Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1988542014> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 64 of
64
with 100 items per page.
- W1988542014 abstract "The United States is generally proud of its leadership role at the trials, making America's current rejection of the precedent they established seem paradoxical. This article approaches the Nuremberg Paradox by examining the French experience with the trials, and comparing France's adoption and internalization of international criminal law to that of its American cousin. The Article concludes that an important reason that the principles never took root in the United States stems from the different legal cultures and traditions of the two countries, particularly as regards the field of international criminal law. Examining the inter-war, post war and modern application of international criminal law in France and the United States, one is struck by the long-standing legal, philosophical and political differences exhibited by the two countries' approaches, and perhaps most starkly, the differences that appeared during the negotiation, adoption and ratification of the International Criminal Court Statute in 1998. Indeed, although the French Parliament was willing to ratify the ICC Statute and at the same time adopt a constitutional amendment abrogating the immunities and future amnesties granted to its own members and the President of the French Republic, U.S. opposition to the treaty has been consistent and, at times, overwhelming. In exploring these questions, the article surveys the interwar scholarship, the post-world war II prosecutions of Vichy collaborators and former Nazis in the Touvier, Barbie, and Papon cases, and France's more recent exercises of universal jurisdiction in the modern period of international criminal law. The implications of the French experience are analyzed in light of Harold Koh's transnational legal process theory, which captures the process by which France internalized the principles, but does not explain why that process took hold in France but not in the United States. The Article's central claim is that deeper historical, cultural and social factors that influenced French legal culture explain the differences between the two countries approaches. Indeed, an examination of the French precedent illuminates our understanding of how and why international criminal law remains only superficially and sporadically enforceable in the United States." @default.
- W1988542014 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1988542014 creator A5055296632 @default.
- W1988542014 date "2009-04-24" @default.
- W1988542014 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
- W1988542014 title "The Nuremberg Paradox" @default.
- W1988542014 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
- W1988542014 type Work @default.
- W1988542014 sameAs 1988542014 @default.
- W1988542014 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W1988542014 countsByYear W19885420142014 @default.
- W1988542014 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
- W1988542014 hasAuthorship W1988542014A5055296632 @default.
- W1988542014 hasConcept C17319257 @default.
- W1988542014 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W1988542014 hasConcept C193279874 @default.
- W1988542014 hasConcept C195064531 @default.
- W1988542014 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W1988542014 hasConcept C202565627 @default.
- W1988542014 hasConcept C2776243541 @default.
- W1988542014 hasConcept C2776713681 @default.
- W1988542014 hasConcept C2776949292 @default.
- W1988542014 hasConcept C2779010840 @default.
- W1988542014 hasConcept C2780668109 @default.
- W1988542014 hasConcept C55447825 @default.
- W1988542014 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W1988542014 hasConceptScore W1988542014C17319257 @default.
- W1988542014 hasConceptScore W1988542014C17744445 @default.
- W1988542014 hasConceptScore W1988542014C193279874 @default.
- W1988542014 hasConceptScore W1988542014C195064531 @default.
- W1988542014 hasConceptScore W1988542014C199539241 @default.
- W1988542014 hasConceptScore W1988542014C202565627 @default.
- W1988542014 hasConceptScore W1988542014C2776243541 @default.
- W1988542014 hasConceptScore W1988542014C2776713681 @default.
- W1988542014 hasConceptScore W1988542014C2776949292 @default.
- W1988542014 hasConceptScore W1988542014C2779010840 @default.
- W1988542014 hasConceptScore W1988542014C2780668109 @default.
- W1988542014 hasConceptScore W1988542014C55447825 @default.
- W1988542014 hasConceptScore W1988542014C94625758 @default.
- W1988542014 hasOpenAccess W1988542014 @default.
- W1988542014 hasRelatedWork W1517781633 @default.
- W1988542014 hasRelatedWork W1525888862 @default.
- W1988542014 hasRelatedWork W1527125995 @default.
- W1988542014 hasRelatedWork W1538171740 @default.
- W1988542014 hasRelatedWork W2015184584 @default.
- W1988542014 hasRelatedWork W2044686297 @default.
- W1988542014 hasRelatedWork W2119107535 @default.
- W1988542014 hasRelatedWork W2139514889 @default.
- W1988542014 hasRelatedWork W2158598674 @default.
- W1988542014 hasRelatedWork W2168027974 @default.
- W1988542014 hasRelatedWork W2489053734 @default.
- W1988542014 hasRelatedWork W2579848629 @default.
- W1988542014 hasRelatedWork W2911909848 @default.
- W1988542014 hasRelatedWork W3092697904 @default.
- W1988542014 hasRelatedWork W3123062052 @default.
- W1988542014 hasRelatedWork W3123745434 @default.
- W1988542014 hasRelatedWork W3125222459 @default.
- W1988542014 hasRelatedWork W627989526 @default.
- W1988542014 hasRelatedWork W287205635 @default.
- W1988542014 hasRelatedWork W3111914243 @default.
- W1988542014 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1988542014 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1988542014 magId "1988542014" @default.
- W1988542014 workType "article" @default.