FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1991780280> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1991780280 endingPage "443" @default.
• W1991780280 startingPage "439" @default.
• W1991780280 abstract "BackgroundThe gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) questionnaire (GerdQ) is a validated questionnaire that was developed recently to help identify GERD patients. The sensitivity and specificity of GerdQ for the diagnosis of GERD in adult patients were 65% and 71%, respectively. Because the application of GerdQ in pediatric population is largely unknown, the aim of this study is to establish the endoscopic correlation between Chinese GerdQ and grades of erosive esophagitis (EE) in Taiwanese children.MethodsSeventy-four children (aged 9–18 years) were evaluated by our version of the Chinese GerdQ prior to receiving esophagogastroduodenoscopy for warning upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Grades of EE were assessed blindly, according to the Los Angeles classification. The sensitivity and specificity of GerdQ for detecting endoscopic EE were analyzed.ResultsIn 74 patients, the male to female ratio was 1:1.1 and the mean age was 14.2 ± 2.3 years (age range: 9.2–17.9 years). Thirty-nine percent of the enrolled patients had EE. The sensitivity and specificity of GerdQ (with a cutoff score of ≥7) to identify EE patients were 65.5% and 80%, respectively. The odds ratio of GerdQ for a cutoff score of 7 to identify EE was 7.6 (95% confidence interval = 2.6–21.9, p < 0.001).ConclusionFor the identification of EE in children, the Chinese GerdQ had similar sensitivity and specificity to that used for adults. This questionnaire may be applied as a noninvasive screening tool. The gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) questionnaire (GerdQ) is a validated questionnaire that was developed recently to help identify GERD patients. The sensitivity and specificity of GerdQ for the diagnosis of GERD in adult patients were 65% and 71%, respectively. Because the application of GerdQ in pediatric population is largely unknown, the aim of this study is to establish the endoscopic correlation between Chinese GerdQ and grades of erosive esophagitis (EE) in Taiwanese children. Seventy-four children (aged 9–18 years) were evaluated by our version of the Chinese GerdQ prior to receiving esophagogastroduodenoscopy for warning upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Grades of EE were assessed blindly, according to the Los Angeles classification. The sensitivity and specificity of GerdQ for detecting endoscopic EE were analyzed. In 74 patients, the male to female ratio was 1:1.1 and the mean age was 14.2 ± 2.3 years (age range: 9.2–17.9 years). Thirty-nine percent of the enrolled patients had EE. The sensitivity and specificity of GerdQ (with a cutoff score of ≥7) to identify EE patients were 65.5% and 80%, respectively. The odds ratio of GerdQ for a cutoff score of 7 to identify EE was 7.6 (95% confidence interval = 2.6–21.9, p < 0.001). For the identification of EE in children, the Chinese GerdQ had similar sensitivity and specificity to that used for adults. This questionnaire may be applied as a noninvasive screening tool." @default.
• W1991780280 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1991780280 creator A5036428672 @default.
• W1991780280 creator A5053436898 @default.
• W1991780280 creator A5076514474 @default.
• W1991780280 date "2014-12-01" @default.
• W1991780280 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W1991780280 title "Correlation Between Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire and Erosive Esophagitis in School-aged Children Receiving Endoscopy" @default.
• W1991780280 cites W1815698695 @default.
• W1991780280 cites W1838683919 @default.
• W1991780280 cites W1980943404 @default.
• W1991780280 cites W1991385024 @default.
• W1991780280 cites W2017890107 @default.
• W1991780280 cites W2023985895 @default.
• W1991780280 cites W2029880604 @default.
• W1991780280 cites W2035331411 @default.
• W1991780280 cites W2040076099 @default.
• W1991780280 cites W2041536518 @default.
• W1991780280 cites W2044240480 @default.
• W1991780280 cites W2064584679 @default.
• W1991780280 cites W2067741580 @default.
• W1991780280 cites W2069218430 @default.
• W1991780280 cites W2071557146 @default.
• W1991780280 cites W2071783610 @default.
• W1991780280 cites W2072062375 @default.
• W1991780280 cites W2078111035 @default.
• W1991780280 cites W2089457736 @default.
• W1991780280 cites W2091953828 @default.
• W1991780280 cites W2104960492 @default.
• W1991780280 cites W2114442699 @default.
• W1991780280 cites W2119729967 @default.
• W1991780280 cites W2129241891 @default.
• W1991780280 cites W2132709597 @default.
• W1991780280 cites W2141185001 @default.
• W1991780280 cites W2318621091 @default.
• W1991780280 cites W3013515259 @default.
• W1991780280 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedneo.2014.01.004" @default.
• W1991780280 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24745650" @default.
• W1991780280 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W1991780280 type Work @default.
• W1991780280 sameAs 1991780280 @default.
• W1991780280 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W1991780280 countsByYear W19917802802014 @default.
• W1991780280 countsByYear W19917802802015 @default.
• W1991780280 countsByYear W19917802802018 @default.
• W1991780280 countsByYear W19917802802019 @default.
• W1991780280 countsByYear W19917802802022 @default.
• W1991780280 countsByYear W19917802802023 @default.
• W1991780280 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1991780280 hasAuthorship W1991780280A5036428672 @default.
• W1991780280 hasAuthorship W1991780280A5053436898 @default.
• W1991780280 hasAuthorship W1991780280A5076514474 @default.
• W1991780280 hasBestOaLocation W19917802801 @default.
• W1991780280 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1991780280 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W1991780280 hasConcept C2777014526 @default.
• W1991780280 hasConcept C2778451229 @default.
• W1991780280 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W1991780280 hasConcept C2781143854 @default.
• W1991780280 hasConcept C43270747 @default.
• W1991780280 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W1991780280 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1991780280 hasConcept C90924648 @default.
• W1991780280 hasConceptScore W1991780280C126322002 @default.
• W1991780280 hasConceptScore W1991780280C156957248 @default.
• W1991780280 hasConceptScore W1991780280C2777014526 @default.
• W1991780280 hasConceptScore W1991780280C2778451229 @default.
• W1991780280 hasConceptScore W1991780280C2779134260 @default.
• W1991780280 hasConceptScore W1991780280C2781143854 @default.
• W1991780280 hasConceptScore W1991780280C43270747 @default.
• W1991780280 hasConceptScore W1991780280C44249647 @default.
• W1991780280 hasConceptScore W1991780280C71924100 @default.
• W1991780280 hasConceptScore W1991780280C90924648 @default.
• W1991780280 hasFunder F4320323422 @default.
• W1991780280 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W1991780280 hasLocation W19917802801 @default.
• W1991780280 hasLocation W19917802802 @default.
• W1991780280 hasOpenAccess W1991780280 @default.
• W1991780280 hasPrimaryLocation W19917802801 @default.
• W1991780280 hasRelatedWork W147507822 @default.
• W1991780280 hasRelatedWork W1917417311 @default.
• W1991780280 hasRelatedWork W1974189793 @default.
• W1991780280 hasRelatedWork W2012242274 @default.
• W1991780280 hasRelatedWork W2738180101 @default.
• W1991780280 hasRelatedWork W3118258997 @default.
• W1991780280 hasRelatedWork W3150091113 @default.
• W1991780280 hasRelatedWork W4292112262 @default.
• W1991780280 hasRelatedWork W4386990290 @default.
• W1991780280 hasRelatedWork W2557035047 @default.
• W1991780280 hasVolume "55" @default.
• W1991780280 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1991780280 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1991780280 magId "1991780280" @default.
• W1991780280 workType "article" @default.