SemOpenAlex |

SemOpenAlex

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1987692548> ?p ?o ?g. }

Showing items 1 to 91 of 91 with 100 items per page.

W1987692548 endingPage "1075" @default.
W1987692548 startingPage "1071" @default.
W1987692548 abstract "The proceedings of a National Institutes of Health workshop and a meeting of an Advisory Committee of the US Food and Drug Administration,1U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research: Allergenic Products Advisory Committee, May 12, 2011. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/BloodVaccinesandOtherBiologics/AllergenicProductsAdvisoryCommittee/UCM258587.pdf. Accessed May 28, 2014.Google Scholar, 2Togias A. Asthma, Allergy, and Inflammation Branch, Division of Allergy, Immunology and Transplantation, NIAID/NIHEnvironmental exposure units: clinical trial design for validation. National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases/National Institutes of Health, Bethesda2010: 1-12Google Scholar as well as related commentaries,3Bernstein J.A. Correlation between a pollen challenge chamber and a natural allergen exposure study design for eliciting ocular and nasal symptoms: early evidence supporting a paradigm shift in drug investigation?.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012; 130: 128-129Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (16) Google Scholar, 4Devillier P. Le Gall M. Horak F. The allergen challenge chamber: a valuable tool for optimizing the clinical development of pollen immunotherapy.Allergy. 2011; 66: 163-169Crossref PubMed Scopus (46) Google Scholar highlight the utility of an allergen challenge chamber (ACC) for conducting clinical trials for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (AR). Mitigation of factors that might confound the design, analysis, and interpretation of these trials requires a systematic comparison of symptoms present in the natural setting versus those elicited after exposure to aeroallergens in an ACC. In prior studies we conducted out-of-season challenges with 3 separate pollens in patients with seasonal allergy.5Jacobs R.L. Harper N. He W. Andrews C.P. Rather C.G. Ramirez D.A. et al.Responses to ragweed pollen in a pollen challenge chamber versus seasonal exposure identify allergic rhinoconjunctivitis endotypes.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012; 130: 122-127.e8Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (46) Google Scholar, 6Jacobs R.L. Harper N. He W. Andrews C.P. Rather C.G. Ramirez D.A. et al.Effect of confounding cofactors on responses to pollens during natural season versus pollen challenge chamber exposure.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014; 133 (e1-7): 1340-1346Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar Although there was high correlation in symptom scores in the natural pollination seasons and ACC, competing environmental influences (eg, mold) in the natural setting blunted the responsiveness to these pollens, whereas this confounder was not present in the ACC.5Jacobs R.L. Harper N. He W. Andrews C.P. Rather C.G. Ramirez D.A. et al.Responses to ragweed pollen in a pollen challenge chamber versus seasonal exposure identify allergic rhinoconjunctivitis endotypes.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012; 130: 122-127.e8Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (46) Google Scholar, 6Jacobs R.L. Harper N. He W. Andrews C.P. Rather C.G. Ramirez D.A. et al.Effect of confounding cofactors on responses to pollens during natural season versus pollen challenge chamber exposure.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014; 133 (e1-7): 1340-1346Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (21) Google ScholarHowever, most patients with allergy are polysensitized to outdoor (eg, pollens) and indoor (eg, house dust mite [HDM]) aeroallergens. HDM exposure is common, associated with perennial allergy, and a significant risk factor for AR and asthma. Here we compared the symptom dynamics in the natural setting versus the ACC in HDM-sensitive (M+) and nonsensitive (M−) participants meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria shown in Table E1 in this article's Online Repository at www.jacionline.org. M− subjects lacked both a history of AR and skin prick test (SPT) wheal reactivity (≥5 mm) to 17 allergens, including HDM (see Table E2 in this article's Online Repository at www.jacionline.org).The study comprised 4 study phases: a 4-day run-in phase followed by 2 ACC exposure phases (ACC-I and ACC-II) with an intervening 38-day observation phase (Fig 1, A). This design allowed for evaluation of the reproducibility of symptom responses and factors that could potentially confound clinical trials in the ACC, including mediators of nocebo effects,7Bingel U. Avoiding nocebo effects to optimize treatment outcome.JAMA. 2014; 312: 693-694Crossref PubMed Scopus (125) Google Scholar as discussed in the Methods section in this article's Online Repository at www.jacionline.org.The study was conducted in the early fall, when only weed pollens were detected in San Antonio, Texas (Fig 1, A and B).6Jacobs R.L. Harper N. He W. Andrews C.P. Rather C.G. Ramirez D.A. et al.Effect of confounding cofactors on responses to pollens during natural season versus pollen challenge chamber exposure.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014; 133 (e1-7): 1340-1346Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar To mitigate this confounding factor, we selected M+ participants with negative SPT responses for weed pollens (see Table E2). All participants were allergy drug free throughout the study (see Table E3 in this article's Online Repository at www.jacionline.org).Each ACC phase comprised exposure for 3 hours on 4 consecutive days to a purified mite body powder of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Fig 1, A and B, and see the Methods section in this article's Online Repository). The end point we targeted was an increase in instantaneous total symptom scores (iTSSs) of at least 6 units in 50% of participants from baseline levels. To achieve this goal, the ACC was calibrated to deliver 70 to 110 ng/m3 HDM Der p 1 antigen, as measured by means of ELISA (see Table E4 and the Methods section in this article's Online Repository at www.jacionline.org). iTSSs in the ACC and reflective total symptom scores (rTSSs) in the natural setting were recorded by using a 5-point Likert scale (see Table E5 in this article's Online Repository at www.jacionline.org). Of the 40 participants meeting inclusion criteria, 35 (21 M+ and 14 M− participants) completed all 4 study phases, and of these, 13 M+ participants and 1 M− participant had detectable (≥0.35 kU/L) serum specific IgE (ssIgE) to D pteronyssinus. This dichotomy between SPT reactivity but undetectable ssIgE has been reported for many allergens (see the Discussion section in this article's Online Repository at www.jacionline.org).8de Vos G. Skin testing versus serum-specific IgE testing: which is better for diagnosing aeroallergen sensitization and predicting clinical allergy?.Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2014; 14: 430Crossref PubMed Scopus (48) Google Scholar There were no differences in the key demographic characteristics between M+ and M− participants (see Table E6 in this article's Online Repository at www.jacionline.org). Five participants withdrew from the study for nonmedical reasons.M− participants had minimal symptoms in the ACC (mean iTSS, <1; Fig 1, B). In contrast, M+ participants experienced a mean increase of 3 units in the iTSS within 30 minutes of HDM challenge, and iTSSs reached a plateau after approximately 120 minutes (Fig 1, B). There was a high degree of concordance in symptom responses in M+ participants in the ACC recorded by using the Likert and visual analog scales (see Fig E1 in this article's Online Repository at www.jacionline.org). Eleven episodes of bronchospasm occurred in 5 M+ participants, a rate consistent with prior findings.9Horak F. Toth J. Marks B. Stubner U.P. Berger U.E. Jager S. et al.Efficacy and safety relative to placebo of an oral formulation of cetirizine and sustained-release pseudoephedrine in the management of nasal congestion.Allergy. 1998; 53: 849-856Crossref PubMed Scopus (41) Google Scholar These participants exhibited slightly higher total symptom scores (TSSs; see Fig E2 in this article's Online Repository at www.jacionline.org), had greater than 15% improvement in FEV1.0 after treatment with nebulized albuterol, and returned to the ACC without additional exacerbations (see the Discussion section in this article's Online Repository). These findings suggest that M+ participants with mild intermittent asthma can be safely evaluated within ACCs.The concordance in symptom responses during and between ACC-I and ACC-II was high (Fig 1, C, and see Table E7 in this article's Online Repository at www.jacionline.org). In contrast, the correlations between rTSSs recorded in the run-in versus observation phases or between rTSSs versus iTSSs were much lower (see Fig E3 in this article's Online Repository at www.jacionline.org). During ACC-I and ACC-II, an increase in iTSSs of 6 or greater from baseline (pre-exposure) was experienced in greater than 55% of participants (Fig 1, D). While less than 10% of participants had iTSSs of 15 or greater at baseline, 67% and 57% of M+ participants achieved iTSSs of 15 or greater in ACC-I and ACC-II, respectively (Fig 1, E).Substantial data indicate that ssIgE levels to allergens might serve as biomarkers for symptom severity.10Ciprandi G. Tosca M.A. Silvestri M. The practical role of serum allergen-specific IgE as potential biomarker for predicting responder to allergen immunotherapy.Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2014; 10: 321-324Crossref PubMed Scopus (10) Google Scholar Accordingly, TSSs were greater in M+ participants with a detectable ssIgE level for D pteronyssinus in the ACC (Fig 2, A and B). The failure to detect such an association in the natural setting (Fig 2, A and B) might relate to variable HDM levels measured in dust from mattresses in the participants' homes (see Fig E4 and the Methods section in this article's Online Repository at www.jacionline.org).Fig 2Symptom responses in M+ participants stratified by ssIgE levels for D pteronyssinus and SPT responses to pollen. A, Mean ± SEM rTSSs or iTSSs in M+ participants according to detectable versus undetectable ssIgE levels (M+IgE− vs M+IgE+ participants). ‡Number of TSS measurements in each phase. B and C, Box-and-whisker plots for the maximum rTSS or iTSS in M+IgE− and M+IgE+ participants (Fig 2, B) and M+P− and M+P+ participants (Fig 2, C). P values test whether the means are different. D, Mean CD69+HLA-DR+CD8+ T cells for M+P− and M+P+ participants. Data for CD4+ T cells are shown in Fig E5. A linear generalized estimating equations model was used to test whether the mean across all 4 time points in ACC-I or ACC-II differed between M+P− and M+P+ participants. E-G, Box-and-whisker plots for ΔiTSS by ssIgE status and SPT reactivity to pollen (Fig 2, E) and differences in TSSs from scores recorded before exposures 1 and 5 from the TSSs the evening before the run-in and observation (Obs.) phases, respectively, in all (M+), M+P−, and M+P+ participants and daily ΔiTSSs in M+ participants during each exposure (Fig 2, G). ΔiTSS indicates the maximum iTSS minus the baseline iTSS at the corresponding exposure. NS, Not significant. #.05 < P value ≤ .15. *.01 < P value ≤ .05. **P ≤ .01.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)Pollen SPT reactivity (P+) stratified TSSs, with M+P+ participants having higher rTSSs and iTSSs when compared with those of M+P− participants (Fig 2, C). Levels of T-cell activation were greater in M+P+ participants compared with those seen in M+P− participants before and during ACCs (Fig 2, D, and see Fig E5 and the Methods section in this article's Online Repository at www.jacionline.org). Notably, T-cell activation has been associated with symptom responses during allergy.11Majori M. Piccoli M.L. Melej R. Pileggi V. Pesci A. Lymphocyte activation markers in peripheral blood before and after natural exposure to allergen in asthmatic patients.Respiration. 1997; 64: 45-49Crossref PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar Thus exposure to pollens in the months preceding the ACC exposures might have rendered M+P+ participants constitutively “primed,” serving as a basis for the higher T-cell activation and symptoms in the natural and ACC settings (Fig 2, C and D). In the ACC phases the effects of pollen sensitization and ssIgE status were additive, with M+IgE+P+ participants manifesting maximal responsiveness after HDM exposure (Fig 2, E). The trigger for the constitutive priming could be winter and spring tree pollens because all M+P+ participants were reactive based on SPT reactivity to tree pollens (see Table E2). Moreover, the extended tree pollination season, which terminated a few months before the start of the ACC exposures, is typically associated with intense symptoms.6Jacobs R.L. Harper N. He W. Andrews C.P. Rather C.G. Ramirez D.A. et al.Effect of confounding cofactors on responses to pollens during natural season versus pollen challenge chamber exposure.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014; 133 (e1-7): 1340-1346Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (21) Google ScholarAt the 2 transition points from the natural settings to the ACC (run-in → ACC-I and observation phase → ACC-II), there was a decrease in TSSs (Fig 1, Fig 2, A). This decrease was greater in those with more symptoms (ie, higher in M+P+ participants than in M+P− participants [Fig 2, F] and higher in M+IgE+ participants than in M+IgE− participants [data not shown]). This decrease might relate to (1) differences in how TSSs were recorded in the natural versus ACC settings (reflective vs instantaneous scoring, respectively); (2) learned responses secondary to increased emphasis/education by research staff in the ACC on how to accurately record TSSs; and (3) the controlled environment in the ACC (see the Discussion in this article's Online Repository).Inspection of the overall TSS trajectory indicated that after initiation of ACC exposures, there was a downward shift in the TSS (Fig 1, B). The baseline (pre-ACC) iTSS recorded before commencing challenge 1 was higher than the baseline iTSS recorded before challenges 2 and 3, and the baseline iTSS before challenges 4 through 8 were similar (Fig 1, B). Furthermore, the rTSS in the observation phase was lower than the rTSS in the run-in phase (Fig 1, B). This downward shift in baseline iTSS would give the mistaken impression that responsiveness was greater in challenges 2 and 3 and lower thereafter, when in fact the responsiveness in exposures 1 and 4 through 8 was similar (Fig 2, G). These downward shifts in TSSs did not differ by pollen SPT or ssIgE status (data not shown), and we surmise this might relate to a combination of factors: learned responses (secondary to education in the ACC) and partial clinical tolerance akin to what has been observed after repetitive exposure to allergens, including HDM (see the Discussion section in this article's Online Repository).12Woodfolk J.A. High-dose allergen exposure leads to tolerance.Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2005; 28: 43-58Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 13Liu L.Y. Swenson C.A. Kelly E.A. Kita H. Jarjour N.N. Busse W.W. Comparison of the effects of repetitive low-dose and single-dose antigen challenge on airway inflammation.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003; 111: 818-825Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (17) Google ScholarIn this study exposure to HDM concentrations used in the ACC was associated with reliable and reproducible elicitation of symptoms. SPT reactivity to pollen, which was associated with increased inflammatory status, and ssIgE levels to HDM were biological markers that correlated with symptom responses in the ACC. These 2 biomarkers stratified M+ participants as higher versus lower responders in the ACC, whereas this stratification is obscured in the natural settings. Therefore we suggest that out-of-pollination season challenges with HDM in the ACC might help mitigate the confounding of factors present in the natural setting: variable or low exposure to HDM, lack of association of ssIgE levels with rTSSs, and effects of competing environmental influences in a primed polysensitized subject.We also suggest that the other factors that could potentially confound clinical trials in an ACC (and natural setting) are nocebo7Bingel U. Avoiding nocebo effects to optimize treatment outcome.JAMA. 2014; 312: 693-694Crossref PubMed Scopus (125) Google Scholar and placebo14Enck P. Bingel U. Schedlowski M. Rief W. The placebo response in medicine: minimize, maximize or personalize?.Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013; 12: 191-204Crossref PubMed Scopus (422) Google Scholar effects (expectations, learning process, and participant-physician communication). Confounding could occur by (1) misattribution of positive therapy effects to decrease symptom scores related to more precise symptom scoring (because of learned behavior) and/or partial clinical tolerance (because of repetitive exposure) and (2) imbalance in the proportion of high versus low responders in the treatment versus placebo arms. An example that highlights the potential for this imbalance is the observation that the effectiveness of anti-IgE therapy for asthma differed by the overall sensitization status of the trial participants.15Busse W.W. Morgan W.J. Gergen P.J. Mitchell H.E. Gern J.E. Liu A.H. et al.Randomized trial of omalizumab (anti-IgE) for asthma in inner-city children.N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 1005-1015Crossref PubMed Scopus (669) Google Scholar Therapies might be more effective in patients with greater responsiveness to allergen exposure, a trait that can be readily identified in an ACC. Thus we surmise that mindfulness of the abovementioned confounders and use of an ACC might together facilitate detection of differences in the effects of placebo versus therapy in clinical trials, especially in exploratory studies with novel therapeutic agents when both the participant numbers and therapy effect sizes might be modest. The proceedings of a National Institutes of Health workshop and a meeting of an Advisory Committee of the US Food and Drug Administration,1U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research: Allergenic Products Advisory Committee, May 12, 2011. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/BloodVaccinesandOtherBiologics/AllergenicProductsAdvisoryCommittee/UCM258587.pdf. Accessed May 28, 2014.Google Scholar, 2Togias A. Asthma, Allergy, and Inflammation Branch, Division of Allergy, Immunology and Transplantation, NIAID/NIHEnvironmental exposure units: clinical trial design for validation. National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases/National Institutes of Health, Bethesda2010: 1-12Google Scholar as well as related commentaries,3Bernstein J.A. Correlation between a pollen challenge chamber and a natural allergen exposure study design for eliciting ocular and nasal symptoms: early evidence supporting a paradigm shift in drug investigation?.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012; 130: 128-129Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (16) Google Scholar, 4Devillier P. Le Gall M. Horak F. The allergen challenge chamber: a valuable tool for optimizing the clinical development of pollen immunotherapy.Allergy. 2011; 66: 163-169Crossref PubMed Scopus (46) Google Scholar highlight the utility of an allergen challenge chamber (ACC) for conducting clinical trials for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (AR). Mitigation of factors that might confound the design, analysis, and interpretation of these trials requires a systematic comparison of symptoms present in the natural setting versus those elicited after exposure to aeroallergens in an ACC. In prior studies we conducted out-of-season challenges with 3 separate pollens in patients with seasonal allergy.5Jacobs R.L. Harper N. He W. Andrews C.P. Rather C.G. Ramirez D.A. et al.Responses to ragweed pollen in a pollen challenge chamber versus seasonal exposure identify allergic rhinoconjunctivitis endotypes.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012; 130: 122-127.e8Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (46) Google Scholar, 6Jacobs R.L. Harper N. He W. Andrews C.P. Rather C.G. Ramirez D.A. et al.Effect of confounding cofactors on responses to pollens during natural season versus pollen challenge chamber exposure.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014; 133 (e1-7): 1340-1346Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar Although there was high correlation in symptom scores in the natural pollination seasons and ACC, competing environmental influences (eg, mold) in the natural setting blunted the responsiveness to these pollens, whereas this confounder was not present in the ACC.5Jacobs R.L. Harper N. He W. Andrews C.P. Rather C.G. Ramirez D.A. et al.Responses to ragweed pollen in a pollen challenge chamber versus seasonal exposure identify allergic rhinoconjunctivitis endotypes.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012; 130: 122-127.e8Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (46) Google Scholar, 6Jacobs R.L. Harper N. He W. Andrews C.P. Rather C.G. Ramirez D.A. et al.Effect of confounding cofactors on responses to pollens during natural season versus pollen challenge chamber exposure.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014; 133 (e1-7): 1340-1346Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar However, most patients with allergy are polysensitized to outdoor (eg, pollens) and indoor (eg, house dust mite [HDM]) aeroallergens. HDM exposure is common, associated with perennial allergy, and a significant risk factor for AR and asthma. Here we compared the symptom dynamics in the natural setting versus the ACC in HDM-sensitive (M+) and nonsensitive (M−) participants meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria shown in Table E1 in this article's Online Repository at www.jacionline.org. M− subjects lacked both a history of AR and skin prick test (SPT) wheal reactivity (≥5 mm) to 17 allergens, including HDM (see Table E2 in this article's Online Repository at www.jacionline.org). The study comprised 4 study phases: a 4-day run-in phase followed by 2 ACC exposure phases (ACC-I and ACC-II) with an intervening 38-day observation phase (Fig 1, A). This design allowed for evaluation of the reproducibility of symptom responses and factors that could potentially confound clinical trials in the ACC, including mediators of nocebo effects,7Bingel U. Avoiding nocebo effects to optimize treatment outcome.JAMA. 2014; 312: 693-694Crossref PubMed Scopus (125) Google Scholar as discussed in the Methods section in this article's Online Repository at www.jacionline.org. The study was conducted in the early fall, when only weed pollens were detected in San Antonio, Texas (Fig 1, A and B).6Jacobs R.L. Harper N. He W. Andrews C.P. Rather C.G. Ramirez D.A. et al.Effect of confounding cofactors on responses to pollens during natural season versus pollen challenge chamber exposure.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014; 133 (e1-7): 1340-1346Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar To mitigate this confounding factor, we selected M+ participants with negative SPT responses for weed pollens (see Table E2). All participants were allergy drug free throughout the study (see Table E3 in this article's Online Repository at www.jacionline.org). Each ACC phase comprised exposure for 3 hours on 4 consecutive days to a purified mite body powder of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Fig 1, A and B, and see the Methods section in this article's Online Repository). The end point we targeted was an increase in instantaneous total symptom scores (iTSSs) of at least 6 units in 50% of participants from baseline levels. To achieve this goal, the ACC was calibrated to deliver 70 to 110 ng/m3 HDM Der p 1 antigen, as measured by means of ELISA (see Table E4 and the Methods section in this article's Online Repository at www.jacionline.org). iTSSs in the ACC and reflective total symptom scores (rTSSs) in the natural setting were recorded by using a 5-point Likert scale (see Table E5 in this article's Online Repository at www.jacionline.org). Of the 40 participants meeting inclusion criteria, 35 (21 M+ and 14 M− participants) completed all 4 study phases, and of these, 13 M+ participants and 1 M− participant had detectable (≥0.35 kU/L) serum specific IgE (ssIgE) to D pteronyssinus. This dichotomy between SPT reactivity but undetectable ssIgE has been reported for many allergens (see the Discussion section in this article's Online Repository at www.jacionline.org).8de Vos G. Skin testing versus serum-specific IgE testing: which is better for diagnosing aeroallergen sensitization and predicting clinical allergy?.Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2014; 14: 430Crossref PubMed Scopus (48) Google Scholar There were no differences in the key demographic characteristics between M+ and M− participants (see Table E6 in this article's Online Repository at www.jacionline.org). Five participants withdrew from the study for nonmedical reasons. M− participants had minimal symptoms in the ACC (mean iTSS, <1; Fig 1, B). In contrast, M+ participants experienced a mean increase of 3 units in the iTSS within 30 minutes of HDM challenge, and iTSSs reached a plateau after approximately 120 minutes (Fig 1, B). There was a high degree of concordance in symptom responses in M+ participants in the ACC recorded by using the Likert and visual analog scales (see Fig E1 in this article's Online Repository at www.jacionline.org). Eleven episodes of bronchospasm occurred in 5 M+ participants, a rate consistent with prior findings.9Horak F. Toth J. Marks B. Stubner U.P. Berger U.E. Jager S. et al.Efficacy and safety relative to placebo of an oral formulation of cetirizine and sustained-release pseudoephedrine in the management of nasal congestion.Allergy. 1998; 53: 849-856Crossref PubMed Scopus (41) Google Scholar These participants exhibited slightly higher total symptom scores (TSSs; see Fig E2 in this article's Online Repository at www.jacionline.org), had greater than 15% improvement in FEV1.0 after treatment with nebulized albuterol, and returned to the ACC without additional exacerbations (see the Discussion section in this article's Online Repository). These findings suggest that M+ participants with mild intermittent asthma can be safely evaluated within ACCs. The concordance in symptom responses during and between ACC-I and ACC-II was high (Fig 1, C, and see Table E7 in this article's Online Repository at www.jacionline.org). In contrast, the correlations between rTSSs recorded in the run-in versus observation phases or between rTSSs versus iTSSs were much lower (see Fig E3 in this article's Online Repository at www.jacionline.org). During ACC-I and ACC-II, an increase in iTSSs of 6 or greater from baseline (pre-exposure) was experienced in greater than 55% of participants (Fig 1, D). While less than 10% of participants had iTSSs of 15 or greater at baseline, 67% and 57% of M+ participants achieved iTSSs of 15 or greater in ACC-I and ACC-II, respectively (Fig 1, E). Substantial data indicate that ssIgE levels to allergens might serve as biomarkers for symptom severity.10Ciprandi G. Tosca M.A. Silvestri M. The practical role of serum allergen-specific IgE as potential biomarker for predicting responder to allergen immunotherapy.Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2014; 10: 321-324Crossref PubMed Scopus (10) Google Scholar Accordingly, TSSs were greater in M+ participants with a detectable ssIgE level for D pteronyssinus in the ACC (Fig 2, A and B). The failure to detect such an association in the natural setting (Fig 2, A and B) might relate to variable HDM levels measured in dust from mattresses in the participants' homes (see Fig E4 and the Methods section in this article's Online Repository at www.jacionline.org). Pollen SPT reactivity (P+) stratified TSSs, with M+P+ participants having higher rTSSs and iTSSs when compared with those of M+P− participants (Fig 2, C). Levels of T-cell activation were greater in M+P+ participants compared with those seen in M+P− participants before and during ACCs (Fig 2, D, and see Fig E5 and the Methods section in this article's Online Repository at www.jacionline.org). Notably, T-cell activation has been associated with symptom responses during allergy.11Majori M. Piccoli M.L. Melej R. Pileggi V. Pesci A. Lymphocyte activation markers in peripheral blood before and after natural exposure to allergen in asthmatic patients.Respiration. 1997; 64: 45-49Crossref PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar Thus exposure to pollens in the months preceding the ACC exposures might have rendered M+P+ participants constitutively “primed,” serving as a basis for the higher T-cell activation and symptoms in the natural and ACC settings (Fig 2, C and D). In the ACC phases the effects of pollen sensitization and ssIgE status were additive, with M+IgE+P+ participants manifesting maximal responsiveness after HDM exposure (Fig 2, E). The trigger for the constitutive priming could be winter and spring tree pollens because all M+P+ participants were reactive based on SPT reactivity to tree pollens (see Table E2). Moreover, the extended tree pollination season, which terminated a few months before the start of the ACC exposures, is typically associated with intense symptoms.6Jacobs R.L. Harper N. He W. Andrews C.P. Rather C.G. Ramirez D.A. et al.Effect of confounding cofactors on responses to pollens during natural season versus pollen challenge chamber exposure.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014; 133 (e1-7): 1340-1346Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar At the 2 transition points from the natural settings to the ACC (run-in → ACC-I and observation phase → ACC-II), there was a decrease in TSSs (Fig 1, Fig 2, A). This decrease was greater in those with more symptoms (ie, higher in M+P+ participants than in M+P− participants [Fig 2, F] and higher in M+IgE+ participants than in M+IgE− participants [data not shown]). This decrease might relate to (1) differences in how TSSs were recorded in the natural versus ACC settings (reflective vs instantaneous scoring, respectively); (2) learned responses secondary to increased emphasis/education by research staff in the ACC on how to accurately record TSSs; and (3) the controlled environment in the ACC (see the Discussion in this article's Online Repository). Inspection of the overall TSS trajectory indicated that after initiation of ACC exposures, there was a downward shift in the TSS (Fig 1, B). The baseline (pre-ACC) iTSS recorded before commencing challenge 1 was higher than the baseline iTSS recorded before challenges 2 and 3, and the baseline iTSS before challenges 4 through 8 were similar (Fig 1, B). Furthermore, the rTSS in the observation phase was lower than the rTSS in the run-in phase (Fig 1, B). This downward shift in baseline iTSS would give the mistaken impression that responsiveness was greater in challenges 2 and 3 and lower thereafter, when in fact the responsiveness in exposures 1 and 4 through 8 was similar (Fig 2, G). These downward shifts in TSSs did not differ by pollen SPT or ssIgE status (data not shown), and we surmise this might relate to a combination of factors: learned responses (secondary to education in the ACC) and partial clinical tolerance akin to what has been observed after repetitive exposure to allergens, including HDM (see the Discussion section in this article's Online Repository).12Woodfolk J.A. High-dose allergen exposure leads to tolerance.Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2005; 28: 43-58Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 13Liu L.Y. Swenson C.A. Kelly E.A. Kita H. Jarjour N.N. Busse W.W. Comparison of the effects of repetitive low-dose and single-dose antigen challenge on airway inflammation.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003; 111: 818-825Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (17) Google Scholar In this study exposure to HDM concentrations used in the ACC was associated with reliable and reproducible elicitation of symptoms. SPT reactivity to pollen, which was associated with increased inflammatory status, and ssIgE levels to HDM were biological markers that correlated with symptom responses in the ACC. These 2 biomarkers stratified M+ participants as higher versus lower responders in the ACC, whereas this stratification is obscured in the natural settings. Therefore we suggest that out-of-pollination season challenges with HDM in the ACC might help mitigate the confounding of factors present in the natural setting: variable or low exposure to HDM, lack of association of ssIgE levels with rTSSs, and effects of competing environmental influences in a primed polysensitized subject. We also suggest that the other factors that could potentially confound clinical trials in an ACC (and natural setting) are nocebo7Bingel U. Avoiding nocebo effects to optimize treatment outcome.JAMA. 2014; 312: 693-694Crossref PubMed Scopus (125) Google Scholar and placebo14Enck P. Bingel U. Schedlowski M. Rief W. The placebo response in medicine: minimize, maximize or personalize?.Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013; 12: 191-204Crossref PubMed Scopus (422) Google Scholar effects (expectations, learning process, and participant-physician communication). Confounding could occur by (1) misattribution of positive therapy effects to decrease symptom scores related to more precise symptom scoring (because of learned behavior) and/or partial clinical tolerance (because of repetitive exposure) and (2) imbalance in the proportion of high versus low responders in the treatment versus placebo arms. An example that highlights the potential for this imbalance is the observation that the effectiveness of anti-IgE therapy for asthma differed by the overall sensitization status of the trial participants.15Busse W.W. Morgan W.J. Gergen P.J. Mitchell H.E. Gern J.E. Liu A.H. et al.Randomized trial of omalizumab (anti-IgE) for asthma in inner-city children.N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 1005-1015Crossref PubMed Scopus (669) Google Scholar Therapies might be more effective in patients with greater responsiveness to allergen exposure, a trait that can be readily identified in an ACC. Thus we surmise that mindfulness of the abovementioned confounders and use of an ACC might together facilitate detection of differences in the effects of placebo versus therapy in clinical trials, especially in exploratory studies with novel therapeutic agents when both the participant numbers and therapy effect sizes might be modest. Supplementary data Download .docx (.23 MB) Help with docx files Online Repository Data Download .pdf (.39 MB) Help with pdf files Fig E1 Download .pdf (.16 MB) Help with pdf files Fig E2 Download .pdf (.4 MB) Help with pdf files Fig E3 Download .pdf (.37 MB) Help with pdf files Fig E4 Download .pdf (.68 MB) Help with pdf files Fig E5 Download .docx (.23 MB) Help with docx files Online Repository Data Download .pdf (.39 MB) Help with pdf files Fig E1 Download .pdf (.16 MB) Help with pdf files Fig E2 Download .pdf (.4 MB) Help with pdf files Fig E3 Download .pdf (.37 MB) Help with pdf files Fig E4 Download .pdf (.68 MB) Help with pdf files Fig E5" @default.
W1987692548 created "2016-06-24" @default.
W1987692548 creator A5003580307 @default.
W1987692548 creator A5007316657 @default.
W1987692548 creator A5012294064 @default.
W1987692548 creator A5015413458 @default.
W1987692548 creator A5023706512 @default.
W1987692548 creator A5027798490 @default.
W1987692548 creator A5034831538 @default.
W1987692548 creator A5041694829 @default.
W1987692548 creator A5049182417 @default.
W1987692548 creator A5055183099 @default.
W1987692548 creator A5063485792 @default.
W1987692548 creator A5084933409 @default.
W1987692548 creator A5088465992 @default.
W1987692548 date "2015-04-01" @default.
W1987692548 modified "2023-10-07" @default.
W1987692548 title "Symptom dynamics during repeated serial allergen challenge chamber exposures to house dust mite" @default.
W1987692548 cites W1516952736 @default.
W1987692548 cites W1981243588 @default.
W1987692548 cites W1992781686 @default.
W1987692548 cites W2009522767 @default.
W1987692548 cites W2011400318 @default.
W1987692548 cites W2031199458 @default.
W1987692548 cites W2041234296 @default.
W1987692548 cites W2062838995 @default.
W1987692548 cites W2074875994 @default.
W1987692548 cites W2082263145 @default.
W1987692548 cites W2146696585 @default.
W1987692548 cites W2146852572 @default.
W1987692548 cites W2147424639 @default.
W1987692548 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2014.09.047" @default.
W1987692548 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25458003" @default.
W1987692548 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
W1987692548 type Work @default.
W1987692548 sameAs 1987692548 @default.
W1987692548 citedByCount "17" @default.
W1987692548 countsByYear W19876925482015 @default.
W1987692548 countsByYear W19876925482016 @default.
W1987692548 countsByYear W19876925482017 @default.
W1987692548 countsByYear W19876925482018 @default.
W1987692548 countsByYear W19876925482019 @default.
W1987692548 countsByYear W19876925482020 @default.
W1987692548 countsByYear W19876925482021 @default.
W1987692548 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
W1987692548 hasAuthorship W1987692548A5003580307 @default.
W1987692548 hasAuthorship W1987692548A5007316657 @default.
W1987692548 hasAuthorship W1987692548A5012294064 @default.
W1987692548 hasAuthorship W1987692548A5015413458 @default.
W1987692548 hasAuthorship W1987692548A5023706512 @default.
W1987692548 hasAuthorship W1987692548A5027798490 @default.
W1987692548 hasAuthorship W1987692548A5034831538 @default.
W1987692548 hasAuthorship W1987692548A5041694829 @default.
W1987692548 hasAuthorship W1987692548A5049182417 @default.
W1987692548 hasAuthorship W1987692548A5055183099 @default.
W1987692548 hasAuthorship W1987692548A5063485792 @default.
W1987692548 hasAuthorship W1987692548A5084933409 @default.
W1987692548 hasAuthorship W1987692548A5088465992 @default.
W1987692548 hasConcept C203014093 @default.
W1987692548 hasConcept C207480886 @default.
W1987692548 hasConcept C2778166374 @default.
W1987692548 hasConcept C2780510475 @default.
W1987692548 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
W1987692548 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
W1987692548 hasConceptScore W1987692548C203014093 @default.
W1987692548 hasConceptScore W1987692548C207480886 @default.
W1987692548 hasConceptScore W1987692548C2778166374 @default.
W1987692548 hasConceptScore W1987692548C2780510475 @default.
W1987692548 hasConceptScore W1987692548C39432304 @default.
W1987692548 hasConceptScore W1987692548C71924100 @default.
W1987692548 hasIssue "4" @default.
W1987692548 hasLocation W19876925481 @default.
W1987692548 hasOpenAccess W1987692548 @default.
W1987692548 hasPrimaryLocation W19876925481 @default.
W1987692548 hasRelatedWork W1508046341 @default.
W1987692548 hasRelatedWork W2009647534 @default.
W1987692548 hasRelatedWork W2027547758 @default.
W1987692548 hasRelatedWork W2034735991 @default.
W1987692548 hasRelatedWork W2082543043 @default.
W1987692548 hasRelatedWork W2083549041 @default.
W1987692548 hasRelatedWork W2166523195 @default.
W1987692548 hasRelatedWork W2514609206 @default.
W1987692548 hasRelatedWork W2761027626 @default.
W1987692548 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
W1987692548 hasVolume "135" @default.
W1987692548 isParatext "false" @default.
W1987692548 isRetracted "false" @default.
W1987692548 magId "1987692548" @default.
W1987692548 workType "article" @default.