Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1989069969> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 70 of
70
with 100 items per page.
- W1989069969 endingPage "508" @default.
- W1989069969 startingPage "489" @default.
- W1989069969 abstract "The vagueness and uncertainty of application of the principles used to determine child custody appeals continue to cause great problems for the legal practitioner who must advise a client aggrieved by a decision at first instance. Child custody is an area where the right of appeal is unrestricted, but appeal court judges have nonetheless shown a marked tendency towards self-restraint in the exercise of their appellate jurisdiction. Two principal reasons are commonly given for this: first, the trial court in a child custody dispute often has a special advantage not possessed by the appeal court, in that it has seen and heard the witnesses; secondly, and more generally, the determination of a child custody dispute involves an exercise of discretion on the part of the trial court, in which the paramount consideration is the welfare of the child. For these reasons, which are considered in detail in the following section, it is perceived to be necessary to allow trial courts a degree of latitude. However, although the necessity for appellate self-restraint is generally accepted, there has been and continues to be wide disagreement as to the form which that self-restraint should take. In addition, there are many reported cases in which an appeal court has acknowledged the need for self-restraint, only to succumb to the temptation to intervene on the facts before it. The result of the absence of a principled justification for intervention is that there is no rational basis upon which parties can assess the strengths of their respective positions." @default.
- W1989069969 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1989069969 creator A5052769969 @default.
- W1989069969 creator A5060218865 @default.
- W1989069969 date "1987-11-01" @default.
- W1989069969 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
- W1989069969 title "Child Custody Appeals: The Search for Principle" @default.
- W1989069969 doi "https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197300117489" @default.
- W1989069969 hasPublicationYear "1987" @default.
- W1989069969 type Work @default.
- W1989069969 sameAs 1989069969 @default.
- W1989069969 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W1989069969 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1989069969 hasAuthorship W1989069969A5052769969 @default.
- W1989069969 hasAuthorship W1989069969A5060218865 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConcept C144559511 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConcept C2776825360 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConcept C2776949292 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConcept C2777632292 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConcept C2778428080 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConcept C2778449503 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConcept C2779271205 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConcept C28160582 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConcept C58166 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConceptScore W1989069969C111919701 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConceptScore W1989069969C138885662 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConceptScore W1989069969C144559511 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConceptScore W1989069969C15744967 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConceptScore W1989069969C17744445 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConceptScore W1989069969C199539241 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConceptScore W1989069969C2776825360 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConceptScore W1989069969C2776949292 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConceptScore W1989069969C2777632292 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConceptScore W1989069969C2778428080 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConceptScore W1989069969C2778449503 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConceptScore W1989069969C2779271205 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConceptScore W1989069969C28160582 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConceptScore W1989069969C41008148 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConceptScore W1989069969C41895202 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConceptScore W1989069969C58166 @default.
- W1989069969 hasConceptScore W1989069969C77805123 @default.
- W1989069969 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W1989069969 hasLocation W19890699691 @default.
- W1989069969 hasOpenAccess W1989069969 @default.
- W1989069969 hasPrimaryLocation W19890699691 @default.
- W1989069969 hasRelatedWork W1989069969 @default.
- W1989069969 hasRelatedWork W2043391115 @default.
- W1989069969 hasRelatedWork W2535205682 @default.
- W1989069969 hasRelatedWork W2953277577 @default.
- W1989069969 hasRelatedWork W3015079199 @default.
- W1989069969 hasRelatedWork W3043642101 @default.
- W1989069969 hasRelatedWork W3081592937 @default.
- W1989069969 hasRelatedWork W3140587564 @default.
- W1989069969 hasRelatedWork W3186902150 @default.
- W1989069969 hasRelatedWork W4231577589 @default.
- W1989069969 hasVolume "46" @default.
- W1989069969 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1989069969 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1989069969 magId "1989069969" @default.
- W1989069969 workType "article" @default.