FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1991648861> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1991648861 endingPage "171" @default.
• W1991648861 startingPage "171" @default.
• W1991648861 abstract "Interpreting accelerometer output for children and youth is challenging because characteristics related to growth and development can affect the resultant activity counts and the equations used to convert counts to energy expenditure (EE). PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to: 1) compare different equations (Heil 1 regression (H1), Heil 2 regression (H2), and Puyau (P)) available for converting counts into EE data and 2) explore the classification accuracy of count cutpoints for different physical activity (PA) intensity levels (sedentary, light, moderate, vigorous, and moderate-to-vigorous (MVPA)) for each equation and the Evenson (E) cutpoints. METHODS: Children and youth (N = 101; 62 boys and 39 girls; 6-16 yrs old; 11.2 ± 2.8 yrs, 95% White) wore a portable metabolic analyzer (breath-by-breath measures) and an omnidirectional accelerometer (set to 15-sec epochs) during 12 different activities of various intensity levels, including supine rest. Most activities were performed for five minutes (rest was 10 minutes), and two minutes of steady state from each activity were analyzed. EE data were reduced to kcal/kg/min, and resting values were subtracted to provide activity energy expenditure (AEE) values. The relationship between observed and predicted AEE values was characterized using Pearson correlation and the weighted kappa statistic. Sensitivity and specificity calculations were used to evaluate the classification accuracy. RESULTS: The correlations between observed and predicted EE were r = 0.88, 0.87, and 0.89 (P < 0.0001) for the H1, H2, and P equations, respectively. Kappas were 0.54, 0.55, 0.49, and 0.63 for the H1, H2, P, and E cutpoints across activities, respectively. Sensitivities ranged from 1.4-100.0%, and specificities ranged from 62.4-98.8% across PA intensity classifications. Sedentary activities showed the highest sensitivities across equations (99.6-100.0%), while light activities showed the lowest (1.4-41.9%). Specificities were the highest for MVPA (97.8-98.8%) across activities, while they were the lowest for sedentary activities (62.4-81.8%). CONCLUSIONS: The three equations were similar in their abilities to estimate EE. Of the four sets, the Evenson cutpoints appeared to exhibit the best sensitivity and specificity values. Funded by NICHD (RO1 HD055400-02)" @default.
• W1991648861 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1991648861 creator A5001559682 @default.
• W1991648861 creator A5024092944 @default.
• W1991648861 creator A5040354356 @default.
• W1991648861 creator A5074075627 @default.
• W1991648861 date "2009-05-01" @default.
• W1991648861 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W1991648861 title "Comparison Of Omnidirectional Accelerometer Prediction Equations And Count Cutpoints In Children And Adolescents" @default.
• W1991648861 doi "https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000354170.47387.03" @default.
• W1991648861 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W1991648861 type Work @default.
• W1991648861 sameAs 1991648861 @default.
• W1991648861 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1991648861 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1991648861 hasAuthorship W1991648861A5001559682 @default.
• W1991648861 hasAuthorship W1991648861A5024092944 @default.
• W1991648861 hasAuthorship W1991648861A5040354356 @default.
• W1991648861 hasAuthorship W1991648861A5074075627 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConcept C125567185 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConcept C152877465 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConcept C190512316 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConcept C2778724333 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConcept C3020255362 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConcept C89128539 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConcept C89805583 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConceptScore W1991648861C105795698 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConceptScore W1991648861C121332964 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConceptScore W1991648861C125567185 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConceptScore W1991648861C126322002 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConceptScore W1991648861C152877465 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConceptScore W1991648861C1862650 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConceptScore W1991648861C190512316 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConceptScore W1991648861C2524010 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConceptScore W1991648861C2778724333 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConceptScore W1991648861C3020255362 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConceptScore W1991648861C33923547 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConceptScore W1991648861C62520636 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConceptScore W1991648861C71924100 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConceptScore W1991648861C89128539 @default.
• W1991648861 hasConceptScore W1991648861C89805583 @default.
• W1991648861 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W1991648861 hasLocation W19916488611 @default.
• W1991648861 hasOpenAccess W1991648861 @default.
• W1991648861 hasPrimaryLocation W19916488611 @default.
• W1991648861 hasRelatedWork W1490963911 @default.
• W1991648861 hasRelatedWork W1540240814 @default.
• W1991648861 hasRelatedWork W1559017864 @default.
• W1991648861 hasRelatedWork W166101677 @default.
• W1991648861 hasRelatedWork W1966976587 @default.
• W1991648861 hasRelatedWork W2013743689 @default.
• W1991648861 hasRelatedWork W2490344731 @default.
• W1991648861 hasRelatedWork W3125983537 @default.
• W1991648861 hasRelatedWork W4294214983 @default.
• W1991648861 hasRelatedWork W3121132670 @default.
• W1991648861 hasVolume "41" @default.
• W1991648861 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1991648861 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1991648861 magId "1991648861" @default.
• W1991648861 workType "article" @default.