FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1990250261> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1990250261 endingPage "1369" @default.
• W1990250261 startingPage "1357" @default.
• W1990250261 abstract "The primary goal of a genomewide scan is to estimate the genomic locations of genes influencing a trait of interest. It is sometimes said that a secondary goal is to estimate the phenotypic effects of each identified locus. Here, it is shown that these two objectives cannot be met reliably by use of a single data set of a currently realistic size. Simulation and analytical results, based on variance-components linkage analysis as an example, demonstrate that estimates of locus-specific effect size at genomewide LOD score peaks tend to be grossly inflated and can even be virtually independent of the true effect size, even for studies on large samples when the true effect size is small. However, the bias diminishes asymptotically. The explanation for the bias is that the LOD score is a function of the locus-specific effect-size estimate, such that there is a high correlation between the observed statistical significance and the effect-size estimate. When the LOD score is maximized over the many pointwise tests being conducted throughout the genome, the locus-specific effect-size estimate is therefore effectively maximized as well. We argue that attempts at bias correction give unsatisfactory results, and that pointwise estimation in an independent data set may be the only way of obtaining reliable estimates of locus-specific effect—and then only if one does not condition on statistical significance being obtained. We further show that the same factors causing this bias are responsible for frequent failures to replicate initial claims of linkage or association for complex traits, even when the initial localization is, in fact, correct. The findings of this study have wide-ranging implications, as they apply to all statistical methods of gene localization. It is hoped that, by keeping this bias in mind, we will more realistically interpret and extrapolate from the results of genomewide scans. The primary goal of a genomewide scan is to estimate the genomic locations of genes influencing a trait of interest. It is sometimes said that a secondary goal is to estimate the phenotypic effects of each identified locus. Here, it is shown that these two objectives cannot be met reliably by use of a single data set of a currently realistic size. Simulation and analytical results, based on variance-components linkage analysis as an example, demonstrate that estimates of locus-specific effect size at genomewide LOD score peaks tend to be grossly inflated and can even be virtually independent of the true effect size, even for studies on large samples when the true effect size is small. However, the bias diminishes asymptotically. The explanation for the bias is that the LOD score is a function of the locus-specific effect-size estimate, such that there is a high correlation between the observed statistical significance and the effect-size estimate. When the LOD score is maximized over the many pointwise tests being conducted throughout the genome, the locus-specific effect-size estimate is therefore effectively maximized as well. We argue that attempts at bias correction give unsatisfactory results, and that pointwise estimation in an independent data set may be the only way of obtaining reliable estimates of locus-specific effect—and then only if one does not condition on statistical significance being obtained. We further show that the same factors causing this bias are responsible for frequent failures to replicate initial claims of linkage or association for complex traits, even when the initial localization is, in fact, correct. The findings of this study have wide-ranging implications, as they apply to all statistical methods of gene localization. It is hoped that, by keeping this bias in mind, we will more realistically interpret and extrapolate from the results of genomewide scans." @default.
• W1990250261 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1990250261 creator A5001462127 @default.
• W1990250261 creator A5004538115 @default.
• W1990250261 creator A5082327715 @default.
• W1990250261 date "2001-12-01" @default.
• W1990250261 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W1990250261 title "Large Upward Bias in Estimation of Locus-Specific Effects from Genomewide Scans" @default.
• W1990250261 cites W149821375 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W1545987815 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W1569564699 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W1819387938 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W1895254745 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W1919179006 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W1935910619 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W1950655113 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W1966205550 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W1976741643 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W1981845216 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W1989656083 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W1999401528 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W2003702112 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W2007445044 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W2011357578 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W2016738793 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W2036881898 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W2042103448 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W2046076301 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W2062318434 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W2072134379 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W2086220616 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W2105409288 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W2115335486 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W2115550628 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W2129824114 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W2150590579 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W2162398816 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W2412851127 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W2417706951 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W307017435 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W4231990549 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W46180618 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W96717503 @default.
• W1990250261 cites W2987011813 @default.
• W1990250261 doi "https://doi.org/10.1086/324471" @default.
• W1990250261 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/1235546" @default.
• W1990250261 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11593451" @default.
• W1990250261 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W1990250261 type Work @default.
• W1990250261 sameAs 1990250261 @default.
• W1990250261 citedByCount "452" @default.
• W1990250261 countsByYear W19902502612012 @default.
• W1990250261 countsByYear W19902502612013 @default.
• W1990250261 countsByYear W19902502612014 @default.
• W1990250261 countsByYear W19902502612015 @default.
• W1990250261 countsByYear W19902502612016 @default.
• W1990250261 countsByYear W19902502612017 @default.
• W1990250261 countsByYear W19902502612018 @default.
• W1990250261 countsByYear W19902502612019 @default.
• W1990250261 countsByYear W19902502612020 @default.
• W1990250261 countsByYear W19902502612021 @default.
• W1990250261 countsByYear W19902502612022 @default.
• W1990250261 countsByYear W19902502612023 @default.
• W1990250261 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1990250261 hasAuthorship W1990250261A5001462127 @default.
• W1990250261 hasAuthorship W1990250261A5004538115 @default.
• W1990250261 hasAuthorship W1990250261A5082327715 @default.
• W1990250261 hasBestOaLocation W19902502611 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConcept C106934330 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConcept C117220453 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConcept C129848803 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConcept C134306372 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConcept C149782125 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConcept C2777984123 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConcept C2781162219 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConcept C84597430 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConceptScore W1990250261C104317684 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConceptScore W1990250261C105795698 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConceptScore W1990250261C106934330 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConceptScore W1990250261C117220453 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConceptScore W1990250261C129848803 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConceptScore W1990250261C134306372 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConceptScore W1990250261C149782125 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConceptScore W1990250261C199360897 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConceptScore W1990250261C2524010 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConceptScore W1990250261C2777984123 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConceptScore W1990250261C2781162219 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConceptScore W1990250261C33923547 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConceptScore W1990250261C41008148 @default.
• W1990250261 hasConceptScore W1990250261C54355233 @default.

• next