FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1991586260> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1991586260 endingPage "1870" @default.
• W1991586260 startingPage "1858" @default.
• W1991586260 abstract "Purpose: The advent of automated beam orientation and fluence optimization enables more complex intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning using an increasing number of fields to exploit the expanded solution space. This has created a challenge in converting complex fluences to robust multileaf collimator (MLC) segments for delivery. A novel method to regularize the fluence map and simplify MLC segments is introduced to maximize delivery efficiency, accuracy, and plan quality. Methods: In this work, we implemented a novel approach to regularize optimized fluences in the dose domain. The treatment planning problem was formulated in an optimization framework to minimize the segmentation‐induced dose distribution degradation subject to a total variation regularization to encourage piecewise smoothness in fluence maps. The optimization problem was solved using a first‐order primal‐dual algorithm known as the Chambolle‐Pock algorithm. Plans for 2 GBM, 2 head and neck, and 2 lung patients were created using 20 automatically selected and optimized noncoplanar beams. The fluence was first regularized using Chambolle‐Pock and then stratified into equal steps, and the MLC segments were calculated using a previously described level reducing method. Isolated apertures with sizes smaller than preset thresholds of 1–3 bixels, which are square units of an IMRT fluence map from MLC discretization, were removed from the MLC segments. Performance of the dose domain regularized (DDR) fluences was compared to direct stratification and direct MLC segmentation (DMS) of the fluences using level reduction without dose domain fluence regularization. Results: For all six cases, the DDR method increased the average planning target volume dose homogeneity ( D 95/ D 5) from 0.814 to 0.878 while maintaining equivalent dose to organs at risk (OARs). Regularized fluences were more robust to MLC sequencing, particularly to the stratification and small aperture removal. The maximum and mean aperture sizes using the DDR were consistently larger than those from DMS for all tested number of segments. Conclusions: The fluence map to MLC segmentation conversion problem was formulated as a secondary optimization problem in the dose domain to minimize the smoothness‐regularized dose discrepancy. The large scale optimization problem was solved using a primal‐dual algorithm that transformed complicated fluences into maps that were more robust to the MLC segmentation and sequencing, affording fewer and larger segments with minimal degradation to dose distribution." @default.
• W1991586260 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1991586260 creator A5021313053 @default.
• W1991586260 creator A5040482265 @default.
• W1991586260 creator A5042160031 @default.
• W1991586260 creator A5051265222 @default.
• W1991586260 creator A5056932023 @default.
• W1991586260 creator A5081307285 @default.
• W1991586260 creator A5091674984 @default.
• W1991586260 date "2015-03-25" @default.
• W1991586260 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1991586260 title "Dose domain regularization of MLC leaf patterns for highly complex IMRT plans" @default.
• W1991586260 cites W1568307856 @default.
• W1991586260 cites W1963650567 @default.
• W1991586260 cites W1966418220 @default.
• W1991586260 cites W1967121735 @default.
• W1991586260 cites W1973615940 @default.
• W1991586260 cites W1975598755 @default.
• W1991586260 cites W1981027826 @default.
• W1991586260 cites W1982864028 @default.
• W1991586260 cites W1985540274 @default.
• W1991586260 cites W1995678696 @default.
• W1991586260 cites W1999113833 @default.
• W1991586260 cites W2003071413 @default.
• W1991586260 cites W2004827945 @default.
• W1991586260 cites W2009773024 @default.
• W1991586260 cites W2010851248 @default.
• W1991586260 cites W2020946584 @default.
• W1991586260 cites W2027595128 @default.
• W1991586260 cites W2030442960 @default.
• W1991586260 cites W2064522341 @default.
• W1991586260 cites W2067834214 @default.
• W1991586260 cites W2068860955 @default.
• W1991586260 cites W2071624787 @default.
• W1991586260 cites W2079990104 @default.
• W1991586260 cites W2082751872 @default.
• W1991586260 cites W2124963566 @default.
• W1991586260 cites W2152013559 @default.
• W1991586260 cites W4244393449 @default.
• W1991586260 cites W4292363360 @default.
• W1991586260 cites W4301021743 @default.
• W1991586260 doi "https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4915286" @default.
• W1991586260 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25832076" @default.
• W1991586260 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1991586260 type Work @default.
• W1991586260 sameAs 1991586260 @default.
• W1991586260 citedByCount "25" @default.
• W1991586260 countsByYear W19915862602016 @default.
• W1991586260 countsByYear W19915862602017 @default.
• W1991586260 countsByYear W19915862602018 @default.
• W1991586260 countsByYear W19915862602019 @default.
• W1991586260 countsByYear W19915862602020 @default.
• W1991586260 countsByYear W19915862602021 @default.
• W1991586260 countsByYear W19915862602022 @default.
• W1991586260 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1991586260 hasAuthorship W1991586260A5021313053 @default.
• W1991586260 hasAuthorship W1991586260A5040482265 @default.
• W1991586260 hasAuthorship W1991586260A5042160031 @default.
• W1991586260 hasAuthorship W1991586260A5051265222 @default.
• W1991586260 hasAuthorship W1991586260A5056932023 @default.
• W1991586260 hasAuthorship W1991586260A5081307285 @default.
• W1991586260 hasAuthorship W1991586260A5091674984 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConcept C126255220 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConcept C134306372 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConcept C161471255 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConcept C168834538 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConcept C180048950 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConcept C22078206 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConcept C2776135515 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConcept C31972630 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConcept C520434653 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConcept C73000952 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConcept C89600930 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConceptScore W1991586260C11413529 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConceptScore W1991586260C120665830 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConceptScore W1991586260C121332964 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConceptScore W1991586260C126255220 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConceptScore W1991586260C134306372 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConceptScore W1991586260C154945302 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConceptScore W1991586260C161471255 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConceptScore W1991586260C168834538 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConceptScore W1991586260C180048950 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConceptScore W1991586260C22078206 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConceptScore W1991586260C2776135515 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConceptScore W1991586260C31972630 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConceptScore W1991586260C33923547 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConceptScore W1991586260C41008148 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConceptScore W1991586260C520434653 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConceptScore W1991586260C73000952 @default.
• W1991586260 hasConceptScore W1991586260C89600930 @default.
• W1991586260 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W1991586260 hasLocation W19915862601 @default.

• next