FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1987552012> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1987552012 abstract "Abstract Background In this study the focus is on social insurance officers judging applications for disability pensions. The number of applications for disability pension increased during the late 1990s, which has resulted in an increasing number of disability pensions in Sweden. A more restrictive attitude towards the clients has however evolved, as societal costs have increased and governmental guidelines now focus on reducing costs. As a consequence, the quantitative and qualitative demands on social insurance officers when handling applications for disability pensions may have increased. The aim of this study was therefore to describe the social insurance officers' experiences of assessing applications for disability pensions after the government's introduction of stricter regulations. Methods Qualitative methodology was employed and a total of ten social insurance officers representing different experiences and ages were chosen. Open-ended interviews were performed with the ten social insurance officers. Data was analysed with inductive content analysis. Results Three themes could be identified as problematic in the social insurance officers' descriptions of dealing with the applications in order to reach a decision on whether the issue qualified applicants for a disability pension or not: 1. Clients are heterogeneous. 2. Ineffective and time consuming waiting for medical certificates impede the decision process. 3. Perspectives on the issue of work capacity differed among different stakeholders. The backgrounds of the clients differ considerably, leading to variation in the quality and content of applications. Social insurance officers had to make rapid decisions within a limited time frame, based on limited information, mainly on the basis of medical certificates that were often insufficient to judge work capacity. The role as coordinating actor with other stakeholders in the welfare system was perceived as frustrating, since different stakeholders have different goals and demands. The social insurance officers experience lack of control over the decision process, as regulations and other stakeholders restrict their work. Conclusion A picture emerges of difficulties due to disharmonized systems, stakeholder-bound goals causing some clients to fall between two stools, or leading to unnecessary waiting times, which may limit the clients' ability to take an active part in a constructive process. Increased communication with physicians about how to elaborate the medical certificates might improve the quality of certificates and thereby reduce the clients waiting time." @default.
• W1987552012 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1987552012 creator A5053780026 @default.
• W1987552012 creator A5059658435 @default.
• W1987552012 creator A5077082158 @default.
• W1987552012 date "2007-06-27" @default.
• W1987552012 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W1987552012 title "Swedish social insurance officers' experiences of difficulties in assessing applications for disability pensions – an interview study" @default.
• W1987552012 cites W1896070529 @default.
• W1987552012 cites W1977795623 @default.
• W1987552012 cites W1978707847 @default.
• W1987552012 cites W1984497580 @default.
• W1987552012 cites W1992016529 @default.
• W1987552012 cites W2016523338 @default.
• W1987552012 cites W2091144025 @default.
• W1987552012 cites W2096565404 @default.
• W1987552012 cites W2126339863 @default.
• W1987552012 cites W2138082739 @default.
• W1987552012 cites W2142951268 @default.
• W1987552012 cites W2267893228 @default.
• W1987552012 cites W257081860 @default.
• W1987552012 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-128" @default.
• W1987552012 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/1913505" @default.
• W1987552012 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17597536" @default.
• W1987552012 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W1987552012 type Work @default.
• W1987552012 sameAs 1987552012 @default.
• W1987552012 citedByCount "25" @default.
• W1987552012 countsByYear W19875520122013 @default.
• W1987552012 countsByYear W19875520122014 @default.
• W1987552012 countsByYear W19875520122016 @default.
• W1987552012 countsByYear W19875520122017 @default.
• W1987552012 countsByYear W19875520122019 @default.
• W1987552012 countsByYear W19875520122020 @default.
• W1987552012 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1987552012 hasAuthorship W1987552012A5053780026 @default.
• W1987552012 hasAuthorship W1987552012A5059658435 @default.
• W1987552012 hasAuthorship W1987552012A5077082158 @default.
• W1987552012 hasBestOaLocation W19875520121 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConcept C140556311 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConcept C162118730 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConcept C172399796 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConcept C2776344727 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConcept C2777111884 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConcept C2779282124 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConcept C2780289447 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConcept C2780899237 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConcept C29513703 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConcept C34447519 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConcept C56995899 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConcept C68799949 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConceptScore W1987552012C10138342 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConceptScore W1987552012C118552586 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConceptScore W1987552012C138816342 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConceptScore W1987552012C138885662 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConceptScore W1987552012C140556311 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConceptScore W1987552012C144024400 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConceptScore W1987552012C144133560 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConceptScore W1987552012C159110408 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConceptScore W1987552012C162118730 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConceptScore W1987552012C162324750 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConceptScore W1987552012C162853370 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConceptScore W1987552012C172399796 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConceptScore W1987552012C190248442 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConceptScore W1987552012C2776344727 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConceptScore W1987552012C2777111884 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConceptScore W1987552012C2778137410 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConceptScore W1987552012C2779282124 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConceptScore W1987552012C2780289447 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConceptScore W1987552012C2780899237 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConceptScore W1987552012C2908647359 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConceptScore W1987552012C29513703 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConceptScore W1987552012C34447519 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConceptScore W1987552012C36289849 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConceptScore W1987552012C41895202 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConceptScore W1987552012C56995899 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConceptScore W1987552012C68799949 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConceptScore W1987552012C71924100 @default.
• W1987552012 hasConceptScore W1987552012C99454951 @default.
• W1987552012 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W1987552012 hasLocation W19875520121 @default.
• W1987552012 hasLocation W19875520122 @default.
• W1987552012 hasLocation W19875520123 @default.
• W1987552012 hasLocation W19875520124 @default.

• next