpenAccess W1985786076 @default.
- W1985786076 hasPrimaryLocation W19857860761 @default.
- W1985786076 hasRelatedWork W2043930107 @default.
- W1985786076 hasRelatedWork W2074471627 @default.
- W1985786076 hasRelatedWork W2130914703 @default.
- W1985786076 hasRelatedWork W2153399379 @default.
- W1985786076 hasRelatedWork W2354481634 @default.
- W1985786076 hasRelatedWork W2379657369 @default.
- W1985786076 hasRelatedWork W2382284890 @default.
- W1985786076 hasRelatedWork W2413072844 @default.
- W1985786076 hasRelatedWork W3183712368 @default.
- W1985786076 hasRelatedWork W2340898963 @default.
- W1985786076 hasVolume "193" @default.
- W1985786076 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1985786076 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1985786076 magId "1985786076" @default.
- W1985786076 workType "article" @default.