FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1989658640> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1989658640 endingPage "1305" @default.
• W1989658640 startingPage "1294" @default.
• W1989658640 abstract "Several theories have been proposed to explain how reproductive isolation develops between populations (see Mayr, 1970; Bush, 1975; Carson, 1975; Templeton, 1980, 1981). Different mechanisms have been suggested for allopatric, sympatric, and parapatric populations, and there is some consensus about the importance of geographical isolation. Considerable disagreement persists, however, concerning the role of selection and genetic drift in the formation of reproductive isolation, as well as whether pre-mating or post-mating barriers develop first. Muller (1942) was the first to argue that reproductive barriers appear as by-products of adaptations to different environments. Populations adapting to different environments accumulate genetic differences that eventually lead to reproductive isolation. Dobzhansky (1940) placed more emphasis on the role of natural selection in the formation of barriers to gene flow. He supposed that slight post-mating barriers appear in allopatric populations, but that pre-mating barriers arise when the two populations come into contact once again. At this time selection against hybrids produces the preponderance of reproductive isolation between the incipient species. Carson (1968, 1971) has emphasized the role of genetic drift through founder effects in the formation of reproductive isolation between populations with his population flush principle. While there is still disagreement about the evolutionary dynamics of how reproductive isolation develops, the existence of reproductive isolation in many groups is well documented. Numerous examples of both preand post-mating reproductive isolating mechanisms can be found in any modern textbook on evolutionary biology. Furthermore, it is generally agreed that behavioral reproductive isolation plays a premier role in animal speciation (Dobzhansky, 1970). In certain groups, the type of reproductive isolating mechanisms that operate and how they develop is still largely unknown. This is true of zooplankton in general and rotifers in particular. For rotifers, ecologists and systematists have provided some initial insights into how pre-mating mechanisms might contribute to reproductive isolation. Allopatry probably plays a major role, at least in fresh water rotifers, because of the patchy nature of lake environments. This discrete type of environment is likely to pose substantial barriers to gene flow between populations inhabiting different lakes. Temporal isolation among populations also appears to be important. In the cyclical parthenogenetic breeding system of rotifers (Birky and Gilbert, 1971; King and Snell, 1977), sexual reproduction is an ephemeral event. Observations in natural populations suggest that rotifer species which co-occur in a habitat, often do not overlap in their periods of sexual reproduction (WesenbergLund, 1930; Carlin, 1943; reviewed by King, 1980). This lack of temporal correspondence in sexual periods could be an effective reproductive isolating mechanism. Only a single work (Gilbert, 1963) has provided any detail about the operation of behavioral reproductive isolating mechanisms in rotifers. In reciprocal tests using the freshwater rotifers Brachionus calycifiorus and Brachionus angularis, Gilbert found the males of both of these species completely species-specific in their mating reactions. When B. calycifiorus males were tested with females of three additional ro-" @default.
• W1989658640 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1989658640 creator A5001982898 @default.
• W1989658640 creator A5074711249 @default.
• W1989658640 date "1983-11-01" @default.
• W1989658640 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1989658640 title "BEHAVIORAL REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION AMONG POPULATIONS OF THE ROTIFER <i>BRACHIONUS PLICATILIS</i>" @default.
• W1989658640 cites W1910053245 @default.
• W1989658640 cites W1974737200 @default.
• W1989658640 cites W1978796180 @default.
• W1989658640 cites W2004483754 @default.
• W1989658640 cites W2035169345 @default.
• W1989658640 cites W2036002050 @default.
• W1989658640 cites W2036079651 @default.
• W1989658640 cites W2038017122 @default.
• W1989658640 cites W2047727977 @default.
• W1989658640 cites W2049193087 @default.
• W1989658640 cites W2071274460 @default.
• W1989658640 cites W2087971633 @default.
• W1989658640 cites W2094896207 @default.
• W1989658640 cites W2129260839 @default.
• W1989658640 cites W2172760571 @default.
• W1989658640 cites W2313691725 @default.
• W1989658640 cites W2317430078 @default.
• W1989658640 cites W2319049628 @default.
• W1989658640 cites W2321921999 @default.
• W1989658640 cites W2323948319 @default.
• W1989658640 cites W2328196571 @default.
• W1989658640 cites W2330895945 @default.
• W1989658640 cites W2331302710 @default.
• W1989658640 cites W2335384032 @default.
• W1989658640 cites W4249092672 @default.
• W1989658640 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb00245.x" @default.
• W1989658640 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28555996" @default.
• W1989658640 hasPublicationYear "1983" @default.
• W1989658640 type Work @default.
• W1989658640 sameAs 1989658640 @default.
• W1989658640 citedByCount "47" @default.
• W1989658640 countsByYear W19896586402016 @default.
• W1989658640 countsByYear W19896586402019 @default.
• W1989658640 countsByYear W19896586402021 @default.
• W1989658640 countsByYear W19896586402022 @default.
• W1989658640 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1989658640 hasAuthorship W1989658640A5001982898 @default.
• W1989658640 hasAuthorship W1989658640A5074711249 @default.
• W1989658640 hasBestOaLocation W19896586401 @default.
• W1989658640 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1989658640 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W1989658640 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W1989658640 hasConcept C26772143 @default.
• W1989658640 hasConcept C2775941552 @default.
• W1989658640 hasConcept C2776279094 @default.
• W1989658640 hasConcept C2777181938 @default.
• W1989658640 hasConcept C2779377512 @default.
• W1989658640 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W1989658640 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1989658640 hasConcept C89423630 @default.
• W1989658640 hasConcept C90856448 @default.
• W1989658640 hasConceptScore W1989658640C144024400 @default.
• W1989658640 hasConceptScore W1989658640C149923435 @default.
• W1989658640 hasConceptScore W1989658640C18903297 @default.
• W1989658640 hasConceptScore W1989658640C26772143 @default.
• W1989658640 hasConceptScore W1989658640C2775941552 @default.
• W1989658640 hasConceptScore W1989658640C2776279094 @default.
• W1989658640 hasConceptScore W1989658640C2777181938 @default.
• W1989658640 hasConceptScore W1989658640C2779377512 @default.
• W1989658640 hasConceptScore W1989658640C2908647359 @default.
• W1989658640 hasConceptScore W1989658640C86803240 @default.
• W1989658640 hasConceptScore W1989658640C89423630 @default.
• W1989658640 hasConceptScore W1989658640C90856448 @default.
• W1989658640 hasFunder F4320306076 @default.
• W1989658640 hasFunder F4320308883 @default.
• W1989658640 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W1989658640 hasLocation W19896586401 @default.
• W1989658640 hasLocation W19896586402 @default.
• W1989658640 hasOpenAccess W1989658640 @default.
• W1989658640 hasPrimaryLocation W19896586401 @default.
• W1989658640 hasRelatedWork W1970253445 @default.
• W1989658640 hasRelatedWork W1989658640 @default.
• W1989658640 hasRelatedWork W1991550328 @default.
• W1989658640 hasRelatedWork W2081370029 @default.
• W1989658640 hasRelatedWork W2095827908 @default.
• W1989658640 hasRelatedWork W2130803671 @default.
• W1989658640 hasRelatedWork W2145895646 @default.
• W1989658640 hasRelatedWork W2150148669 @default.
• W1989658640 hasRelatedWork W4253932035 @default.
• W1989658640 hasRelatedWork W3168909351 @default.
• W1989658640 hasVolume "37" @default.
• W1989658640 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1989658640 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1989658640 magId "1989658640" @default.
• W1989658640 workType "article" @default.