FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1990820920> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1990820920 endingPage "1027" @default.
• W1990820920 startingPage "1021" @default.
• W1990820920 abstract "Brugha and his colleagues in this issue raise important questions about the validity of standardized diagnostic interviews of mental disorders, such as the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) (WHO, 1990). Although their concerns refer predominantly to the use of such instruments in epidemiological research, the authors' conclusions also have significant implications for diagnostic assessments in clinical practice and research. We agree with Brugha et al . that the inflexible approach to questioning used in standardized interviews can lead to an increased risk of invalidity with regard to some diagnoses. We also agree that the use of more semi-structured clinical questions has the potential to address this problem. However, we disagree with Brugha et al . in several other respects. First, we disagree with the authors' initial exclusive emphasis on diagnosis with regard to need assessment and consequences for the allocation of service resources. It is becoming increasingly clear that knowledge about diagnosis does not, in itself, whether assessed by clinical or non-clinical diagnostic interviews, provide sufficient information we need for policy purposes and the determination of societal costs, or to judge clinical management guidelines and treatment needs (Regier et al . 1998). Additional, preferably dimensional, data on associated disabilities and distress as well as a focused need evaluation for those psychosocial, psychological and drug interventions that characterize modern treatment strategies are also important. It also has become evident that a great many people in the general population carry more than one diagnosis. This ‘co-morbidity’ complicates further such simple equation of diagnosis prevalence with need assessment and policy decisions. Secondly, we disagree with the conclusion of Brugha et al . that the use of a semi-structured clinical interview, like the most current version of the Structured Clinical Assessment for Neuropsychiatry (SCAN), whether in the hands of clinical or non-clinical interviewers, is most closely approximating the ‘clinical gold standard’ and is the most feasible way to correct the problem of disagreement between semi-structured clinical diagnostic interviews and standardized diagnostic interviews. We believe that the practical reliability and validity problems associated with using such a clinical interviewing approach especially in large-scale community surveys as well as in cross-national research more than cancel out any theoretical advantage this approach might have in clarifying meaning. Thirdly, we disagree with the suggestion of Brugha et al . that the problem of validity is inherent in standardized non-clinician interviews. Indeed, as detailed below, there is no evidence that across all diagnoses clinical semi-structured interviews reveal more promising psychometric properties than standardized interviews. Also methodological research shows quite clearly that a substantial number of potential validity problems in standardized interviews can be overcome." @default.
• W1990820920 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1990820920 creator A5020995206 @default.
• W1990820920 creator A5057810294 @default.
• W1990820920 creator A5080980894 @default.
• W1990820920 date "1999-09-01" @default.
• W1990820920 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W1990820920 title "Diagnosing mental disorders in the community. A difference that matters?" @default.
• W1990820920 cites W1555121027 @default.
• W1990820920 cites W1969970627 @default.
• W1990820920 cites W1982097959 @default.
• W1990820920 cites W2040622755 @default.
• W1990820920 cites W2047598154 @default.
• W1990820920 cites W2065142936 @default.
• W1990820920 cites W2068668347 @default.
• W1990820920 cites W2074675218 @default.
• W1990820920 cites W2095877497 @default.
• W1990820920 cites W2122898463 @default.
• W1990820920 cites W2148412563 @default.
• W1990820920 cites W2149319472 @default.
• W1990820920 cites W2154204770 @default.
• W1990820920 cites W2159061031 @default.
• W1990820920 cites W2322069134 @default.
• W1990820920 cites W2956751231 @default.
• W1990820920 cites W597086877 @default.
• W1990820920 doi "https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291799008831" @default.
• W1990820920 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10576295" @default.
• W1990820920 hasPublicationYear "1999" @default.
• W1990820920 type Work @default.
• W1990820920 sameAs 1990820920 @default.
• W1990820920 citedByCount "72" @default.
• W1990820920 countsByYear W19908209202012 @default.
• W1990820920 countsByYear W19908209202013 @default.
• W1990820920 countsByYear W19908209202014 @default.
• W1990820920 countsByYear W19908209202015 @default.
• W1990820920 countsByYear W19908209202016 @default.
• W1990820920 countsByYear W19908209202017 @default.
• W1990820920 countsByYear W19908209202019 @default.
• W1990820920 countsByYear W19908209202020 @default.
• W1990820920 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1990820920 hasAuthorship W1990820920A5020995206 @default.
• W1990820920 hasAuthorship W1990820920A5057810294 @default.
• W1990820920 hasAuthorship W1990820920A5080980894 @default.
• W1990820920 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W1990820920 hasConcept C125920245 @default.
• W1990820920 hasConcept C134362201 @default.
• W1990820920 hasConcept C139265228 @default.
• W1990820920 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W1990820920 hasConcept C150966472 @default.
• W1990820920 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1990820920 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W1990820920 hasConcept C2778963718 @default.
• W1990820920 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W1990820920 hasConcept C534262118 @default.
• W1990820920 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W1990820920 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1990820920 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W1990820920 hasConceptScore W1990820920C118552586 @default.
• W1990820920 hasConceptScore W1990820920C125920245 @default.
• W1990820920 hasConceptScore W1990820920C134362201 @default.
• W1990820920 hasConceptScore W1990820920C139265228 @default.
• W1990820920 hasConceptScore W1990820920C142724271 @default.
• W1990820920 hasConceptScore W1990820920C150966472 @default.
• W1990820920 hasConceptScore W1990820920C15744967 @default.
• W1990820920 hasConceptScore W1990820920C27415008 @default.
• W1990820920 hasConceptScore W1990820920C2778963718 @default.
• W1990820920 hasConceptScore W1990820920C2908647359 @default.
• W1990820920 hasConceptScore W1990820920C534262118 @default.
• W1990820920 hasConceptScore W1990820920C70410870 @default.
• W1990820920 hasConceptScore W1990820920C71924100 @default.
• W1990820920 hasConceptScore W1990820920C99454951 @default.
• W1990820920 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W1990820920 hasLocation W19908209201 @default.
• W1990820920 hasLocation W19908209202 @default.
• W1990820920 hasOpenAccess W1990820920 @default.
• W1990820920 hasPrimaryLocation W19908209201 @default.
• W1990820920 hasRelatedWork W2034263412 @default.
• W1990820920 hasRelatedWork W2122882916 @default.
• W1990820920 hasRelatedWork W2155217186 @default.
• W1990820920 hasRelatedWork W2269024481 @default.
• W1990820920 hasRelatedWork W2326955920 @default.
• W1990820920 hasRelatedWork W2612843735 @default.
• W1990820920 hasRelatedWork W2795020202 @default.
• W1990820920 hasRelatedWork W2800521369 @default.
• W1990820920 hasRelatedWork W4250756592 @default.
• W1990820920 hasRelatedWork W4280620214 @default.
• W1990820920 hasVolume "29" @default.
• W1990820920 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1990820920 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1990820920 magId "1990820920" @default.
• W1990820920 workType "article" @default.