FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1989191904> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1989191904 endingPage "2593" @default.
• W1989191904 startingPage "2589" @default.
• W1989191904 abstract "Cytochrome b562 is not cleaved by the tail-specific protease Tsp in vitro or in the periplasm of Escherichia coli but becomes a good substrate when the C-terminal sequence WVAAA is added. Following randomization of the final three residue positions of this substrate, 54 different mutants with single residue substitutions were recovered. The steady-state expression levels of cytochrome variants bearing these mutant tails were similar in an E. coli strain deleted for the tsp gene but differed markedly in a strain containing Tsp. Wild-type cytochrome b562 and seven variants, displaying a range of intracellular expression levels, were purified. These proteins were found to have the same Tm values in thermal denaturation experiments but to be cleaved by Tsp at rates differing by as much as 30-fold. Overall, the rates of Tsp cleavage of these proteins in vitro correlate with their rates of cleavage in vivo as determined by pulse-chase experiments. These results indicate that the C-terminal sequence of the cytochrome-b562 variants is important in determining their proteolytic fate in the cell and show that this degradation is mediated predominantly by Tsp. There are different selectivity rules at each of the three C-terminal positions. The identity of the C-terminal residue of the substrate, where small, uncharged residues (Ala, Cys, Ser, Thr, Val) are preferred, is most important in determining the rate of substrate cleavage by Tsp. Non-polar residues are also preferred at the second and third positions, but larger and more hydrophobic side chains are also acceptable at these positions in good substrates. Cytochrome b562 is not cleaved by the tail-specific protease Tsp in vitro or in the periplasm of Escherichia coli but becomes a good substrate when the C-terminal sequence WVAAA is added. Following randomization of the final three residue positions of this substrate, 54 different mutants with single residue substitutions were recovered. The steady-state expression levels of cytochrome variants bearing these mutant tails were similar in an E. coli strain deleted for the tsp gene but differed markedly in a strain containing Tsp. Wild-type cytochrome b562 and seven variants, displaying a range of intracellular expression levels, were purified. These proteins were found to have the same Tm values in thermal denaturation experiments but to be cleaved by Tsp at rates differing by as much as 30-fold. Overall, the rates of Tsp cleavage of these proteins in vitro correlate with their rates of cleavage in vivo as determined by pulse-chase experiments. These results indicate that the C-terminal sequence of the cytochrome-b562 variants is important in determining their proteolytic fate in the cell and show that this degradation is mediated predominantly by Tsp. There are different selectivity rules at each of the three C-terminal positions. The identity of the C-terminal residue of the substrate, where small, uncharged residues (Ala, Cys, Ser, Thr, Val) are preferred, is most important in determining the rate of substrate cleavage by Tsp. Non-polar residues are also preferred at the second and third positions, but larger and more hydrophobic side chains are also acceptable at these positions in good substrates. INTRODUCTIONThe observed selectivity of intracellular proteolysis implies the existence of mechanisms that allow proteases to discriminate between correct and incorrect protein substrates(1.Gottesman S. Maurizi M.R. Microbiol. Rev. 1992; 56: 592-621Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 2.Goldberg A.L. St. John A.C. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1976; 45: 747-803Crossref PubMed Scopus (807) Google Scholar). Some substrate recognition may be possible at the level of exposure of appropriate cleavage sites. For example, a protease might cleave almost any unfolded or partially folded protein in which peptide bonds flanked by the proper P1 and P1′ residues are accessible. This type of mechanism may serve to rid the cell of misfolded or unfolded proteins but is unlikely to allow significant selectivity unless the local sequence determinants of cleavage site selection occur only rarely. Some protein substrates may be marked for degradation by covalent modification with molecular tags, which then serve as recognition determinants in subsequent steps. The ubiquitin-proteasome system of eukaryotic cells is currently the best understood example of this type, although the determinants that cause particular proteins to be modified by ubiquitin are still not well understood(3.Ciechanover A. Cell. 1994; 79: 13-21Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1588) Google Scholar). In bacteria, there are systems in which the identity of sequences at the C-terminal or N-terminal ends of proteins appear to serve as determinants of proteolytic degradation (4.Bowie J.U. Sauer R.T. J. Biol. Chem. 1989; 264: 7596-7602Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 5.Parsell D.A. Silber K.R. Sauer R.T. Genes & Dev. 1990; 4: 277-286Crossref PubMed Scopus (96) Google Scholar, 6.Tobias J.W. Shrader T.E. Rocap G. Varshavsky A. Science. 1991; 254: 1374-1377Crossref PubMed Scopus (418) Google Scholar). In these cases, such sequences may serve as secondary binding sites, which allow a protease to tether a substrate while waiting for rare unfolding events that expose the sites of primary cleavage.Specific degradation of proteins with non-polar C-terminal sequences was first reported for several cytoplasmic proteins in Escherichia coli(4.Bowie J.U. Sauer R.T. J. Biol. Chem. 1989; 264: 7596-7602Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 5.Parsell D.A. Silber K.R. Sauer R.T. Genes & Dev. 1990; 4: 277-286Crossref PubMed Scopus (96) Google Scholar), but the protease that mediates this degradation has not been identified. Tsp (tail-specific protease) is a periplasmic protease of E. coli that was purified based on its ability to differentially degrade two protein substrates that differed only in their C-terminal residues(7.Silber K.R. Keiler K.C. Sauer R.T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992; 89: 295-299Crossref PubMed Scopus (160) Google Scholar). The protein substrate cleaved by Tsp had a relatively apolar C-terminal sequence (WVAAA), while the protein resistant to Tsp cleavage had a relatively polar C-terminal sequence (RSEYE). Although this specificity in vitro is similar to that observed in vivo for cytoplasmic degradation(5.Parsell D.A. Silber K.R. Sauer R.T. Genes & Dev. 1990; 4: 277-286Crossref PubMed Scopus (96) Google Scholar), gene knockout experiments have shown that Tsp is not involved in cytoplasmic degradation(8.Silber K.R. Sauer R.T. Mol. & Gen. Genet. 1994; 242: 237-240Crossref PubMed Scopus (34) Google Scholar). Experiments in vitro have established that Tsp is an endoprotease that cleaves substrates at discrete sites throughout the polypeptide chain in a reaction that depends upon the identity of the substrate's C-terminal sequence and requires the presence of a free α-carboxyl group(9.Keiler K.C. Silber K.R. Downard K.M. Biemann K. Sauer R.T. Prot. Sci. 1995; 4: 1507-1515Crossref PubMed Scopus (55) Google Scholar). The precise determinants that allow some C-terminal sequences but not others to be recognized by Tsp are currently unknown. Moreover, it has not yet been established that C-terminal-specific degradation of substrates by Tsp occurs in the cell. In this paper, we address these issues by studying the susceptibility of cytochrome-b562 variants to Tsp-mediated proteolysis in vivo and in vitro. Cytochrome b562 is a periplasmic protein that can be readily detected in cell lysates because binding of the protein to heme gives rise to a characteristic red absorbance spectrum(10.Itagaki E. Hager L.P. J. Biol. Chem. 1966; 241: 3687-3695Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). We show that wild-type cytochrome b562 is resistant to Tsp-mediated cleavage but becomes a good substrate when a WVAAA C-terminal tail is added. To investigate sequence preferences at the C terminus, we constructed libraries of cytochrome b562-WVAAA, with each of the last three tail positions randomized individually, and assayed for steady-state levels of the modified variants in cells containing Tsp or deleted for Tsp. These results reveal different preferences at each of the three C-terminal positions and show that Tsp is the major periplasmic protease responsible for C-terminal-specific degradation of these substrates.EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURESStrains, Plasmids, and MutagenesisE. coli strain X90 is ara Δ(lac pro) gyrA argE(Am) Rif-thi-1/F′ lacIqlac+pro+; E. coli strain KS1000 is X90 Δtsp(prc)3::kan eda-51::Tn10(8.Silber K.R. Sauer R.T. Mol. & Gen. Genet. 1994; 242: 237-240Crossref PubMed Scopus (34) Google Scholar). Plasmid pKK101 is a pBluescript-derived vector that encodes ampicillin resistance and the Tsp-His6 protease under control of a lac-promoter(9.Keiler K.C. Silber K.R. Downard K.M. Biemann K. Sauer R.T. Prot. Sci. 1995; 4: 1507-1515Crossref PubMed Scopus (55) Google Scholar). Plasmid pRW-1 (a gift from Michael Hecht) is a pEMBL-18 derived plasmid that encodes ampicillin resistance and the cytochrome-b562 gene under transcriptional control of a lac promoter(11.Brunet A.P. Huang E.S. Huffine M.E. Loeb J.E. Weltman R.J. Hecht M.H. Nature. 1993; 364: 355-358Crossref PubMed Scopus (102) Google Scholar).A plasmid (pCyb2) encoding a variant of cytochrome b562 with the C-terminal tail sequence WVAAA was constructed by ligating the PstI-BamHI backbone fragment from pRW-1 (the PstI site is near the 3′-end of the cytochrome-b562 gene; the BamHI site is roughly 150 base pairs downstream) with a double-stranded oligonucleotide cassette encoding the 3′-end of the gene, codons for the WVAAA sequence, and the wild-type stop codon and termination sequences. The structure of pCyb2 was confirmed by restriction mapping and DNA sequencing. To randomize the C-terminal codons of the cytochrome-b562-WVAAA gene, the pCyb2 construction was repeated using an oligonucleotide cassette containing an equimolar mixture of G, A, T, and C at the appropriate codon. These libraries were transformed into X90 cells, single colonies were isolated, and the C-terminal sequences of genes from 60-75 independent candidates were determined by DNA sequencing.Protein PurificationWild-type Tsp with a six-histidine tag was purified from E. coli strain KS1000/pKK101 using nickel-chelate chromatography and ion-exchange chromatography as described(9.Keiler K.C. Silber K.R. Downard K.M. Biemann K. Sauer R.T. Prot. Sci. 1995; 4: 1507-1515Crossref PubMed Scopus (55) Google Scholar). Cytochrome b562 was purified from E. coli strain KS1000/pRW-1 using a protocol adapted from Ames et al.(12.Ames G.F.-L. Prody C. Kustu S. J. Bacteriol. 1984; 160: 1181-1183Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). Cells were grown at 37°C with gentle shaking for 12 h in 1 liter of 2X-YT broth supplemented with 150 μg/ml ampicillin and 1 mM isopropyl-1-thio-β-D-galactopyranoside and were harvested by centrifugation. The cell pellet was resuspended in 10 ml of chloroform, incubated at room temperature for 15 min, and 100 ml of 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) was added. This mixture was centrifuged for 20 min at 4,000 rpm, and the red aqueous supernatant containing cytochrome b562 and other periplasmic proteins was recovered. 10 ml of a 0.5 M potassium citrate (pH 4.0) buffer was added, and the pH was brought to 4.0 by addition of 1 M HCl. After stirring for 30 min at 4°C, precipitated proteins were removed by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 30 min. The supernatant was loaded onto a Mono S column (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.) equilibrated in 25 mM potassium citrate (pH 4.0), and the column was developed with a linear gradient from 0 to 300 mM KCl in the same buffer. Fractions containing cytochrome b562, which eluted between 75 and 100 mM KCl, were pooled, concentrated, and chromatographed on a Superose 12 column (Pharmacia) in buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.1 mM EDTA. Fractions that contained cytochrome b562 at greater than 95% purity, as assayed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, were pooled. Variant cytochrome-b562 proteins were purified in the same manner as the wild type.Expression AssaysThe steady-state levels of cytochrome-b562 variants in E. coli strain X90 (which has a chromosomal copy of the tsp gene) or strain KS1000 (which is deleted for the tsp gene) were determined following 12 h growth at 37°C after inoculating 50 μl of an overnight culture into 5 ml of 2X-YT broth supplemented with 150 μg/ml ampicillin, 1 mM isopropyl-1-thio-β-D-galactopyranoside, and 10 μg/ml FeCl2. Cells were harvested by centrifugation, and the cell pellets were frozen in an ethanol/dry ice bath for 15 min and thawed in a 4°C water bath for 15 min. This freeze-thaw protocol releases cytochrome b562(11.Brunet A.P. Huang E.S. Huffine M.E. Loeb J.E. Weltman R.J. Hecht M.H. Nature. 1993; 364: 355-358Crossref PubMed Scopus (102) Google Scholar). After 3 freeze-thaw cycles, the cell pellets were resuspended in 1 ml of water and incubated on ice for 30 min, and the cells were removed by centrifugation at 4°C. The supernatants were recovered, and the absorbance spectra from 220 to 450 nm were recorded. Assays from three independent cell cultures were performed for each cytochrome-b562 variant, and the absorbance values at 426 nm (the absorbance maximum for cytochrome b562 with a reduced heme group) were averaged.Pulse-Chase AssaysThe half-lives of cytochrome-b562 variants in vivo were determined by growing cells to mid-log phase in M9 minimal medium containing no Cys or Met and inducing protein expression by addition of 1 mM isopropyl-1-thio-β-D-galactopyranoside. 20 min after induction, a labeling pulse of 100 μCi of [35S]methionine was added, and 30 s later a chase of unlabeled L-methionine was added to a final concentration of 1.4 mg/ml. At different times, 0.5-ml aliquots were removed, immediately frozen in an ethanol-dry ice bath, and lysed by 3 cycles of thawing at 4°C followed by refreezing. Samples were electrophoresed on SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and the radiolabeled bands were visualized by phosphorimaging. Half-lives were determined by fitting the pulse-chase data to an exponential decay. For these calculations, the intensities of the induced bands were integrated using the phosphorimager ImageQuaNT software and were normalized to the intensities of a set of stable bands.Cleavage AssaysThe cleavage of cytochrome-b562 variants by Tsp in vitro was monitored by the change in heme absorbance, which accompanies its dissociation from the cleaved protein. For this assay, 2.5 μM of the purified cytochrome-b562 variant was incubated at 22°C with 0.3 μM Tsp-His6 in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 20 mM NaCl, and the loss of absorbance at 418 nm was monitored (418 nm is the absorbance maximum for the protein with an oxidized heme group; oxidation of the heme in the purified protein occurs spontaneously but does not alter the structure or stability of cytochrome b562). As a control, aliquots were removed from the cuvette at various time points and assayed for cleavage of cytochrome b562 by SDS gel electrophoresis. As expected, loss of absorbance at 418 nm was found to correlate with loss of the intact cytochrome-b562 band.Stability of Cytochrome-b562 VariantsThe circular dichroism spectra of cytochrome-b562 variants were measured using 25 μg/ml protein in buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.1 mM EDTA. Thermal melts were performed using the same protein concentration and buffer composition by monitoring the ellipticity at 222 nm as a function of temperature. Melting curves were fit to a two-state transition between native and denatured protein by non-linear least squares fitting using the program NONLIN for Macintosh(13.Brenstein R.J. NONLIN for Macintosh. Robelko Software, Carbondale, IL1989Google Scholar, 14.Johnson M.L. Frazier S. Methods Enzymol. 1985; 117: 301-342Crossref Scopus (508) Google Scholar).RESULTSWild-type cytochrome b562 is not cleaved by Tsp in vitro (Fig. 1A) and is expressed at comparable levels in tsp+ and tsp- cells as determined by heme absorbance (Fig. 1B). Neither finding is surprising. The Tsp protease is thought to prefer non-polar tails that are accessible in the folded protein(7.Silber K.R. Keiler K.C. Sauer R.T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992; 89: 295-299Crossref PubMed Scopus (160) Google Scholar, 9.Keiler K.C. Silber K.R. Downard K.M. Biemann K. Sauer R.T. Prot. Sci. 1995; 4: 1507-1515Crossref PubMed Scopus (55) Google Scholar), whereas cytochrome b562 has a very polar C-terminal sequence (HQKYR), which is relatively inaccessible in the crystal structure(15.Mathews F.S. Bethge P.H. Czerwinski E.W. J. Biol. Chem. 1979; 254: 1699-1706Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 16.Lederer F. Glatigny A. Bethge P.H. Bellamy H.D. Mathews F.S. J. Mol. Biol. 1981; 148: 427-448Crossref PubMed Scopus (120) Google Scholar). In an attempt to make cytochrome b562 a substrate for Tsp, we constructed a gene with the cytochrome coding sequence followed by codons for the C-terminal pentapeptide WVAAA. This sequence was chosen because purified Tsp is known to cleave variants of the N-terminal domain of λ repressor and of Arc repressor, which have the WVAAA tail in vitro(7.Silber K.R. Keiler K.C. Sauer R.T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992; 89: 295-299Crossref PubMed Scopus (160) Google Scholar). ( 1K. C. Keiler and R. T. Sauer, unpublished data.) As shown in Fig. 1A, the purified cytochrome-b562-WVAAA protein is also cleaved by Tsp in vitro. The cytochrome-b562-WVAAA protein is expressed at a much lower steady-state level in cells containing Tsp than in cells lacking Tsp (Fig. 1B), and pulse-chase experiments show that the reduced steady-state level is caused by increased intracellular degradation, which is Tsp dependent (Table 1).Tabled 1 Open table in a new tab Steady-state Expression Levels Depend on the Identity of the C-terminal ResiduesEach of the three C-terminal residues of the cytochrome-b562-WVAAA substrate was individually randomized, and from 16 to 20 different amino acids were recovered at each position. The resulting variants were assayed for steady-state expression levels in tsp+ and tsp- cells as shown in Fig. 2. In this figure, open bars represent expression levels in the absence of Tsp, and closed bars represent expression levels in the presence of Tsp. In the cells containing Tsp, there are significant differences in expression levels depending on the chemical identity of the three C-terminal residues. These differences are discussed in greater detail below. In the cells lacking Tsp, all of the variants are expressed at similar levels. This suggests that Tsp is the major periplasmic protease responsible for C-terminal-specific protein degradation of the cytochrome-b562 substrates.Figure 2:Steady-state levels of cytochrome-b562 variants in the tsp+ strain X90 (filled bars) and the otherwise isogenic tsp- strain KS1000 (open bars). The error bars indicate the standard deviation from the mean for three different X90 cultures.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)Cytochrome variants with Ala, Cys, Val, Ser, and Thr at the C terminus (position 1) are expressed at the lowest steady-state levels in cells containing Tsp (Fig. 2), indicating that Tsp prefers substrates that have small, uncharged side chains at this position. Variants with polar side chains, large side chains, Pro, or Gly at the C terminus are expressed at reasonably high levels even in the presence of Tsp. In many cases, the expression levels of these variants are as high as in cells deleted for Tsp (Fig. 2). This suggests that the identity of the C-terminal residue is extremely important in determining whether a protein will be a good or poor substrate for Tsp.At the penultimate amino acid residue (position 2), variants with Ala, Tyr, Ile, and Trp are expressed at the lowest levels in the presence of Tsp, and variants with Arg, Lys, and Gly are expressed at the highest levels. In general, hydrophobic residues at position 2 appear to be preferred by Tsp relative to hydrophilic residues. Moreover, only a few side chains at this position increase expression to levels comparable to those seen in tsp- cells. This suggests that position 2 is less important than position 1 in determining resistance to Tsp cleavage.At the third position from the C terminus, Tsp prefers Ala, Leu, Val, and Ile. The least preferable side chains are Asn, Gln, and Met. It is somewhat surprising that Leu and Met, which are often considered to be conservative substitutions for each other, have such different effects at this position. No side chains at position 3 increase steady-state expression to levels observed in the absence of Tsp, suggesting that this position is less important than either position 1 or 2 in determining resistance to Tsp cleavage.Comparison of Cleavage Rates in Vivo and in VitroWe purified cytochrome-b562 variants with at least one stabilizing and one destabilizing residue at each of the three C-terminal positions and assayed rates of cleavage by Tsp in vitro (Table 1). Tsp rapidly cleaved variants with the AAA, AAV, AYA, and LAA tails but did not cleave or only slowly cleaved variants with the AAK, AGA, and QAA tails. Pulse-chase experiments were used to determine half-lives for these same variants in the cell (Fig. 3). As expected, variants that had low steady-state expression levels (AAA, AYA, LAA) had the shortest half-lives, and variants that had high steady-state expression levels (AAK, AGA) had considerably longer half-lives (Fig. 2, Table 1). As shown in Table 1, the resistance of the cytochrome-b562 variants to cleavage by Tsp in vitro correlates reasonably well (R2≈ 0.9) with the half-lives of the variants in a tsp+ strain in vivo. Thus, these data support the model that differential degradation of these proteins by Tsp in vivo is responsible for the observed differences in their half-lives and steady-state levels.Figure 3:Pulse-chase assays of the QAA and AAA cytochrome-b562 variants. Uninduced controls are shown in the lanes marked U. Arrow indicates the position of cytochrome-b562 variants.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)Effects of Tail Sequence on Protein StabilityIn principle, the different C-terminal sequences of the cytochrome-b562 variants might affect susceptibility to Tsp by reducing the thermodynamic stability of the protein. To test for this possibility, the stabilities of the purified cytochrome-b562 variants were measured by temperature denaturation monitored by CD spectroscopy (Fig. 4). The melting curve of each variant showed a Tm between 68 and 69°C, indicating that the C-terminal mutations do not affect the global stability of cytochrome b562.Figure 4:Thermal denaturation of cytochrome-b562 variants. The stability of variants was determined by monitoring CD ellipticity as a function of temperature. The fraction of folded protein was determined by fitting the thermal denaturation curves to a two-state transition between native and denatured protein. Different variants are indicated by their three C-terminal residues.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)DISCUSSIONThe work presented here has established the importance of specific amino acids at each of the three C-terminal residues in determining whether a protein is efficiently cleaved by Tsp in vitro and in vivo. In previous studies based on screening of a small number of potential protein and peptide substrates, we had concluded that Tsp appeared to recognize substrates with non-polar or hydrophobic C-terminal residues and not to recognize substrates with polar C-terminal residues(7.Silber K.R. Keiler K.C. Sauer R.T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992; 89: 295-299Crossref PubMed Scopus (160) Google Scholar, 9.Keiler K.C. Silber K.R. Downard K.M. Biemann K. Sauer R.T. Prot. Sci. 1995; 4: 1507-1515Crossref PubMed Scopus (55) Google Scholar). The data summarized in Fig. 2 reveal that this view is an over-simplification. While no good substrates have highly polar tails and most good substrates do have non-polar residues at the three C-terminal positions, there is considerable fine specificity. For example, small non-polar residues are preferred relative to larger hydrophobic side chains at the C-terminal position. At the other two positions, there is no simple correlation between the size of non-polar side chains and effects on Tsp cleavage. For example, alanine and tyrosine are the most destabilizing side chains at the penultimate residue, while valine has a significantly smaller effect at this position.How do the C-terminal residues of a substrate affect its degradation by Tsp? Unlike systems in which sequence signals act to target substrates to subcellular compartments specialized for degradation(17.Dice J.F. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1990; 15: 305-309Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (521) Google Scholar), the C-terminal sequences that mediate degradation by Tsp appear to be recognized by the protease itself. This is shown most clearly by the strong correlation between the half-lives of the cytochrome-b562 variants in vivo and the resistance of these purified variants to cleavage by purified Tsp in vitro. Since other macromolecules are not required for Tsp-mediated degradation of substrates with non-polar tails, then Tsp must either recognize these C-terminal sequences directly or recognize indirect effects of these sequences on stability or structure. Several experiments suggest that Tsp recognizes the tail sequences directly. As shown here, C-terminal sequences that make cytochrome b562 a good substrate for Tsp do not alter the thermodynamic stability of the protein. The same is true of C-terminal sequences that make Arc repressor and the N-terminal domain of λ repressor good substrates for Tsp cleavage in vitro(7.Silber K.R. Keiler K.C. Sauer R.T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992; 89: 295-299Crossref PubMed Scopus (160) Google Scholar, 9.Keiler K.C. Silber K.R. Downard K.M. Biemann K. Sauer R.T. Prot. Sci. 1995; 4: 1507-1515Crossref PubMed Scopus (55) Google Scholar). Moreover, it seems unlikely that destabilizing C-terminal tails act indirectly by allowing other sequence or structural determinants to be recognized because the same tail sequence (e.g. WVAAA) can make Arc repressor, λ repressor, and cytochrome b562 (proteins that differ in primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary structure) good substrates for Tsp cleavage. We believe that Tsp directly recognizes protein and peptide substrates by using a binding site that requires a free α-carboxyl group and side chains of the appropriate size, shape, and hydrophobicity at the last three residue positions of the substrate. Such a binding site would serve to tether the substrate to the enzyme, and binding of an appropriate C-terminal tail at this site might also function to activate the enzyme.Our studies have shown that Tsp can efficiently degrade a periplasmic protein with a WVAAA C-terminal tail. An independent protease in the cytoplasm of E. coli is also capable of rapidly degrading proteins with WVAAA tails(5.Parsell D.A. Silber K.R. Sauer R.T. Genes & Dev. 1990; 4: 277-286Crossref PubMed Scopus (96) Google Scholar, 8.Silber K.R. Sauer R.T. Mol. & Gen. Genet. 1994; 242: 237-240Crossref PubMed Scopus (34) Google Scholar). Why does E. coli use the Tsp system in the periplasm and an independent system in the cytoplasm to degrade proteins with certain C-terminal sequences? It seems unlikely that this is a general mechanism for removing unfolded or misfolded proteins from the cell. First, most damaged or misfolded proteins would not be expected to have the proper C-terminal sequence to allow degradation by a C-terminal-specific pathway. Second, Tsp and its cytoplasmic counterpart are not limited to degrading unfolded proteins. Both the cytochrome-b562 variants studied here and the λ-repressor variants used to study cytoplasmic C-terminal-specific degradation are stably folded(5.Parsell D.A. Silber K.R. Sauer R.T. Genes & Dev. 1990; 4: 277-286Crossref PubMed Scopus (96) Google Scholar). Recent studies suggest that one function of tail-specific proteases is to work in conjunction with a peptide-tagging system that marks certain proteins in E. coli for degradation (18.Tu G.-F. Reid G.E. Zhang J.-G. Moritz R.L. Simpson R.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 9322-9326Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (197) Google Scholar). ( 2K. C. Keiler, P. R. H. Waller, and R. T. Sauer, submitted for publication.) In this system, proteins translated from damaged mRNA are modified by C-terminal addition of a peptide with the sequence AANDENYALAA. The C-terminal residues of this peptide tag then render the tagged protein susceptible to degradation by Tsp or by its cytoplasmic counterpart. INTRODUCTIONThe observed selectivity of intracellular proteolysis implies the existence of mechanisms that allow proteases to discriminate between correct and incorrect protein substrates(1.Gottesman S. Maurizi M.R. Microbiol. Rev. 1992; 56: 592-621Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 2.Goldberg A.L. St. John A.C. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1976; 45: 747-803Crossref PubMed Scopus (807) Google Scholar). Some substrate recognition may be possible at the level of exposure of appropriate cleavage sites. For example, a protease might cleave almost any unfolded or partially folded protein in which peptide bonds flanked by the proper P1 and P1′ residues are accessible. This type of mechanism may serve to rid the cell of misfolded or unfolded proteins but is unlikely to allow significant selectivity unless the local sequence determinants of cleavage site selection occur only rarely. Some protein substrates may be marked for degradation by covalent modification with molecular tags, which then serve as recognition determinants in subsequent steps. The ubiquitin-proteasome system of eukaryotic cells is currently the best understood example of this type, although the determinants that cause particular proteins to be modified by ubiquitin are still not well understood(3.Ciechanover A. Cell. 1994; 79: 13-21Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1588) Google Scholar). In bacteria, there are systems in which the identity of sequences at the C-terminal or N-terminal ends of proteins appear to serve as determinants of proteolytic degradation (4.Bowie J.U. Sauer R.T. J. Biol. Chem. 1989; 264: 7596-7602Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 5.Parsell D.A. Silber K.R. Sauer R.T. Genes & Dev. 1990; 4: 277-286Crossref PubMed Scopus (96) Google Scholar, 6.Tobias J.W. Shrader T.E. Rocap G. Varshavsky A. Science. 1991; 254: 1374-1377Crossref PubMed Scopus (418) Google Scholar). In these cases, such sequences may serve as secondary binding sites, which allow a protease to tether a substrate while waiting for rare unfolding events that expose the sites of primary cleavage.Specific degradation of proteins with non-polar C-terminal sequences was first reported for several cytoplasmic proteins in Escherichia coli(4.Bowie J.U. Sauer R.T. J. Biol. Chem. 1989; 264: 7596-7602Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 5.Parsell D.A. Silber K.R. Sauer R.T. Genes & Dev. 1990; 4: 277-286Crossref PubMed Scopus (96) Google Scholar), but the protease that mediates this degradation has not been identified. Tsp (tail-specific protease) is a periplasmic protease of E. coli that was purified based on its ability to differentially degrade two protein substrates that differed only in their C-terminal residues(7.Silber K.R. Keiler K.C. Sauer R.T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992; 89: 295-299Crossref PubMed Scopus (160) Google Scholar). The protein substrate cleaved by Tsp had a relatively apolar C-terminal sequence (WVAAA), while the protein resistant to Tsp cleavage had a relatively polar C-terminal sequence (RSEYE). Although this specificity in vitro is similar to that observed in vivo for cytoplasmic degradation(5.Parsell D.A. Silber K.R. Sauer R.T. Genes & Dev. 1990; 4: 277-286Crossref PubMed Scopus (96) Google Scholar), gene knockout experiments have shown that Tsp is not involved in cytoplasmic degradation(8.Silber K.R. Sauer R.T. Mol. & Gen. Genet. 1994; 242: 237-240Crossref PubMed Scopus (34) Google Scholar). Experiments in vitro have established that Tsp is an endoprotease that cleaves substrates at discrete sites throughout the polypeptide chain in a reaction that depends upon the identity of the substrate's C-terminal sequence and requires the presence of a free α-carboxyl group(9.Keiler K.C. Silber K.R. Downard K.M. Biemann K. Sauer R.T. Prot. Sci. 1995; 4: 1507-1515Crossref PubMed Scopus (55) Google Scholar). The precise determinants that allow some C-terminal sequences but not others to be recognized by Tsp are currently unknown. Moreover, it has not yet been established that C-terminal-specific degradation of substrates by Tsp occurs in the cell. In this paper, we address these issues by studying the susceptibility of cytochrome-b562 variants to Tsp-mediated proteolysis in vivo and in vitro. Cytochrome b562 is a periplasmic protein that can be readily detected in cell lysates because binding of the protein to heme gives rise to a characteristic red absorbance spectrum(10.Itagaki E. Hager L.P. J. Biol. Chem. 1966; 241: 3687-3695Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). We show that wild-type cytochrome b562 is resistant to Tsp-mediated cleavage but becomes a good substrate when a WVAAA C-terminal tail is added. To investigate sequence preferences at the C terminus, we constructed libraries of cytochrome b562-WVAAA, with each of the last three tail positions randomized individually, and assayed for steady-state levels of the modified variants in cells containing Tsp or deleted for Tsp. These results reveal different preferences at each of the three C-terminal positions and show that Tsp is the major periplasmic protease responsible for C-terminal-specific degradation of these substrates." @default.
• W1989191904 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1989191904 creator A5012368829 @default.
• W1989191904 creator A5087571437 @default.
• W1989191904 date "1996-02-01" @default.
• W1989191904 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W1989191904 title "Sequence Determinants of C-terminal Substrate Recognition by the Tsp Protease" @default.
• W1989191904 cites W1493784536 @default.
• W1989191904 cites W1570144631 @default.
• W1989191904 cites W1591624773 @default.
• W1989191904 cites W1820160793 @default.
• W1989191904 cites W1897176773 @default.
• W1989191904 cites W1990148399 @default.
• W1989191904 cites W2013041880 @default.
• W1989191904 cites W2022964430 @default.
• W1989191904 cites W2028161058 @default.
• W1989191904 cites W2043370748 @default.
• W1989191904 cites W2071191421 @default.
• W1989191904 cites W2080868904 @default.
• W1989191904 cites W2093916503 @default.
• W1989191904 cites W2101117567 @default.
• W1989191904 cites W2106522775 @default.
• W1989191904 cites W2167223768 @default.
• W1989191904 cites W4293021319 @default.
• W1989191904 doi "https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.5.2589" @default.
• W1989191904 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8576225" @default.
• W1989191904 hasPublicationYear "1996" @default.
• W1989191904 type Work @default.
• W1989191904 sameAs 1989191904 @default.
• W1989191904 citedByCount "101" @default.
• W1989191904 countsByYear W19891919042012 @default.
• W1989191904 countsByYear W19891919042013 @default.
• W1989191904 countsByYear W19891919042014 @default.
• W1989191904 countsByYear W19891919042015 @default.
• W1989191904 countsByYear W19891919042016 @default.
• W1989191904 countsByYear W19891919042017 @default.
• W1989191904 countsByYear W19891919042019 @default.
• W1989191904 countsByYear W19891919042020 @default.
• W1989191904 countsByYear W19891919042021 @default.
• W1989191904 countsByYear W19891919042022 @default.
• W1989191904 countsByYear W19891919042023 @default.
• W1989191904 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1989191904 hasAuthorship W1989191904A5012368829 @default.
• W1989191904 hasAuthorship W1989191904A5087571437 @default.
• W1989191904 hasBestOaLocation W19891919041 @default.
• W1989191904 hasConcept C181199279 @default.
• W1989191904 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W1989191904 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W1989191904 hasConcept C2776714187 @default.
• W1989191904 hasConcept C2777289219 @default.
• W1989191904 hasConcept C2778112365 @default.
• W1989191904 hasConcept C2779664074 @default.
• W1989191904 hasConcept C31258907 @default.
• W1989191904 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1989191904 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W1989191904 hasConcept C71240020 @default.
• W1989191904 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1989191904 hasConceptScore W1989191904C181199279 @default.
• W1989191904 hasConceptScore W1989191904C185592680 @default.
• W1989191904 hasConceptScore W1989191904C18903297 @default.
• W1989191904 hasConceptScore W1989191904C2776714187 @default.
• W1989191904 hasConceptScore W1989191904C2777289219 @default.
• W1989191904 hasConceptScore W1989191904C2778112365 @default.
• W1989191904 hasConceptScore W1989191904C2779664074 @default.
• W1989191904 hasConceptScore W1989191904C31258907 @default.
• W1989191904 hasConceptScore W1989191904C41008148 @default.
• W1989191904 hasConceptScore W1989191904C55493867 @default.
• W1989191904 hasConceptScore W1989191904C71240020 @default.
• W1989191904 hasConceptScore W1989191904C86803240 @default.
• W1989191904 hasFunder F4320332161 @default.
• W1989191904 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W1989191904 hasLocation W19891919041 @default.
• W1989191904 hasOpenAccess W1989191904 @default.
• W1989191904 hasPrimaryLocation W19891919041 @default.
• W1989191904 hasRelatedWork W1528184743 @default.
• W1989191904 hasRelatedWork W1597028800 @default.
• W1989191904 hasRelatedWork W1605354657 @default.
• W1989191904 hasRelatedWork W1900331501 @default.
• W1989191904 hasRelatedWork W2063301225 @default.
• W1989191904 hasRelatedWork W2330284263 @default.
• W1989191904 hasRelatedWork W2378098089 @default.
• W1989191904 hasRelatedWork W2395601217 @default.
• W1989191904 hasRelatedWork W2782497155 @default.
• W1989191904 hasRelatedWork W3193446976 @default.
• W1989191904 hasVolume "271" @default.
• W1989191904 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1989191904 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1989191904 magId "1989191904" @default.
• W1989191904 workType "article" @default.