FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1989240483> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1989240483 endingPage "810" @default.
• W1989240483 startingPage "810" @default.
• W1989240483 abstract "<h3>Importance</h3> An important adjunct in the management of abdominal gunshot wounds, the role of computed tomography (CT) in the diagnostic workup of abdominal stab wounds remains controversial. <h3>Objective</h3> To prospectively compare CT against serial physical examination in the evaluation of patients who have sustained a stab wound to the abdomen. <h3>Design, Setting, and Patients</h3> Prospective single-center observational study of all patients sustaining abdominal stab wounds from March 1, 2009, through March 31, 2011. Patients who were hemodynamically unstable, unevaluable, peritonitic, or eviscerated proceeded directly to laparotomy (n = 249). The remainder underwent CT evaluation. The impact of CT findings and physical examination on the decision to operate was analyzed. <h3>Main Outcomes and Measures</h3> Diagnostic accuracy of CT vs physical examination in determining the need for therapeutic laparotomy. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 249 patients were enrolled (94% male; mean [SD]: age, 30.8 [12.9] years [range, 16-87 years]; systolic blood pressure, 128 [28] mm Hg; Glasgow Coma Scale score, 14 [2]; Injury Severity Score, 6.8 [6.5]). Forty-five patients (18.1%) underwent immediate laparotomy, 27 (10.8%) had superficial injuries allowing immediate discharge, and the remaining 177 (71.1%) underwent CT. Of these, 154 (87.0%) were successfully observed, with 20 (11.3%) requiring laparotomy, 2 (1.1%) thoracotomy, and 1 (0.6%) sternotomy. Of the 20 laparotomies, 16 (80.0%) were therapeutic. All patients who underwent therapeutic laparotomy did so based on their physical examination. The most common finding leading to laparotomy was the development of peritonitis in 70%. The CT scan findings did not alter clinical decision making. The sensitivity and specificity of physical examination were 100.0% and 98.7%, respectively, while those of CT were 31.3% and 84.2%, respectively. <h3>Conclusions and Relevance</h3> In this prospective evaluation of abdominal stab wound management, serial physical examination was able to discriminate between patients requiring a therapeutic laparotomy and those who could be safely observed. A physical examination–based diagnostic algorithm was effective and decreased radiation burden in the management of abdominal stab wounds." @default.
• W1989240483 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1989240483 creator A5013894775 @default.
• W1989240483 creator A5027749134 @default.
• W1989240483 creator A5035736826 @default.
• W1989240483 creator A5041380580 @default.
• W1989240483 creator A5047900529 @default.
• W1989240483 creator A5052663157 @default.
• W1989240483 creator A5054982801 @default.
• W1989240483 creator A5064880692 @default.
• W1989240483 creator A5078469644 @default.
• W1989240483 creator A5084333836 @default.
• W1989240483 date "2013-09-01" @default.
• W1989240483 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W1989240483 title "Prospective Evaluation of the Role of Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Abdominal Stab Wounds" @default.
• W1989240483 cites W1965405862 @default.
• W1989240483 cites W1975313903 @default.
• W1989240483 cites W1980363751 @default.
• W1989240483 cites W1985780428 @default.
• W1989240483 cites W2006347406 @default.
• W1989240483 cites W2035762346 @default.
• W1989240483 cites W2058320169 @default.
• W1989240483 cites W2070426200 @default.
• W1989240483 cites W2090005064 @default.
• W1989240483 cites W2092439262 @default.
• W1989240483 cites W2097163405 @default.
• W1989240483 cites W2103837002 @default.
• W1989240483 cites W2136167074 @default.
• W1989240483 cites W2147246108 @default.
• W1989240483 cites W2324271842 @default.
• W1989240483 cites W2327783950 @default.
• W1989240483 cites W275839060 @default.
• W1989240483 doi "https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2521" @default.
• W1989240483 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23824102" @default.
• W1989240483 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W1989240483 type Work @default.
• W1989240483 sameAs 1989240483 @default.
• W1989240483 citedByCount "33" @default.
• W1989240483 countsByYear W19892404832013 @default.
• W1989240483 countsByYear W19892404832014 @default.
• W1989240483 countsByYear W19892404832015 @default.
• W1989240483 countsByYear W19892404832016 @default.
• W1989240483 countsByYear W19892404832017 @default.
• W1989240483 countsByYear W19892404832018 @default.
• W1989240483 countsByYear W19892404832019 @default.
• W1989240483 countsByYear W19892404832020 @default.
• W1989240483 countsByYear W19892404832021 @default.
• W1989240483 countsByYear W19892404832022 @default.
• W1989240483 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1989240483 hasAuthorship W1989240483A5013894775 @default.
• W1989240483 hasAuthorship W1989240483A5027749134 @default.
• W1989240483 hasAuthorship W1989240483A5035736826 @default.
• W1989240483 hasAuthorship W1989240483A5041380580 @default.
• W1989240483 hasAuthorship W1989240483A5047900529 @default.
• W1989240483 hasAuthorship W1989240483A5052663157 @default.
• W1989240483 hasAuthorship W1989240483A5054982801 @default.
• W1989240483 hasAuthorship W1989240483A5064880692 @default.
• W1989240483 hasAuthorship W1989240483A5078469644 @default.
• W1989240483 hasAuthorship W1989240483A5084333836 @default.
• W1989240483 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W1989240483 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1989240483 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W1989240483 hasConcept C17624336 @default.
• W1989240483 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W1989240483 hasConcept C2778847313 @default.
• W1989240483 hasConcept C2779983558 @default.
• W1989240483 hasConcept C2780110798 @default.
• W1989240483 hasConcept C2780778865 @default.
• W1989240483 hasConcept C527108885 @default.
• W1989240483 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1989240483 hasConceptScore W1989240483C126838900 @default.
• W1989240483 hasConceptScore W1989240483C141071460 @default.
• W1989240483 hasConceptScore W1989240483C167135981 @default.
• W1989240483 hasConceptScore W1989240483C17624336 @default.
• W1989240483 hasConceptScore W1989240483C188816634 @default.
• W1989240483 hasConceptScore W1989240483C2778847313 @default.
• W1989240483 hasConceptScore W1989240483C2779983558 @default.
• W1989240483 hasConceptScore W1989240483C2780110798 @default.
• W1989240483 hasConceptScore W1989240483C2780778865 @default.
• W1989240483 hasConceptScore W1989240483C527108885 @default.
• W1989240483 hasConceptScore W1989240483C71924100 @default.
• W1989240483 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W1989240483 hasLocation W19892404831 @default.
• W1989240483 hasLocation W19892404832 @default.
• W1989240483 hasOpenAccess W1989240483 @default.
• W1989240483 hasPrimaryLocation W19892404831 @default.
• W1989240483 hasRelatedWork W1988440596 @default.
• W1989240483 hasRelatedWork W2082245748 @default.
• W1989240483 hasRelatedWork W2083936584 @default.
• W1989240483 hasRelatedWork W2102765540 @default.
• W1989240483 hasRelatedWork W2251062862 @default.
• W1989240483 hasRelatedWork W2323170575 @default.
• W1989240483 hasRelatedWork W2410904507 @default.
• W1989240483 hasRelatedWork W2465954785 @default.
• W1989240483 hasRelatedWork W3176021113 @default.
• W1989240483 hasRelatedWork W2740978252 @default.
• W1989240483 hasVolume "148" @default.
• W1989240483 isParatext "false" @default.

• next