FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W199126937> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W199126937 endingPage "72" @default.
• W199126937 startingPage "65" @default.
• W199126937 abstract "This review and discussion paper demonstrates that utility and preference measurement in mental health research is increasing. However there is still a general reluctance around using the methods due to methodological challenges and concerns around the capacity of users to understand utility methods during the research process.This paper sets out to describe and review some of the previously documented difficulties of using utility measurements in mental health services research and to highlight where they have been used successfully as measures. Additionally the paper aims to discuss a means of improving the methods used to capture service user utility and preference measurement and why decision making would be better informed as a result.International literature on utility measurement is reviewed, specifically examining the use of standard gamble and time trade off methods in mental health.Utility measurement in mental health is increasing though as the review demonstrates, concerns still exist over its application. A number of methods can be used to improve the approach overall and these are discussed as well as specific areas worthy of utility measurement including 'disutility' of admission, medication and medication side effects.Overall this paper argues that it is necessary to persist with efforts to conduct utility measurement calculation albeit with a critical eye on the methods in an attempt to ensure improvements are continually made. Utility and preference scores may be limited in that they only provide a rough score but they are defended as a means of providing some form of strength of preference for health states. The review is limited to English only texts.The debate on whether to use standard gamble and time trade off has implications for health services resource allocations, decision making, health economics research, policy making and health services research generally involving psychiatric service users. The paper argues that the absence of utility measurement in mental health runs the risk of mental health being disadvantaged in decisions around resource allocation.Institutions involved in decision making like the United Kingdom's National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, would be better served in their decision making and calculation of Quality Adjusted Life Years if more utility measurement in psychiatric research was carried out. Other arguments for using utility measurement include the desirability of using utility measurement to elicit a patient dimension of risk.Future utility research should aim for better involvement of service users in the design stage, the changing of time frames offered to users in health state scenarios used, a greater need for comparative work of utilities scoring across illness and between standard gamble and time trade off and more staff training in the use of utility methodology with mental health service users." @default.
• W199126937 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W199126937 creator A5085655389 @default.
• W199126937 date "2010-06-01" @default.
• W199126937 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W199126937 title "Should standard gamble and 'time trade off utility measurement be used more in mental health research?" @default.
• W199126937 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20919593" @default.
• W199126937 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W199126937 type Work @default.
• W199126937 sameAs 199126937 @default.
• W199126937 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W199126937 countsByYear W1991269372013 @default.
• W199126937 countsByYear W1991269372015 @default.
• W199126937 countsByYear W1991269372018 @default.
• W199126937 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W199126937 hasAuthorship W199126937A5085655389 @default.
• W199126937 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W199126937 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W199126937 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W199126937 hasConcept C134362201 @default.
• W199126937 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W199126937 hasConcept C144237770 @default.
• W199126937 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W199126937 hasConcept C162118730 @default.
• W199126937 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W199126937 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W199126937 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
• W199126937 hasConcept C205706631 @default.
• W199126937 hasConcept C2780378061 @default.
• W199126937 hasConcept C2781249084 @default.
• W199126937 hasConcept C3019351904 @default.
• W199126937 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W199126937 hasConcept C539667460 @default.
• W199126937 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W199126937 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W199126937 hasConceptScore W199126937C111919701 @default.
• W199126937 hasConceptScore W199126937C112930515 @default.
• W199126937 hasConceptScore W199126937C118552586 @default.
• W199126937 hasConceptScore W199126937C134362201 @default.
• W199126937 hasConceptScore W199126937C144133560 @default.
• W199126937 hasConceptScore W199126937C144237770 @default.
• W199126937 hasConceptScore W199126937C15744967 @default.
• W199126937 hasConceptScore W199126937C162118730 @default.
• W199126937 hasConceptScore W199126937C162324750 @default.
• W199126937 hasConceptScore W199126937C162853370 @default.
• W199126937 hasConceptScore W199126937C175444787 @default.
• W199126937 hasConceptScore W199126937C205706631 @default.
• W199126937 hasConceptScore W199126937C2780378061 @default.
• W199126937 hasConceptScore W199126937C2781249084 @default.
• W199126937 hasConceptScore W199126937C3019351904 @default.
• W199126937 hasConceptScore W199126937C41008148 @default.
• W199126937 hasConceptScore W199126937C539667460 @default.
• W199126937 hasConceptScore W199126937C71924100 @default.
• W199126937 hasConceptScore W199126937C98045186 @default.
• W199126937 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W199126937 hasLocation W1991269371 @default.
• W199126937 hasOpenAccess W199126937 @default.
• W199126937 hasPrimaryLocation W1991269371 @default.
• W199126937 hasRelatedWork W166564785 @default.
• W199126937 hasRelatedWork W196526521 @default.
• W199126937 hasRelatedWork W1985149660 @default.
• W199126937 hasRelatedWork W1987435384 @default.
• W199126937 hasRelatedWork W2004938963 @default.
• W199126937 hasRelatedWork W2043545375 @default.
• W199126937 hasRelatedWork W2074439104 @default.
• W199126937 hasRelatedWork W2090461767 @default.
• W199126937 hasRelatedWork W2169938428 @default.
• W199126937 hasRelatedWork W2186350435 @default.
• W199126937 hasRelatedWork W2197871850 @default.
• W199126937 hasRelatedWork W2471605275 @default.
• W199126937 hasRelatedWork W2805147568 @default.
• W199126937 hasRelatedWork W2885656544 @default.
• W199126937 hasRelatedWork W3006326580 @default.
• W199126937 hasRelatedWork W3032489872 @default.
• W199126937 hasRelatedWork W3147741969 @default.
• W199126937 hasRelatedWork W2413081910 @default.
• W199126937 hasRelatedWork W2481680095 @default.
• W199126937 hasRelatedWork W2496333247 @default.
• W199126937 hasVolume "13" @default.
• W199126937 isParatext "false" @default.
• W199126937 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W199126937 magId "199126937" @default.
• W199126937 workType "article" @default.