Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1989797779> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 100 of
100
with 100 items per page.
- W1989797779 endingPage "170" @default.
- W1989797779 startingPage "162" @default.
- W1989797779 abstract "Abstract We consider the problem of simultaneously testing k ≥ 2 hypotheses on parameters θ1, …, θk . In a typical application the θ's may be a set of contrasts, for instance, a set of orthogonal contrasts among population means or a set of differences between k treatment means and a standard treatment mean. It is assumed that least squares estimators 1, …, k are available that are jointly normally distributed with a common variance (known up to a scalar, namely the error variance σ 2) and a common known correlation. An independent χ 2-distributed unbiased estimator of σ 2 is also assumed to be available. We propose a step-up multiple test procedure for this problem which tests the t statistics for the k hypotheses in order starting with the least significant one and continues as long as an acceptance occurs. (By contrast, the step-down approach, which is usually used, starts with the most significant and continues as long as a rejection occurs.) Critical constants required by this step-up procedure to control the type I familywise error rate at or below a specified level α are computed for both one-sided and two-sided testing problems. Power comparisons are made for one-sided testing problems with the well-known normal theory based single-step and step-down test procedures, and also with a step-up test procedure proposed for a wider class of problems by Hochberg. (Two improvements over Hochberg's procedure by Hommel and Rom provide at best marginal increases in power, with the former being also more difficult to apply, and hence they are not included here.) Two different definitions of power are considered—the probability of rejecting all false hypotheses and the probability of rejecting at least one false hypothesis; the results are found to be qualitatively similar. The proposed step-up procedure is more powerful than the single-step procedure except when only one hypothesis is false, in which case it is slightly less powerful. Similarly, it is slightly less powerful than the step-down procedure when a few hypotheses are false, but it is more powerful when most or all hypotheses are false, and this power advantage increases with the number of such hypotheses under test. The proposed step-up procedure is uniformly more powerful than the Hochberg procedure and its improvements. A disadvantage of the proposed step-up procedure is the greater difficulty of computing its critical points. These are given for one-sided and two-sided tests for 5% level of significance." @default.
- W1989797779 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1989797779 creator A5079640568 @default.
- W1989797779 creator A5080928796 @default.
- W1989797779 date "1992-03-01" @default.
- W1989797779 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W1989797779 title "A Step-Up Multiple Test Procedure" @default.
- W1989797779 cites W1967805052 @default.
- W1989797779 cites W1971509084 @default.
- W1989797779 cites W1984486655 @default.
- W1989797779 cites W1988510003 @default.
- W1989797779 cites W2013215086 @default.
- W1989797779 cites W2036714085 @default.
- W1989797779 cites W2054264388 @default.
- W1989797779 cites W2062710473 @default.
- W1989797779 cites W2079633114 @default.
- W1989797779 cites W2083007877 @default.
- W1989797779 cites W2092931793 @default.
- W1989797779 cites W2115012618 @default.
- W1989797779 cites W2120148445 @default.
- W1989797779 cites W2320170108 @default.
- W1989797779 cites W4205210034 @default.
- W1989797779 cites W4246724958 @default.
- W1989797779 cites W4249217151 @default.
- W1989797779 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1992.10475188" @default.
- W1989797779 hasPublicationYear "1992" @default.
- W1989797779 type Work @default.
- W1989797779 sameAs 1989797779 @default.
- W1989797779 citedByCount "212" @default.
- W1989797779 countsByYear W19897977792012 @default.
- W1989797779 countsByYear W19897977792013 @default.
- W1989797779 countsByYear W19897977792014 @default.
- W1989797779 countsByYear W19897977792015 @default.
- W1989797779 countsByYear W19897977792016 @default.
- W1989797779 countsByYear W19897977792017 @default.
- W1989797779 countsByYear W19897977792018 @default.
- W1989797779 countsByYear W19897977792019 @default.
- W1989797779 countsByYear W19897977792020 @default.
- W1989797779 countsByYear W19897977792021 @default.
- W1989797779 countsByYear W19897977792022 @default.
- W1989797779 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1989797779 hasAuthorship W1989797779A5079640568 @default.
- W1989797779 hasAuthorship W1989797779A5080928796 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConcept C129848803 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConcept C177264268 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConcept C183905921 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConcept C185429906 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConcept C196083921 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConcept C2985420695 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConcept C40696583 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConcept C87007009 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConceptScore W1989797779C105795698 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConceptScore W1989797779C11413529 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConceptScore W1989797779C121955636 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConceptScore W1989797779C129848803 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConceptScore W1989797779C144024400 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConceptScore W1989797779C144133560 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConceptScore W1989797779C149923435 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConceptScore W1989797779C177264268 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConceptScore W1989797779C183905921 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConceptScore W1989797779C185429906 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConceptScore W1989797779C196083921 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConceptScore W1989797779C199360897 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConceptScore W1989797779C2908647359 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConceptScore W1989797779C2985420695 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConceptScore W1989797779C33923547 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConceptScore W1989797779C40696583 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConceptScore W1989797779C41008148 @default.
- W1989797779 hasConceptScore W1989797779C87007009 @default.
- W1989797779 hasIssue "417" @default.
- W1989797779 hasLocation W19897977791 @default.
- W1989797779 hasOpenAccess W1989797779 @default.
- W1989797779 hasPrimaryLocation W19897977791 @default.
- W1989797779 hasRelatedWork W154531455 @default.
- W1989797779 hasRelatedWork W1607313810 @default.
- W1989797779 hasRelatedWork W1995992573 @default.
- W1989797779 hasRelatedWork W2047140783 @default.
- W1989797779 hasRelatedWork W2060985069 @default.
- W1989797779 hasRelatedWork W2113330311 @default.
- W1989797779 hasRelatedWork W2188792522 @default.
- W1989797779 hasRelatedWork W2272564853 @default.
- W1989797779 hasRelatedWork W3031843515 @default.
- W1989797779 hasRelatedWork W3088276941 @default.
- W1989797779 hasVolume "87" @default.
- W1989797779 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1989797779 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1989797779 magId "1989797779" @default.
- W1989797779 workType "article" @default.