FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1985857422> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1985857422 endingPage "320" @default.
• W1985857422 startingPage "317" @default.
• W1985857422 abstract "Previous articleNext article No AccessLetters to the EditorsSearch Strategies and the Adaptive Significance of Switching in Some General PredatorsHoward CornellHoward Cornell Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmailPrint SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 110, Number 972Mar. - Apr., 1976 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/283068 Views: 15Total views on this site Citations: 82Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1976 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Jordan P. Cuff, Maximillian P.T.G. Tercel, Lorna E. Drake, Ian P. Vaughan, James R. Bell, Pablo Orozco‐terWengel, Carsten T. Müller, William O.C. Symondson Density‐independent prey choice, taxonomy, life history, and web characteristics determine the diet and biocontrol potential of spiders (Linyphiidae and Lycosidae) in cereal crops, Environmental DNA 4, no.33 (Dec 2021): 549–564.https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.272Jean V. Adams, Michael L. Jones Evidence of host switching: Sea lampreys disproportionately attack Chinook salmon when lake trout abundance is low in Lake Ontario, Journal of Great Lakes Research 47 (Dec 2021): S604–S611.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2020.03.003Henry Murillo Pacheco, Sherah L. Vanlaerhoven, M. Ángeles Marcos García Functional response and switching behaviour of Campoletis sonorensis (Cameron) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) to the native host Trichoplusia ni and the non-native host Chrysodeixis chalcites mediating host range expansion, Biocontrol Science and Technology 30, no.55 (Mar 2020): 462–479.https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2020.1734185Eric J. Nordberg, Lin Schwarzkopf Predation risk is a function of alternative prey availability rather than predator abundance in a tropical savanna woodland ecosystem, Scientific Reports 9, no.11 (May 2019).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44159-6Richard M. Francksen, Nicholas J. Aebischer, Sonja C. Ludwig, David Baines, Mark J. Whittingham, Benjamin Lee Allen Measures of predator diet alone may underestimate the collective impact on prey: Common buzzard Buteo buteo consumption of economically important red grouse Lagopus lagopus scotica, PLOS ONE 14, no.88 (Aug 2019): e0221404.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221404Armando Falcón-Brindis, Ricardo Rodríguez-Estrella, María Luisa Jiménez, Kleber Del-Claro , PLOS ONE 14, no.1111 ( 2019): e0225266.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225266Alex Grendelmeier, Raphaël Arlettaz, Gilberto Pasinelli Numerical response of mammalian carnivores to rodents affects bird reproduction in temperate forests: A case of apparent competition?, Ecology and Evolution 8, no.2323 (Nov 2018): 11596–11608.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4608Maryam Hassanzadeh-Avval, Hussein Sadeghi-Namaghi, Lida Fekrat Prey preference and prey switching in Anthocoris minki Dohrn (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae), Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology 21, no.44 (Dec 2018): 1116–1121.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2018.08.007F. Carotenuto, M. Di Febbraro, M. Melchionna, A. Mondanaro, S. Castiglione, C. Serio, L. Rook, A. Loy, M.S. Lima-Ribeiro, J.A.F. Diniz-Filho, P. Raia The well-behaved killer: Late Pleistocene humans in Eurasia were significantly associated with living megafauna only, Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 500 (Jul 2018): 24–32.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2018.03.036Åshild Ø. Pedersen, Jennifer Stien, Pernille B. Eidesen, Rolf A. Ims, Jane U. Jepsen, Audun Stien, Ingunn Tombre, Eva Fuglei High goose abundance reduces nest predation risk in a simple rodent-free high-Arctic ecosystem, Polar Biology 41, no.44 (Dec 2017): 619–627.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-017-2223-zJENNIFER E. WELSH, CAROLINE LIDDELL, JAAP VAN DER MEER, DAVID W. THIELTGES Parasites as prey: the effect of cercarial density and alternative prey on consumption of cercariae by four non-host species, Parasitology 144, no.1313 (Jul 2017): 1775–1782.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182017001056Richard M. Francksen, Mark J. Whittingham, Sonja C. Ludwig, Staffan Roos, David Baines Numerical and functional responses of Common Buzzards Buteo buteo to prey abundance on a Scottish grouse moor, Ibis 159, no.33 (Mar 2017): 541–553.https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12471Antonio J. Carpio, J. C. Castro-Caro, F. S. Tortosa The Influence of Nest Density on Nest Predation in Olive Groves Depends on Habitat Features, Ardeola 63, no.22 (Jul 2016): 237–250.https://doi.org/10.13157/arla.63.2.2016.ra1 Habitat-use and Specialisation among Coral Reef Damselfishes, (Aug 2016): 84–121.https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315373874-6Debaldev Jana, Santanu Ray Impact of physical and behavioral prey refuge on the stability and bifurcation of Gause type Filippov prey-predator system, Modeling Earth Systems and Environment 2, no.11 (Jan 2016).https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0077-yNan Wang, Min Zhao, Hengguo Yu, Chuanjun Dai, Beibei Wang, Pengfei Wang Bifurcation Behavior Analysis in a Predator-Prey Model, Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 2016 (Jan 2016): 1–11.https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3565316Dagmara Wójcik, Monika Normant, Barbara Dmochowska, Amy Fowler Impact of Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis on blue mussel Mytilus edulis trossulus – laboratory studies of claw strength, handling behavior, consumption rate, and size selective predation, Oceanologia 57, no.33 (Jul 2015): 263–270.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceano.2015.03.003Laura McKinnon, Dominique Berteaux, Joël Bêty Predator-mediated interactions between lemmings and shorebirds: A test of the alternative prey hypothesis, The Auk 131, no.44 (Oct 2014): 619–628.https://doi.org/10.1642/AUK-13-154.1Yunlong Zhao, Dunsong Li, Min Zhang, Wei Chen, Guren Zhang Food source affects the expression of vitellogenin and fecundity of a biological control agent, Neoseiulus cucumeris, Experimental and Applied Acarology 63, no.33 (Feb 2014): 333–347.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-014-9781-3Chandra E. Moffat, Robert G. Lalonde, David J. Ensing, Rosemarie A. De Clerck-Floate, Gitta Grosskopf-Lachat, Jason Pither Frequency-dependent host species use by a candidate biological control insect within its native European range, Biological Control 67, no.33 (Dec 2013): 498–508.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2013.10.007Laura Mckinnon, Dominique Berteaux, Gilles Gauthier, Joël Bêty Predator-mediated interactions between preferred, alternative and incidental prey in the arctic tundra, Oikos 122, no.77 (Dec 2012): 1042–1048.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20708.xJennifer Paur, David A. Gray Individual consistency, learning and memory in a parasitoid fly, Ormia ochracea, Animal Behaviour 82, no.44 (Oct 2011): 825–830.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.07.017 10.1007/BF02385116, CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs 134 (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02385116Andrew Chow, Amanda Chau, Kevin M. Heinz Compatibility of Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) with Amblyseius (Iphiseius) degenerans (Acari: Phytoseiidae) for control of Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on greenhouse roses, Biological Control 44, no.22 (Feb 2008): 259–270.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.11.002T. Brévault, S. Quilici Influence of habitat pattern on orientation during host fruit location in the tomato fruit fly, Neoceratitis cyanescens, Bulletin of Entomological Research 97, no.66 (Nov 2007): 637–642.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485307005330Peter A. Abrams, Hiroyuki Matsuda Population dynamical consequences of reduced predator switching at low total prey densities, Population Ecology 45, no.33 (Dec 2003): 175–185.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-003-0159-3Valeria Fernández-arhex, Juan C. Corley The Functional Response of Parasitoids and its Implications for Biological Control, Biocontrol Science and Technology 13, no.44 (Jun 2003): 403–413.https://doi.org/10.1080/0958315031000104523M. Salome Morte, Manuel J. Redon, Antonio Sanz-Brau Feeding Habits of Trisopterus minutus capelanus (Gadidae) Off the Eastern Coast of Spain (Western Mediterranean), Marine Ecology 22, no.33 (Sep 2001): 215–229.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0485.2001.01731.xJason Jones, Ryan D. DeBruyn, Jennifer J. Barg, Raleigh J. Robertson ASSESSING THE EFFECTS OF NATURAL DISTURBANCE ON A NEOTROPICAL MIGRANT SONGBIRD, Ecology 82, no.99 (Sep 2001): 2628–2635.https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2628:ATEOND]2.0.CO;2M. P. Hassell Host-parasitoid population dynamics*, Journal of Animal Ecology 69, no.44 (Jul 2000): 543–566.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00445.xPeter A. Follett, M. Tracy Johnson, Vincent P. Jones Parasitoid Drift in Hawaiian Pentatomoids, (Jan 2000): 77–93.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4577-4_6Tiit Teder, Toomas Tammaru, Rein Pedmanson Patterns of host use in solitary parasitoids (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae): field evidence from a homogeneous habitat, Ecography 22, no.11 (Feb 1999): 79–86.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1999.tb00456.xV. Vassilopoulou, C. Papaconstantinou Feeding habits of red mullet (Mullus barbatus) in a gulf in western Greece, Fisheries Research 16, no.11 (Feb 1993): 69–83.https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-7836(93)90110-STHOMAS N. SHERRATT, IAN F. HARVEY Frequency-dependent food selection by arthropods: a review, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 48, no.22 (Jan 2008): 167–186.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1993.tb00885.xFranz Uiblein Expectancy controlled sampling decisions in Vimba elongata, Environmental Biology of Fishes 33, no.33 (Mar 1992): 311–316.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00005877Rachid Hanna, L.Theodore Wilson Prey preference by Metaseiulus occidentalis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and the role of prey aggregation, Biological Control 1, no.11 (Jun 1991): 51–58.https://doi.org/10.1016/1049-9644(91)90101-5Ian D. Thompson, Patrick W. Colgan Prey choice by marten during a decline in prey abundance, Oecologia 83, no.44 (Jul 1990): 443–451.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317193L. E. M. Vet, W. J. Lewis, D. R. Papaj, J. C. van Lenteren A variable-response model for parasitoid foraging behavior, Journal of Insect Behavior 3, no.44 (Jul 1990): 471–490.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01052012William Sheehan, A. M. Shelton The role of experience in plant foraging by the aphid parasitoidDiaeretiella rapae (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae), Journal of Insect Behavior 2, no.66 (Nov 1989): 743–759.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049398A. W. Logue Research on self-control: An integrating framework, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.44 (Feb 2010): 665–679.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053978George Ainslie Matching is the integrating framework, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.44 (Feb 2010): 679–680.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0005398XThomas Caraco On the careful use of ecological models, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.44 (Feb 2010): 680–681.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053991Charles S. Carver On goals, perceptions, and self-control, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.44 (Feb 2010): 681–682.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00054005Robert Eisenberger Perceptions and learning in self-control, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.44 (Feb 2010): 682–683.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00054017Edmund Fantino, Ray Preston Foraging for integration, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.44 (Feb 2010): 683–684.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00054029Leonard Green, Edwin B. Fisher Self-control in context, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.44 (Feb 2010): 684–685.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00054030John M. Hinson The conflicting psychologies of self-control: A way out?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.44 (Feb 2010): 685–686.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00054042Alasdair I. Houston, John M. McNamara In delay there lies no plenty, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.44 (Feb 2010): 686–687.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00054054Sumio Imada, Hiroshi Imada Self-restraint: A type of self-control in an approach-avoidance situation, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.44 (Feb 2010): 687–688.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00054066Julius Kuhl Functional characteristics of human self-control, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.44 (Feb 2010): 688–688.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00054078C. Fergus Lowe, Pauline J. Home On the origins of selves and self-control, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.44 (Feb 2010): 689–690.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0005408XJames E. Mazur, R. J. Herrnstein On the functions relating delay, reinforcer value, and behavior, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.44 (Feb 2010): 690–691.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00054091Jay Moore Evolution and impulsiveness, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.44 (Feb 2010): 691–691.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00054108Douglas J. Navarick Spurious self-control: Potential outcome in research with humans, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.44 (Feb 2010): 691–692.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0005411XOvide F. Pomerleau, Cynthia S. Pomerleau On observing the unobservable, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.44 (Feb 2010): 692–692.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00054121Eliot Shimoff, A. Charles Catania Self-control and the panda's thumb, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.44 (Feb 2010): 693–693.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00054133Edmund J. S. Sonuga-Barke Misinterpreting Mischel, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.44 (Feb 2010): 693–694.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00054145William Timberlake Evolution, behavior systems, and “self-control”: The fit between organism and test environment, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.44 (Feb 2010): 694–695.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00054157Norio Yamamura Not all models are on the same level: Empirical law and hypothesis, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.44 (Feb 2010): 695–696.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00054169Michael D. Zeiler Evolution is not rational banking, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.44 (Feb 2010): 696–697.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00054170A. W. Logue Working toward the big reinforcer: Integration, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.44 (Feb 2010): 697–709.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00054182G. J. Scrimgeour, M. J. Winterbourn Diet, food resource partitioning and feeding periodicity of two riffle-dwelling fish species in a New Zealand river, Journal of Fish Biology 31, no.33 (Sep 1987): 309–324.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1987.tb05238.xRussell D. Gray Faith and Foraging: A Critique of the “Paradigm Argument from Design”, (Jan 1987): 69–140.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1839-2_2Robert J. Davidson Mussel selection by the paddle crab Ovalipes catharus (White): Evidence of flexible foraging behaviour, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 102, no.2-32-3 (Nov 1986): 281–299.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(86)90182-6Mateen M Rizki, Michael Conrad Computing the theory of evolution, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 22, no.1-31-3 (Oct 1986): 83–99.https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(86)90235-6James R. Bence Feeding rate and attack specialization: the roles of predator experience and energetic tradeoffs, Environmental Biology of Fishes 16, no.1-31-3 (Jun 1986): 113–121.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00005164James R. Bence Feeding rate and attack specialization: the roles of predator experience and energetic tradeoffs, (Jan 1986): 113–122.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1158-6_9Thomas E. Martin Resource selection by tropical frugivorous birds: integrating multiple interactions, Oecologia 66, no.44 (Jul 1985): 563–573.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379351Thomas W. Neumann The Opossum Problem: Implications for Human-Wildlife Competition over Plant Foods, North American Archaeologist 5, no.44 (Nov 2016): 287–313.https://doi.org/10.2190/Q6ER-LBUP-HDM2-1519Darryl E. Jory, Melbourne R. Carriker, Edwin S. Iversen PREVENTING PREDATION IN MOLLUSCAN MARICULTURE: AN OVERVIEW, Journal of the World Mariculture Society 15, no.1-41-4 (Mar 2009): 421–432.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.1984.tb00176.xMaureen L. Stanton Short-term learning and the searching accuracy of egg-laying butterflies, Animal Behaviour 32, no.11 (Feb 1984): 33–40.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(84)80321-8 Robert D. Holt Optimal Foraging and the Form of the Predator Isocline, The American Naturalist 122, no.44 (Oct 2015): 521–541.https://doi.org/10.1086/284153 Thomas E. Lacher, Jr. , Michael R. Willig , and Michael A. Mares Food Preference as a Function of Resource Abundance with Multiple Prey Types: An Experimental Analysis of Optimal Foraging Theory, The American Naturalist 120, no.33 (Oct 2015): 297–316.https://doi.org/10.1086/283992Richard S. Ostfeld Foraging strategies and prey switching in the California sea otter, Oecologia 53, no.22 (Jan 1982): 170–178.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00545660Jennifer A. Kitchell, Christofer H. Boggs, James F. Kitchell, James A. Rice Prey Selection by naticid gastropods: experimental tests and application to the fossil record, Paleobiology 7, no.44 (Feb 2016): 533–552.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0094837300025574J.E.R. Staddon Optimality Analyses of Operant Behavior and Their Relation to Optimal Foraging, (Jan 1980): 101–141.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-662650-6.50010-6Nils Chr. Stenseth, and Lennart Hansson Optimal Food Selection: A Graphic Model, The American Naturalist 113, no.33 (Oct 2015): 373–389.https://doi.org/10.1086/283396 Roger N. Hughes Optimal Diets under the Energy Maximization Premise: The Effects of Recognition Time and Learning, The American Naturalist 113, no.22 (Oct 2015): 209–221.https://doi.org/10.1086/283380R. J. PROKOPY, E. D. OWENS VISUAL GENERALIST WITH VISUAL SPECIALIST PHYTOPHAGOUS INSECTS: HOST SELECTION BEHAVIOUR AND APPLICATION TO MANAGEMENT, Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 24, no.33 (Apr 2011): 609–620.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.1978.tb02824.x Mark Westoby What are the Biological Bases of Varied Diets?, The American Naturalist 112, no.985985 (Oct 2015): 627–631.https://doi.org/10.1086/283303 E. G. Matthews Signal-Based Frequency-Dependent Defense Strategies and the Evolution of Mimicry, The American Naturalist 111, no.978978 (Oct 2015): 213–222.https://doi.org/10.1086/283156Peter R. Atsatt, Dennis J. O'Dowd Plant Defense Guilds, Science 193, no.42474247 (Jul 1976): 24–29.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.193.4247.24" @default.
• W1985857422 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1985857422 creator A5010875487 @default.
• W1985857422 date "1976-03-01" @default.
• W1985857422 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W1985857422 title "Search Strategies and the Adaptive Significance of Switching in Some General Predators" @default.
• W1985857422 cites W1994032620 @default.
• W1985857422 cites W2001394710 @default.
• W1985857422 cites W2032839068 @default.
• W1985857422 cites W2164831503 @default.
• W1985857422 cites W2328076729 @default.
• W1985857422 cites W45451037 @default.
• W1985857422 doi "https://doi.org/10.1086/283068" @default.
• W1985857422 hasPublicationYear "1976" @default.
• W1985857422 type Work @default.
• W1985857422 sameAs 1985857422 @default.
• W1985857422 citedByCount "102" @default.
• W1985857422 countsByYear W19858574222012 @default.
• W1985857422 countsByYear W19858574222013 @default.
• W1985857422 countsByYear W19858574222014 @default.
• W1985857422 countsByYear W19858574222015 @default.
• W1985857422 countsByYear W19858574222016 @default.
• W1985857422 countsByYear W19858574222017 @default.
• W1985857422 countsByYear W19858574222018 @default.
• W1985857422 countsByYear W19858574222019 @default.
• W1985857422 countsByYear W19858574222020 @default.
• W1985857422 countsByYear W19858574222021 @default.
• W1985857422 countsByYear W19858574222023 @default.
• W1985857422 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1985857422 hasAuthorship W1985857422A5010875487 @default.
• W1985857422 hasConcept C188382862 @default.
• W1985857422 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W1985857422 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1985857422 hasConceptScore W1985857422C188382862 @default.
• W1985857422 hasConceptScore W1985857422C18903297 @default.
• W1985857422 hasConceptScore W1985857422C86803240 @default.
• W1985857422 hasIssue "972" @default.
• W1985857422 hasLocation W19858574221 @default.
• W1985857422 hasOpenAccess W1985857422 @default.
• W1985857422 hasPrimaryLocation W19858574221 @default.
• W1985857422 hasRelatedWork W1966079542 @default.
• W1985857422 hasRelatedWork W1990949688 @default.
• W1985857422 hasRelatedWork W2022853094 @default.
• W1985857422 hasRelatedWork W2045627274 @default.
• W1985857422 hasRelatedWork W2095642794 @default.
• W1985857422 hasRelatedWork W2126000116 @default.
• W1985857422 hasRelatedWork W2148523899 @default.
• W1985857422 hasRelatedWork W2329769991 @default.
• W1985857422 hasRelatedWork W2753642759 @default.
• W1985857422 hasRelatedWork W2911818402 @default.
• W1985857422 hasVolume "110" @default.
• W1985857422 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1985857422 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1985857422 magId "1985857422" @default.
• W1985857422 workType "article" @default.