FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1990664562> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1990664562 endingPage "659" @default.
• W1990664562 startingPage "655" @default.
• W1990664562 abstract "HomeRadiologyVol. 254, No. 3 PreviousNext REVIEWS AND COMMENTARYPERSPECTIVESIdentification, Biopsy, and Treatment of Poorly Understood Premalignant, in Situ, and Indolent Low-Grade Cancers: Are We Becoming Victims of Our Own Success?Ferris M. Hall Ferris M. Hall Author AffiliationsAddress correspondence to the author (e-mail: [email protected]).Ferris M. Hall Published Online:Feb 8 2010https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.09092100MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsImage ViewerAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked In AbstractImagers are increasingly detecting and performing percutaneous biopsies on borderline, preinvasive, or low-grade cancers that were heretofore rarely identified and that may never progress to meaningful disease.References1 Duffy SW, Tabár L, Vitak B, et al.. The relative contributions of screen-detected in situ and invasive breast carcinomas in reducing mortality from the disease. Eur J Cancer 2003;39(12):1755–1760. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar2 Sanders ME, Schuyler PA, Dupont WD, Page DL. The natural history of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in women treated by biopsy only revealed over 30 years of long-term follow-up. Cancer 2005;103(12):2481–2484. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar3 Esserman L, Shieh Y, Thompson I. Rethinking screening for breast cancer and prostate cancer. JAMA 2009;302(15);1685–1692. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar4 Burstein HJ, Polyak K, Wong JS, Lester SC, Kaelin CM. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. N Engl J Med 2004;350(14):1430–1441. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5 Kuhl CK. Why do purely intraductal cancers enhance on breast MR images? Radiology 2009;253(2):281–283. Link, Google Scholar6 Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Shepard MJ, Finkelstein SI, Marzoni FA. Stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy of 450 nonpalpable breast lesions with surgical correlation in lesions with cancer or atypical hyperplasia. Radiology 1994;193(1):91–95. Link, Google Scholar7 Liberman L, Cohen MA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Hann LE, Rosen PP. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions: an indication for surgical biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;164(5):1111–1113. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar8 Cohen MA. Cancer upgrades at excisional biopsy after diagnosis of atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ at core-needle biopsy: some reasons why. Radiology 2004;231(3):617–621. Link, Google Scholar9 Betsill WL, Rosen PP, Lieberman PH, Robbins GF. Intraductal carcinoma: long-term follow-up after treatment by biopsy alone. JAMA 1978;239(18):1863–1867. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar10 Pinder SE, Ellis IO. The diagnosis and management of pre-invasive breast disease: ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH)—current definitions and classification. Breast Cancer Res 2003;5(5):254–257. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar11 Karssemeijer N, Bluekens AM, Beijerinck D, et al.. Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program. Radiology 2009;253(2):353–358. Link, Google Scholar12 Schnitt SJ, Connolly JL, Tavassoli FA, et al.. Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of ductal proliferative breast lesions using standardized criteria. Am J Surg Pathol 1992;16(12):1133–1143. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar13 Sickles EA. Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases. Radiology 1991;179(2):463–468. Link, Google Scholar14 Kerlikowske K, Smith-Bindman R, Sickles EA. Short-interval follow-up mammography: are we doing the right thing? J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95(6):418–419. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar15 Jackman RJ, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: can some lesions be defined as probably benign after stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, eliminating the recommendation for surgical excision? Radiology 2002;224(2):548–554. Link, Google Scholar16 Jackman RJ. Controversies in percutaneous biopsies. Presented at the 9th postgraduate course of the Society of Breast Imaging, Colorado Springs, Colo, April 26–29, 2009. Google Scholar17 Hall FM. Impressions don’t count [letter]. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169(2):598. Crossref, Google Scholar18 Kassirer JP. Our stubborn quest for diagnostic certainty: a cause of excessive testing. N Engl J Med 1989;320(22):1489–1491. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar19 Smith-Bindman R, Chu PW, Miglioretti DL, et al.. Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United Kingdom. JAMA 2003;290(16):2129–2137. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar20 Hall FM. Computer-aided mammography screening [letter]. N Engl J Med 2009;360(8):836. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar21 Cronan JJ. Thyroid nodules: is it time to turn off the US machines? Radiology 2008;247(3):602–604. Link, Google Scholar22 Wong-You-Cheong J. Invited commentary. RadioGraphics 2008;28(7):1887–1889. Link, Google Scholar23 Harach HR, Franssila KO, Wasenius VM. Occult papillary carcinoma of the thyroid: a “normal” finding in Finland—a systematic autopsy study. Cancer 1985;56(3):531–538. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar24 Godoy MC, Naidich DP. Subsolid pulmonary nodules and the spectrum of peripheral adenocarcinomas of the lung: recommended interim guidelines for assessment and management. Radiology 2009;253(3):606–622. Link, Google Scholar25 Mori M, Rao SK, Popper HH, Cagle PT, Fraire AE. Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the lung: a probable forerunner in the development of adenocarcinoma of the lung. Mod Pathol 2001;14(2):72–84. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar26 Niho S, Yokose T, Suzuki K, Kodama T, Nishiwaki Y, Mukai K. Monoclonality of atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the lung. Am J Pathol 1999;154(1):249–254. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar27 Kelloff GJ, Choyke P, Coffey DS; Prostate Cancer Imaging Working Group. Challenges in clinical prostate cancer: role of imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192(6):1455–1470. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar28 Barry MJ. Screening for prostate cancer: the controversy that refuses to die. N Engl J Med 2009;360(13):1351–1354. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar29 Fuchs VR, Sox HC. Physicians’ views of the relative importance of thirty medical innovations. Health Aff (Millwood) 2001;20(5):30–42. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar30 Rabin RC. Benefits of mammogram under debate in Britain. New York Times. March 30, 2009:D5. Google Scholar31 Kolata G. In shift, cancer society sees risks in screenings. New York Times. October 21, 2009:A1. Google Scholar32 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151(10):716–726. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar33 Kerlikowske K. Evidence-based breast cancer prevention: the importance of individual risk. Ann Intern Med 2009;151(10):750–752 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar34 Berlin L, Hall FM. More mammography muddle: the clash of emotions. politics, science, and cost. Radiology (in press). Google ScholarArticle HistoryReceived November 9, 2009; revision received November 23; final version accepted November 23.Published online: Feb 8 2010Published in print: Mar 2010 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByImaging in Otolaryngology2018Utilization of Computer-Aided Detection for Digital Screening Mammography in the United States, 2008 to 2016John D.Keen, Joanna M.Keen, James E.Keen2018 | Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 15, No. 1Diagnostic Imaging: Head and Neck2017Essentials of Anatomic PathologyMohiedeanGhofrani, Fattaneh A.Tavassoli2016Guidelines for Management of Thyroid NodulesFerris M.Hall2015 | Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 12, No. 7Screening Mammography Guidelines: An Alternative Proactive ApproachFerris M. Hall, 24 November 2014 | Radiology, Vol. 273, No. 3Pediatric Interventional RadiologyKrijn P.van Lienden, Rick R.van Rijn2014Cáncer de mama en el varón. A propósito de un casoS.A.González-Esparza, M.E.López-Parra2013Sep1 | SEMERGEN - Medicina de Familia, Vol. 39, No. 6Does Digital Mammography Increase Detection of High-Risk Breast Lesions Presenting as Calcifications?Colleen H.Neal, Monette C.Coletti, AnnetteJoe, Deborah O.Jeffries, Mark A.Helvie2013 | American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 201, No. 5Cancer du sein : surdiagnostic, surtraitementL.Ceugnart, S.Taieb, P.Vennin2012Cancer du sein : surdiagnostic, surtraitementV.Juhan, P.Siles, S.Coze2012Is Mammographic Screening Justifiable Considering Its Substantial Overdiagnosis Rate and Minor Effect on Mortality?Karsten Juhl Jørgensen, , John D. Keen, , and Peter C. Gøtzsche, 1 September 2011 | Radiology, Vol. 260, No. 3Essentials of Anatomic PathologyMohiedeanGhofrani, Fattaneh A.Tavassoli2011Breast Cancer, a Heterogeneous Disease EntityPerSkaane2011A Resource Allocation Metric for Thyroid BiopsiesIanHammond, Mark E.Schweitzer2011 | Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 8, No. 1Controversies in mammography screening: let us not ignore science in this never-ending debatePerSkaane2011 | Acta Radiologica, Vol. 52, No. 10U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: The Unbalanced ViewW. Phil Evans, , Carol H. Lee, , Barbara S. Monsees, , Debra L. Monticciolo, , Murray Rebner, , 1 October 2010 | Radiology, Vol. 257, No. 1More Mammography Muddle: Emotions, Politics, Science, Costs, and Polarization1Leonard Berlin, , and Ferris M. Hall, 8 April 2010 | Radiology, Vol. 255, No. 2Mammographic Screening: A Well-recognized Medical AdvanceFerris M. Hall, 10 March 2010 | Radiology, Vol. 255, No. 1Gestion des microcalcifications dans le contexte de femmes à risque de cancer du seinP.Chérel, H.Berment, C.De Maulmont, R.Khayat, A.Langer2010 | Imagerie de la Femme, Vol. 20, No. 4Biopsy of Thyroid NodulesFerris M.Hall2010 | American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 194, No. 5Recommended Articles Additional Breast Cancer Detection at Digital Screening Mammography through Quality Assurance Sessions between Technologists and RadiologistsRadiology2020Volume: 294Issue: 3pp. 509-517Performance of Dual-Energy Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography for Screening Women at Increased Risk of Breast CancerRadiology2019Volume: 293Issue: 1pp. 81-88Cancer Yield and Patterns of Follow-up for BI-RADS Category 3 after Screening Mammography Recall in the National Mammography DatabaseRadiology2020Volume: 296Issue: 1pp. 32-41BI-RADS Category 3 Is a Safe and Effective Alternative to Biopsy or Surgical ExcisionRadiology2020Volume: 296Issue: 1pp. 42-43Use of Screening Mammography to Detect Occult Malignancy in Autologous Breast Reconstructions: A 15-year ExperienceRadiology2018Volume: 289Issue: 1pp. 39-48See More RSNA Education Exhibits Catch Me Before I Go Invasive! The Role of Ultrasound in Depicting Calcified and Non-Calcified DCISDigital Posters2019Breast Density Included in the Modern Rules of Mammographic ScreeningDigital Posters2019Mammographic Asymmetries BI-RADS V5 Edition: Pearls And Pitfalls, Discussion N Multi-modality Imaging And Correlation With PathologyDigital Posters2021 RSNA Case Collection Invasive Lobular CarcinomaRSNA Case Collection2021Invasive ductal carcinoma as developing asymmetryRSNA Case Collection2021BI-RADS 4C - High suspicion for malignancyRSNA Case Collection2022 Vol. 254, No. 3 Metrics Altmetric Score PDF download" @default.
• W1990664562 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1990664562 creator A5090463566 @default.
• W1990664562 date "2010-03-01" @default.
• W1990664562 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W1990664562 title "Identification, Biopsy, and Treatment of Poorly Understood Premalignant, in Situ, and Indolent Low-Grade Cancers: Are We Becoming Victims of Our Own Success?" @default.
• W1990664562 cites W1983342498 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W1988664748 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W1989112578 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W1992364439 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W1992538239 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W1996212672 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W2026974729 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W2031036602 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W2032691177 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W2044243109 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W2053953532 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W2068190319 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W2073893857 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W2077735221 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W2083115317 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W2090788639 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W2095595731 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W2100184470 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W2102976033 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W2107579655 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W2113557519 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W2117225381 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W2126318874 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W2131666638 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W2146899794 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W2154882854 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W2313039124 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W2579520182 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W4233025294 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W4254954444 @default.
• W1990664562 cites W4376848671 @default.
• W1990664562 doi "https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.09092100" @default.
• W1990664562 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20177083" @default.
• W1990664562 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W1990664562 type Work @default.
• W1990664562 sameAs 1990664562 @default.
• W1990664562 citedByCount "29" @default.
• W1990664562 countsByYear W19906645622012 @default.
• W1990664562 countsByYear W19906645622013 @default.
• W1990664562 countsByYear W19906645622014 @default.
• W1990664562 countsByYear W19906645622015 @default.
• W1990664562 countsByYear W19906645622016 @default.
• W1990664562 countsByYear W19906645622017 @default.
• W1990664562 countsByYear W19906645622018 @default.
• W1990664562 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1990664562 hasAuthorship W1990664562A5090463566 @default.
• W1990664562 hasBestOaLocation W19906645621 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConcept C116834253 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConcept C143998085 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConcept C153294291 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConcept C16005928 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConcept C2775934546 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConcept C2777661416 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConcept C2777822432 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConcept C2909505362 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConcept C59822182 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConceptScore W1990664562C116834253 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConceptScore W1990664562C121332964 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConceptScore W1990664562C121608353 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConceptScore W1990664562C126322002 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConceptScore W1990664562C142724271 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConceptScore W1990664562C143998085 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConceptScore W1990664562C153294291 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConceptScore W1990664562C16005928 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConceptScore W1990664562C2775934546 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConceptScore W1990664562C2777661416 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConceptScore W1990664562C2777822432 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConceptScore W1990664562C2909505362 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConceptScore W1990664562C59822182 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConceptScore W1990664562C71924100 @default.
• W1990664562 hasConceptScore W1990664562C86803240 @default.
• W1990664562 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W1990664562 hasLocation W19906645621 @default.
• W1990664562 hasLocation W19906645622 @default.
• W1990664562 hasOpenAccess W1990664562 @default.
• W1990664562 hasPrimaryLocation W19906645621 @default.
• W1990664562 hasRelatedWork W2006911370 @default.
• W1990664562 hasRelatedWork W2006980693 @default.
• W1990664562 hasRelatedWork W2036892782 @default.
• W1990664562 hasRelatedWork W2058262727 @default.
• W1990664562 hasRelatedWork W2337826223 @default.
• W1990664562 hasRelatedWork W2419539743 @default.
• W1990664562 hasRelatedWork W2434309309 @default.
• W1990664562 hasRelatedWork W2731051265 @default.
• W1990664562 hasRelatedWork W30847733 @default.
• W1990664562 hasRelatedWork W4297184974 @default.

• next