FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1986054364> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1986054364 endingPage "710" @default.
• W1986054364 startingPage "705" @default.
• W1986054364 abstract "Purpose To evaluate the distribution of central corneal thickness (CCT) and its associations in an adult Indian population. Design Population-based study. Participants The Central India Eye and Medical Study is a population-based study performed in a rural region close to Nagpur in Central India; it included 4711 subjects (ages 30+ years) of 5885 eligible subjects (response rate, 80.1%). Methods The participants underwent a detailed ophthalmic and medical examination, including 200 standardized questions on socioeconomic background, lifestyle, social relations, and psychiatric depression. This study was focused on CCT as measured by sonography and its associations. Intraocular pressure was measured by applanation tonometry. Main Outcome Measures Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure. Results Central corneal thickness measurement data were available on 9370 (99.4%) eyes. Mean CCT was 514±33 μm (median, 517 μm; range, 290–696 μm). By multiple regression analysis, CCT was associated significantly with younger age (P<0.001), male gender (P<0.001), higher body mass index (P = 0.006), lower corneal refractive power (P<0.001), deeper anterior chamber (P = 0.02), thicker lens (P = 0.02), and shorter axial length (P = 0.006). Central corneal thickness was not associated significantly with refractive error (P = 0.54) or cylindrical refractive error (P = 0.20). If eyes with a corneal refractive power of 45 or more diopters were excluded, the relationship between CCT and axial length was no longer statistically significant (P>0.05), whereas all other relationships remained significant. Intraocular pressure readings increased significantly (P<0.001) with both higher CCT and higher corneal refractive power. Conclusions Indians from rural Central India have markedly thinner corneas than do Caucasians or Chinese, and, as in other populations, CCT is greater in men. CCT was associated with younger age, higher body mass index, lower corneal refractive power, deeper anterior chamber, thicker lens, and shorter axial length. Intraocular pressure readings were associated with CCT, with high readings in those eyes that had thick corneas or steep corneas. Central corneal thickness and steepness of the anterior corneal surface may thus both have to be taken into account when applanation tonometry is performed. Financial Disclosure(s) The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article. To evaluate the distribution of central corneal thickness (CCT) and its associations in an adult Indian population. Population-based study. The Central India Eye and Medical Study is a population-based study performed in a rural region close to Nagpur in Central India; it included 4711 subjects (ages 30+ years) of 5885 eligible subjects (response rate, 80.1%). The participants underwent a detailed ophthalmic and medical examination, including 200 standardized questions on socioeconomic background, lifestyle, social relations, and psychiatric depression. This study was focused on CCT as measured by sonography and its associations. Intraocular pressure was measured by applanation tonometry. Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure. Central corneal thickness measurement data were available on 9370 (99.4%) eyes. Mean CCT was 514±33 μm (median, 517 μm; range, 290–696 μm). By multiple regression analysis, CCT was associated significantly with younger age (P<0.001), male gender (P<0.001), higher body mass index (P = 0.006), lower corneal refractive power (P<0.001), deeper anterior chamber (P = 0.02), thicker lens (P = 0.02), and shorter axial length (P = 0.006). Central corneal thickness was not associated significantly with refractive error (P = 0.54) or cylindrical refractive error (P = 0.20). If eyes with a corneal refractive power of 45 or more diopters were excluded, the relationship between CCT and axial length was no longer statistically significant (P>0.05), whereas all other relationships remained significant. Intraocular pressure readings increased significantly (P<0.001) with both higher CCT and higher corneal refractive power. Indians from rural Central India have markedly thinner corneas than do Caucasians or Chinese, and, as in other populations, CCT is greater in men. CCT was associated with younger age, higher body mass index, lower corneal refractive power, deeper anterior chamber, thicker lens, and shorter axial length. Intraocular pressure readings were associated with CCT, with high readings in those eyes that had thick corneas or steep corneas. Central corneal thickness and steepness of the anterior corneal surface may thus both have to be taken into account when applanation tonometry is performed." @default.
• W1986054364 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1986054364 creator A5005624185 @default.
• W1986054364 creator A5044377553 @default.
• W1986054364 creator A5051037169 @default.
• W1986054364 creator A5072265752 @default.
• W1986054364 creator A5082561940 @default.
• W1986054364 date "2010-04-01" @default.
• W1986054364 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W1986054364 title "Central Corneal Thickness and Its Association with Ocular and General Parameters in Indians: The Central India Eye and Medical Study" @default.
• W1986054364 cites W1907435754 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W1956294409 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W1969452398 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W1975088893 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W1976656431 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W1982809654 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W1987199468 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W1992210537 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W1995312072 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W1998956848 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W2002544312 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W2005328076 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W2016063426 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W2017341067 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W2019880619 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W2024835058 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W2025993839 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W2031227357 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W2033867289 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W2038885610 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W2044543501 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W2058441060 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W2066300602 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W2070158455 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W2077037485 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W2085076314 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W2091446930 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W2093952772 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W2120711134 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W2135185351 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W2135462975 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W2145872654 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W2148584466 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W2162947593 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W2561069604 @default.
• W1986054364 cites W4210967428 @default.
• W1986054364 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.09.003" @default.
• W1986054364 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20045561" @default.
• W1986054364 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W1986054364 type Work @default.
• W1986054364 sameAs 1986054364 @default.
• W1986054364 citedByCount "78" @default.
• W1986054364 countsByYear W19860543642012 @default.
• W1986054364 countsByYear W19860543642013 @default.
• W1986054364 countsByYear W19860543642014 @default.
• W1986054364 countsByYear W19860543642015 @default.
• W1986054364 countsByYear W19860543642016 @default.
• W1986054364 countsByYear W19860543642017 @default.
• W1986054364 countsByYear W19860543642018 @default.
• W1986054364 countsByYear W19860543642019 @default.
• W1986054364 countsByYear W19860543642020 @default.
• W1986054364 countsByYear W19860543642021 @default.
• W1986054364 countsByYear W19860543642022 @default.
• W1986054364 countsByYear W19860543642023 @default.
• W1986054364 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1986054364 hasAuthorship W1986054364A5005624185 @default.
• W1986054364 hasAuthorship W1986054364A5044377553 @default.
• W1986054364 hasAuthorship W1986054364A5051037169 @default.
• W1986054364 hasAuthorship W1986054364A5072265752 @default.
• W1986054364 hasAuthorship W1986054364A5082561940 @default.
• W1986054364 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W1986054364 hasConcept C119767625 @default.
• W1986054364 hasConcept C259533 @default.
• W1986054364 hasConcept C2776882836 @default.
• W1986054364 hasConcept C2778257484 @default.
• W1986054364 hasConcept C2781092963 @default.
• W1986054364 hasConcept C2781135284 @default.
• W1986054364 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W1986054364 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1986054364 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W1986054364 hasConceptScore W1986054364C118487528 @default.
• W1986054364 hasConceptScore W1986054364C119767625 @default.
• W1986054364 hasConceptScore W1986054364C259533 @default.
• W1986054364 hasConceptScore W1986054364C2776882836 @default.
• W1986054364 hasConceptScore W1986054364C2778257484 @default.
• W1986054364 hasConceptScore W1986054364C2781092963 @default.
• W1986054364 hasConceptScore W1986054364C2781135284 @default.
• W1986054364 hasConceptScore W1986054364C2908647359 @default.
• W1986054364 hasConceptScore W1986054364C71924100 @default.
• W1986054364 hasConceptScore W1986054364C99454951 @default.
• W1986054364 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W1986054364 hasLocation W19860543641 @default.
• W1986054364 hasLocation W19860543642 @default.
• W1986054364 hasOpenAccess W1986054364 @default.
• W1986054364 hasPrimaryLocation W19860543641 @default.
• W1986054364 hasRelatedWork W1717315194 @default.
• W1986054364 hasRelatedWork W2059953029 @default.
• W1986054364 hasRelatedWork W2083248541 @default.

• next