FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1991570594> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1991570594 endingPage "235" @default.
• W1991570594 startingPage "223" @default.
• W1991570594 abstract "MEPS Marine Ecology Progress Series Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsTheme Sections MEPS 135:223-235 (1996) - doi:10.3354/meps135223 Chlorophyll destruction by Calanus spp. grazing on phytoplankton: kinetics, effects of ingestion rate and feeding history, and a mechanistic interpretation Head EJH, Harris LR Chlorophyll destruction by Calanus spp. grazing on phytoplankton (diatoms and Phaeocystis) was assessed at stations in the Labrador Sea and off Labrador and Newfoundland (Canada). Copepods were fed at natural or diluted food concentrations over several (4 to 8) sequential 12 h feeding periods. Initial chlorophyll concentrations were between 0.2 and 19 ug l-1, and degrees of chlorophyll destruction were between 20 and 100%. For replicate incubations, degrees of chlorophyll destruction were similar. Over all experiments degrees of destruction were generally high and variable at low ingestion rates (&LT50 ng chl mg-1 h-1), decreasing to a limit of about 45% at higher ingestion rates. The relationship between ingestion rate and degree of chlorophyll destruction was not obviously affected by differences in in situ conditions (e.g. stage of the spring bloom). Filtration rates, by contrast, did vary, decreasing in the presence of an apparently noxious food (Phaeocystis) and sometimes increasing during experiments, perhaps in response to increasing hunger. Faecal pellets, collected from copepods fed at natural food concentrations, did not leak pigment over a 4 d period, and neither chlorophyll nor phaeopigment was lost as copepods with food in their guts were allowed to defecate for 3 h in filtered seawater. These results suggest that most chlorophyll destruction occurs at an early stage of feeding, and that phaeopigments are not intermediates. When we assumed in a simple model that the 'bleaching' reaction was enzymatically mediated, we found that enzyme activity varied linearly with initial ingestion rate, with a positive y-intercept. One interpretation of this is that there are 2 pools of enzyme activity: one associated with the copepods and the other with the phytoplankton. The algal enzymes are normally latent, but are activated by the physical break-up of cells during ingestion. At low ingestion rates the copepod enzyme can destroy all, or most, of the ingested chlorophyll, whereas at higher ingestion rates more of the destruction is due to the algal enzymes. The high variability in degrees of chlorophyll destruction reported here and elsewhere can be explained partly by differences between algal foods (e.g. differences in levels of the bleaching enzyme), partly by differences in copepod behaviour (e.g. effects on filtration rates), and partly by differences in experimental conditions, which affect the range of ingestion rates exhibited during an incubation (e.g. density of copepods, duration of incubation). Copepod grazing . Chlorophyll destruction . Kinetics . Ingestion rate . Enzyme mediation Full text in pdf format PreviousNextExport citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in MEPS Vol. 135. Publication date: May 17, 1996 Print ISSN:0171-8630; Online ISSN:1616-1599 Copyright © 1996 Inter-Research." @default.
• W1991570594 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1991570594 creator A5022437356 @default.
• W1991570594 creator A5028335591 @default.
• W1991570594 date "1996-01-01" @default.
• W1991570594 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W1991570594 title "Chlorophyll destruction by Calanus spp. grazing on phytoplankton:kinetics, effects of ingestion rate and feeding history, and a mechanistic interpretation" @default.
• W1991570594 doi "https://doi.org/10.3354/meps135223" @default.
• W1991570594 hasPublicationYear "1996" @default.
• W1991570594 type Work @default.
• W1991570594 sameAs 1991570594 @default.
• W1991570594 citedByCount "70" @default.
• W1991570594 countsByYear W19915705942012 @default.
• W1991570594 countsByYear W19915705942014 @default.
• W1991570594 countsByYear W19915705942016 @default.
• W1991570594 countsByYear W19915705942017 @default.
• W1991570594 countsByYear W19915705942020 @default.
• W1991570594 countsByYear W19915705942022 @default.
• W1991570594 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1991570594 hasAuthorship W1991570594A5022437356 @default.
• W1991570594 hasAuthorship W1991570594A5028335591 @default.
• W1991570594 hasBestOaLocation W19915705941 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConcept C110872660 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConcept C142796444 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConcept C155567681 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConcept C193230392 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConcept C2775941659 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConcept C2776373379 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConcept C2777235683 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConcept C2777400808 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConcept C2777904157 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConcept C2778902199 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConcept C2780695071 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConcept C2780892065 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConcept C559758991 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConcept C59822182 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConcept C84766238 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConceptScore W1991570594C110872660 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConceptScore W1991570594C142796444 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConceptScore W1991570594C155567681 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConceptScore W1991570594C18903297 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConceptScore W1991570594C193230392 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConceptScore W1991570594C2775941659 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConceptScore W1991570594C2776373379 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConceptScore W1991570594C2777235683 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConceptScore W1991570594C2777400808 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConceptScore W1991570594C2777904157 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConceptScore W1991570594C2778902199 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConceptScore W1991570594C2780695071 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConceptScore W1991570594C2780892065 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConceptScore W1991570594C55493867 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConceptScore W1991570594C559758991 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConceptScore W1991570594C59822182 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConceptScore W1991570594C84766238 @default.
• W1991570594 hasConceptScore W1991570594C86803240 @default.
• W1991570594 hasLocation W19915705941 @default.
• W1991570594 hasOpenAccess W1991570594 @default.
• W1991570594 hasPrimaryLocation W19915705941 @default.
• W1991570594 hasRelatedWork W1991570594 @default.
• W1991570594 hasRelatedWork W2015600353 @default.
• W1991570594 hasRelatedWork W2023926701 @default.
• W1991570594 hasRelatedWork W2024443772 @default.
• W1991570594 hasRelatedWork W2050322358 @default.
• W1991570594 hasRelatedWork W2062318122 @default.
• W1991570594 hasRelatedWork W2078999898 @default.
• W1991570594 hasRelatedWork W2316755834 @default.
• W1991570594 hasRelatedWork W2392260757 @default.
• W1991570594 hasRelatedWork W2488974511 @default.
• W1991570594 hasVolume "135" @default.
• W1991570594 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1991570594 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1991570594 magId "1991570594" @default.
• W1991570594 workType "article" @default.