FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1988681204> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1988681204 endingPage "268" @default.
• W1988681204 startingPage "260" @default.
• W1988681204 abstract "Grain yield and quality of winter wheat (Triticum durum L.) are affected by several factors, and crop management has a very important role among them. A 3-year (from 2003–04 to 2005–06) field experiment under irrigation was carried out at Diyabakir in the South East Anatolia Region of Turkey to evaluate immediate effects of tillage and residue management systems after cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) on grain yield and quality [thousand grain weight (TGW), test weight (TW), protein content (PC) and mini sedimentation (mini SDS)] of durum wheat, and correlations among these parameters. A split plot design with three replications was used, in which two residue management treatments [collecting and removing cotton stalks from plots (SRem), and chopping and leaving of cotton stalks in plots (SLev)] were main plots, and six tillage and/or wheat planting method combination treatments [moldboard plough + cultivator + broadcast seeding + cultivator as conventional tillage-I (CT-I), moldboard plough + cultivator + drill as conventional tillage-II (CT-II), chisel plough + cultivator + drill as vertical tillage (VT), two passes of disk harrow + drill as reduced tillage-I (RT-I), rotary tiller + drill as reduced tillage-II (RT-II), and no-till ridge planting (RP)] were sub-plots. The effect of cotton residue management on grain yield, TW, PC, mini SDS was not significant, but SRem (51.21 g) gave significantly higher TGW than SLev (50.63 g). Tillage and/or wheat planting method combination treatments had a significant effect on grain yield, TGW and TW, but did not significantly influence PC and mini SDS. Conventional tillage with broadcast seeding (CT-I) treatment produced the lowest wheat grain yield (5.395 Mg ha−1), while there were no significant differences in grain yield among the other five tillage treatments (yields ranged from 5.671 to 5.819 Mg ha−1). In spite of supplemental irrigations, the variability of weather conditions, particularly the amount and distribution of rainfall during the growing season, had a significant influence on wheat grain yield and quality parameters (TGW, TW, PC, mini SDS). Grain yield had a significant positive correlation with TGW, but it did not show any relationship with other grain quality parameters. In conclusion, the findings suggest that conventional tillage with broadcast seeding would be less effective in producing grain yield of wheat compared to other five tillage treatments with row planting, while management of the previous cotton stalks may not have any effect on yield and quality of wheat except TGW." @default.
• W1988681204 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1988681204 creator A5023611737 @default.
• W1988681204 creator A5028179008 @default.
• W1988681204 creator A5054234331 @default.
• W1988681204 date "2010-11-01" @default.
• W1988681204 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W1988681204 title "Short-term effects of tillage and residue management following cotton on grain yield and quality of wheat" @default.
• W1988681204 cites W1655899725 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W1964784998 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W1965822557 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W1970697174 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W1978519082 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W1979629928 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W1986492062 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W1988551827 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W1997371429 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2008937970 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2009645169 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2013151759 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2017030462 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2031932777 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2046254007 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2048022343 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2050009543 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2050870747 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2059114304 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2063464777 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2071005062 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2072183408 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2083537406 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2084565581 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2085685583 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2088979042 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2099786869 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2101996343 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2105718554 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2114766143 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2125345452 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2132874022 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2143351318 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2146730048 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2146881836 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2147173519 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2152366016 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2154592177 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2163519213 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W2169564221 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W3146164156 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W4246481826 @default.
• W1988681204 cites W4247030558 @default.
• W1988681204 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.07.016" @default.
• W1988681204 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W1988681204 type Work @default.
• W1988681204 sameAs 1988681204 @default.
• W1988681204 citedByCount "56" @default.
• W1988681204 countsByYear W19886812042012 @default.
• W1988681204 countsByYear W19886812042013 @default.
• W1988681204 countsByYear W19886812042014 @default.
• W1988681204 countsByYear W19886812042015 @default.
• W1988681204 countsByYear W19886812042016 @default.
• W1988681204 countsByYear W19886812042017 @default.
• W1988681204 countsByYear W19886812042018 @default.
• W1988681204 countsByYear W19886812042019 @default.
• W1988681204 countsByYear W19886812042020 @default.
• W1988681204 countsByYear W19886812042021 @default.
• W1988681204 countsByYear W19886812042022 @default.
• W1988681204 countsByYear W19886812042023 @default.
• W1988681204 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1988681204 hasAuthorship W1988681204A5023611737 @default.
• W1988681204 hasAuthorship W1988681204A5028179008 @default.
• W1988681204 hasAuthorship W1988681204A5054234331 @default.
• W1988681204 hasConcept C16397148 @default.
• W1988681204 hasConcept C168741863 @default.
• W1988681204 hasConcept C180429540 @default.
• W1988681204 hasConcept C2776560457 @default.
• W1988681204 hasConcept C2779656465 @default.
• W1988681204 hasConcept C2780920634 @default.
• W1988681204 hasConcept C2992211155 @default.
• W1988681204 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1988681204 hasConcept C6557445 @default.
• W1988681204 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1988681204 hasConceptScore W1988681204C16397148 @default.
• W1988681204 hasConceptScore W1988681204C168741863 @default.
• W1988681204 hasConceptScore W1988681204C180429540 @default.
• W1988681204 hasConceptScore W1988681204C2776560457 @default.
• W1988681204 hasConceptScore W1988681204C2779656465 @default.
• W1988681204 hasConceptScore W1988681204C2780920634 @default.
• W1988681204 hasConceptScore W1988681204C2992211155 @default.
• W1988681204 hasConceptScore W1988681204C33923547 @default.
• W1988681204 hasConceptScore W1988681204C6557445 @default.
• W1988681204 hasConceptScore W1988681204C86803240 @default.
• W1988681204 hasIssue "2-3" @default.
• W1988681204 hasLocation W19886812041 @default.
• W1988681204 hasOpenAccess W1988681204 @default.
• W1988681204 hasPrimaryLocation W19886812041 @default.
• W1988681204 hasRelatedWork W1988681204 @default.
• W1988681204 hasRelatedWork W2034460124 @default.

• next