FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1988926439> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1988926439 endingPage "310" @default.
• W1988926439 startingPage "305" @default.
• W1988926439 abstract "Abstract Study Objective. To compare costs of laparoscopic hysterectomy with those of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomies in a community hospital. Design. Retrospective review. Study cases were controlled for severity of pathology and extent of surgery performed laparoscopically. Charges were corrected for inflation. Setting. Rural community hospital, fee for service practice. Participants. Women undergoing hysterectomy during the study period. Interventions. Hysterectomy performed with or without laparoscopy. Measurements and Main Results. Operating times, operating room charges, total hospital charges, uterine weight, length of hospital stay, and complications were tabulated for laparoscopic, abdominal, and vaginal hysterectomies, with and without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. The use of a video monitor and disposable instruments was associated with increased costs and longer operating times. With reusable instruments and a simple operating technique performed while looking down an operating laparoscope, laparoscopic hysterectomy was less costly than abdominal hysterectomy. Laparoscopy without treatment of concurrent pathology before vaginal hysterectomy was associated with increased costs. Vaginal hysterectomy was faster and less expensive than any other form of hysterectomy. Some abdominal hysterectomies could possibly have been performed vaginally. There was no advantage in studying patients undergoing hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy separately from those undergoing hysterectomy alone. Complications were similar in all groups. Conclusions. Laparoscopic hysterectomy performed with a simple electrosurgical technique and reusable instruments, and without a video monitor was less expensive than abdominal hysterectomy. The video control and disposable instruments were associated with longer operating times and higher charges." @default.
• W1988926439 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1988926439 creator A5085145363 @default.
• W1988926439 date "1995-05-01" @default.
• W1988926439 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W1988926439 title "Laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy in a community hospital" @default.
• W1988926439 cites W1860600241 @default.
• W1988926439 cites W19387302 @default.
• W1988926439 cites W2006608377 @default.
• W1988926439 cites W2012989716 @default.
• W1988926439 cites W2014524881 @default.
• W1988926439 cites W2019770347 @default.
• W1988926439 cites W2025393205 @default.
• W1988926439 cites W2064772912 @default.
• W1988926439 cites W2070080301 @default.
• W1988926439 cites W2083277694 @default.
• W1988926439 cites W2112851613 @default.
• W1988926439 cites W2346704459 @default.
• W1988926439 cites W2403635289 @default.
• W1988926439 cites W2412307479 @default.
• W1988926439 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s1074-3804(05)80113-6" @default.
• W1988926439 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9050574" @default.
• W1988926439 hasPublicationYear "1995" @default.
• W1988926439 type Work @default.
• W1988926439 sameAs 1988926439 @default.
• W1988926439 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W1988926439 countsByYear W19889264392013 @default.
• W1988926439 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1988926439 hasAuthorship W1988926439A5085145363 @default.
• W1988926439 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1988926439 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W1988926439 hasConcept C2777696064 @default.
• W1988926439 hasConcept C2779494336 @default.
• W1988926439 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
• W1988926439 hasConcept C3017593049 @default.
• W1988926439 hasConcept C3019467916 @default.
• W1988926439 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W1988926439 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1988926439 hasConceptScore W1988926439C141071460 @default.
• W1988926439 hasConceptScore W1988926439C167135981 @default.
• W1988926439 hasConceptScore W1988926439C2777696064 @default.
• W1988926439 hasConceptScore W1988926439C2779494336 @default.
• W1988926439 hasConceptScore W1988926439C2780047204 @default.
• W1988926439 hasConceptScore W1988926439C3017593049 @default.
• W1988926439 hasConceptScore W1988926439C3019467916 @default.
• W1988926439 hasConceptScore W1988926439C61434518 @default.
• W1988926439 hasConceptScore W1988926439C71924100 @default.
• W1988926439 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W1988926439 hasLocation W19889264391 @default.
• W1988926439 hasLocation W19889264392 @default.
• W1988926439 hasOpenAccess W1988926439 @default.
• W1988926439 hasPrimaryLocation W19889264391 @default.
• W1988926439 hasRelatedWork W2009442898 @default.
• W1988926439 hasRelatedWork W2078894365 @default.
• W1988926439 hasRelatedWork W2086008795 @default.
• W1988926439 hasRelatedWork W2168281342 @default.
• W1988926439 hasRelatedWork W2389344979 @default.
• W1988926439 hasRelatedWork W2403942617 @default.
• W1988926439 hasRelatedWork W2437529422 @default.
• W1988926439 hasRelatedWork W2564759100 @default.
• W1988926439 hasRelatedWork W4206240123 @default.
• W1988926439 hasRelatedWork W4302346410 @default.
• W1988926439 hasVolume "2" @default.
• W1988926439 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1988926439 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1988926439 magId "1988926439" @default.
• W1988926439 workType "article" @default.